Total Pageviews

Tesla\'s Earnings Indicate Some Customer Cancellations

People are lining up to reserve Tesla Motors’ electric cars, but many seem to be also yanking themselves out.

Tesla reported results for the fourth quarter of 2012 on Wednesday, and said it expected to show a slight profit in the first quarter of this year. But the stock fell 6 percent in after-hours trading. One possible reason: Numbers showing that many potential customers were having second thoughts about buying a Model S, Tesla’s sedan.

A substantial number of avid Tesla fans have certainly lined up to be among the first for the Model S. What’s less clear is how much demand exists among car buyers who aren’t the early adopters.

Tesla expects to deliver 20,000 Model S cars this year. Right now, with its production line just getting into gear, it takes time for Tesla to fulfill its orders As a result, there is a backlog of reservations.

Tesla said 15,000 cars were reserved at the end of last year, below its expectation that it will deliver 20,000 cars this year. The company added 6,000 new reservations in the fourth quarter, which makes the 20,000 target look achievable. However, Tesla’s numbers suggest that 4,000 reservations were canceled in the fourth quarter. Many customers were in line but pulled out when it became time to make a substantial down payment in cash.

Tesla doesn’t just need to hit its targets to show the world there’s real demand for its products. It also matters financially. The company aims to report a gross margin - which measures how much profit is left after subtracting the costs of making a car from revenue - of 25 percent this year. To get from the current gross margin of 8 percent, it has to increase sales by a significant amount.

Tesla officials, however, believe that the company will be able to increase its orders.

“We are n! ot demand-constrained,” Tesla’s chief executive, Elon Musk, said on an investor call on Wednesday. “We are production-constrained.”

Mr. Musk uttered almost exactly the same phrase in July on an investor conference call.



Anheuser-Busch InBev and Justice Dept. Ask for Halt in Antitrust Case

Anheuser-Busch InBev and the Justice Department said Wednesday that they were in talks to resolve antitrust concerns over the beer maker’s planned deal with Grupo Modelo, the maker of Corona beer and other brands.

The parties said they had jointly requested a temporary stay of an antitrust suit filed by the Justice Department while they work through the options.

Last year, Anheuser-Busch InBev had offered $20.1 billion to buy the rest of with Grupo Modelo that it did not already own, but the Justice Department filed suit on Jan. 31 seeking to block the deal on antitrust grounds. United States authorities had said the original Grupo Modelo merger proposal would increase Anheuser-Busch InBev’s control of the American beer marke, enabling it to raise prices while reducing choice for local consumers.

Grupo Modelo is the third-largest beer company in the United States. Anheuser-Busch InBev is the largest, ahead of MillerCoors.

In response, Anheuser-Busch InBev last week offered broad concessions, saying it would sell the rights to Corona and other Grupo Modelo brands in the United States to Constellation Brands, one of the world’s largest wine companies, for $2.9 billion. The new agreement would also include the sale of a brewery close to the United States-Mexico border that is owned by Grupo Modelo, as well as the perpetual licensing rights to Grupo Modelo’s brands in the United States.

Despite robust competition from microbrewers and other b! rands, analysts say that the craft beer market makes up just 6 percent of beer sales.

The biggest in the market, Anheuser â€" brewer of Budweiser and Stella Artois â€" has raised its prices with regularity every year, with MillerCoors following suit, the Justice Department said.

In a statement on Wednesday, the companies involved in the talks and the Justice Department jointly requested a delay until March 19. Anheuser-Busch InBev and Modelo reiterated that the “revised transaction resolves the concerns raised” by the Justice Department’s antitrust suit.



Apologies All Around for Office Depot Announcement Mishap

When it comes to Office Depot‘s inadvertent announcement of its $1.19 billion deal for OfficeMax, it’s all apologies.

On an analyst call formally announcing the merger, Office Depot’s chief executive, Neil Austrian, attributed the brief but errant posting of a statement disclosing the deal to an error by a “Webcast operator.” The information provider, whom he didn’t name, mistakenly posted the retailer’s fourth-quarter earnings “well ahead of schedule,” prompting several news organizations to report that the transaction was now public.

The service provider turns out to have been Thomson Reuters, which handles scores of clients’ investor relations needs, including updating their financial earnings releases. The company said in an e-mailed statement:

“As a leading global IR website provider, Thomson Reuters Corporate Services business handles thousands of requests each year for updates and postings of new materials to clients’ IR websites, including Office Depot. Unfortunately, Thomson Reuters incorrectly posted this morning’s announcement of Office Depot’s intention to merge with OfficeMax prior to its intended release. We regret this error and are taking all steps necessary to enhance our processes and controls to ensure this does not happen again, as serving our valued customers remains our highest priority.”

In an interview with DealBook, the chief executives of the two office suppler retailers sought to brush off the incident as a harmless error. Mr. Austrian sai! d that he called his counterpart at OfficeMax, Ravi Saligram, and apologized.

“I have to say, Ravi was a true gentleman in that regard,” Mr. Austrian said.

Mr. Saligram chalked it up to an “executional mishap” and added, “When two big Fortune 500 companies merge, occasionally mishaps happen.”



Deal Between Office Depot and OfficeMax Not Quite Ready for Release

The just-announced merger of Office Max and Office Depot has some unfortunate signs that the deal was not ready for prime time.

The most glaring reason is the botched deal announcement.

The terms of the deal were prematurely released, buried in an earnings announcement that briefly emerged on Office Depot’s Web site on Wednesday. The release was quickly taken down.

The earnings â€" and the details of the deal â€" were apparently released too early. Office Depot had a conference call for its earnings scheduled for next week. OfficeMax was set to report its financials on Thursday.

In any event, these things happen and people make mistakes. But it would seem that the inadvertent releae pushed up the announcement of a merger that hadn’t been fully negotiated.

Both ended up releasing their earnings, as well as the announcement of the deal, shortly after the opening bell rang on the New York Stock Exchange on Wednesday.

There are other troubling signs.

Instead of announcing a merger where the governance of the newly combined company was clearly established, the companies punted. OfficeMax and Office Depot said they would split the board equally, drawing directors from each side and have “governance rights from each of the two companies,” whatever that means. In other words, they split the governance, but offered few additional details. The parties didn’t even appear agree on where the headquarters, since they didn’t announce the location.

The par! ties also couldn’t agree on a chief executive. Instead, a selection team will be formed drawing from an equal number of independent board members from both companies. They will then select the chief executive.

Don’t conclude that Neil Austrian, the chairman and chief executive of Office Depot, and Ravi Saligram, the president and chief executive of OfficeMax, are out. Instead, they will be interviewed by this board as part of the process. In other words, if they want to head the combined company, they will have to audition.

This could be a recipe for disaster. Without a clear path on governance or even leadership, the combined company risks severe in-fighting as the two chiefs battle it out for the top position. And don’t think this won’t happen. Just look at what happened in the merger between Duke Energy and Progress Energy.The chosen chief executive from Progress, William D. Johnson, was ousted in a boardroom coup in favor of the head of Duke, James E. Rogers.

In truth, OfficeMax and Office Depot may not have named a chief executive as a way to paint the deal as a merger of equals. On the conference call on Wednesday morning, Mr. Austrian went out of his way to correct news releases, which had depicted the deal as an acquisition of OfficeMax by Office Depot.

And who can blame outsiders for casting the deal in that manner Like in an acquisition, OfficeMax shareholders will get a premium of 25 percent to the stock closing price last week. In a true merger of equals, neither side gets a premium.

There’s another big point that makes the deal appear to be half-baked: the issue of antitrust. The deal announcement is haunted by the specter of Staples‘s fa! iled bid ! to buy Office Depot. That deal was blocked back in 1997 when the Federal Trade Commission claimed there was a special market for big box office superstores. Consequently, the combination was viewed as anti-competitive.

In the new merger proposal, Office Depot has 19.2 percent of the office supply market and Office Max holds 15.7 percent, according to figures reported by Bloomberg from Euromonitor. Staples is the industry heavyweight with 29.9 percent.

No doubt, this combination will be reviewed with that earlier transaction in mind. The companies are likely to argue that their competitive position is declining, and that the real threat is coming from outside the traditional big-box retailers from players like Amazon.com and Costco.

The two office supply retailers may be right. But it is puzzling that the announcement did not address this issue. In most deals with potential antitrust issue, the parties issue copious presentations about the risk and how they have dealt with this. But it was only in response to a question on the conference call that the companies disclosed that there was no termination fee, in case the deal was blocked by regulators.

On that conference call, a few analysts did ask about antitrust issues, and Mr. Austrian said that the companies were “confident the market has changed sufficiently rapidly that this shouldn’t be a problem here.” Later on, Mr. Austrian outlined the changing competitive landscape, including developments in technology.

In response to other queries about the deal terms, the companies repeatedly stated that this would be disclosed later in regulatory filings.

That may very well be the case, but the uncerta! inty over! the issues of governance and antitrust is puzzling, even with the sudden release. It is too bad that OfficeMax and Office Depot couldn’t have waited a few more days to get the disclosure for the deal and the deal itself in order.



A Revolving Door in Washington That Gets Less Notice

Obsess all you’d like about President Obama’s nomination of Mary Jo White to head the Securities and Exchange Commission. Who heads the agency is vital, but important fights in Washington are happening in quiet rooms, away from the media gaze.

After a widely praised stint as a tough United States attorney, Ms. White spent the last decade serving so many large banks and investment houses that by the time she finishes recusing herself from regulatory matters, she may be down to overseeing First Wauwatosa Securities.

Now, Ms. White maintains she can run the S.E.C., without fear or favor. Bu the focus shouldn’t be limited to whether she can be effective. For lobbyists, the real targets are regulators and staff members for lawmakers.

Ms. White, at least, will have to sit for Congressional testimony, answer occasional questions from the media and fill out disclosure forms. Staff members, however, work in untroubled anonymity for the most part. So, while everyone knows there’s a revolving door â€" so naïve to even bring it up! â€" few realize just how fluidly it spins.

Take what happened late last month as Washington geared up for more fights about the taxing, spending and the deficit. The Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada, decided to bolster his staff’s expertise on taxes.

So on Jan. 25, Mr. Reid’s office announced that he had appointed Cathy Koch as chief adviser to the majority leader for tax and economic policy. The news release lists Ms. Koch’s admirable and formidable experience in the public sector. “Prior to joining Senator Reid’s office,” the release says, “Koch served as tax chief at the Senate Finance Committee.”

It’s funny, though. The notice left something out. Because immediately before joining Mr. Reid’s office, Ms. Koch wasn’t in government. She was working for a large corporation.

Not just any corporation, but quite possibly the most influential company in America, and one that arguably stands to lose the most if there were any serious tax reform that closed corporate loopholes. Ms. Koch arrives at the senator’s office by way of General Electric.

Yes, General Electric, the company that paid almost no taxes in 2010. Just as the tax reform debate is heating up, Mr. Reid has put in place a person who is extraordinarily positioned to torpedo any tax reform that might draw a dollar out of G.E. â€" and, by extension, any big corporation.

Omitting her last job from the announcement must have merely been an oversight. By the way, no rules prevent Ms. Koch from meeting with G.E. or working on issues that would affect the company.

The senator’s office, which declined to make Ms. Koch available for an interview, says that she will support the majority leader in his efforts to close corporate tax loopholes. His office said in a statement that the senator considers her knowledge of the private sector to be an asset and that she complies with “all relevant Senate ethics rules and disclos! ures.”

In a statement, the senator’s spokesman said, “The impulse in some quarters to reflexively cast suspicion on private-sector experience is part of what makes qualified individuals reluctant to enter public service.”

Over in bank regulatory land, meanwhile, January was playing out like a Beltway remake of “Freaky Friday.”

Julie Williams, chief counsel for the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and a major friend of the banks for years, had been recently shown the door by Thomas J. Curry, the new head of the regulator. Banking reform advocates took that to be an omen that a new era might be dawning at the agency, which has often been a handmaiden to large banks.

Ms. Williams, of course, landed on her feet. She’s now at the Promontory Financial Group, a classic Wshington creature that is a private-sector mirror image of a regulatory body. Promontory is the Shadow O.C.C. The firm was founded by a former head of the agency, Eugene A. Ludwig, and if you were to walk down the halls swinging a copy of the Volcker Rule, you would be sure to hit a former O.C.C. official. Promontory says only about 5 percent of its employees comes from the O.C.C., but concedes about more than a quarter are former regulators.

Promontory, as the firm explains on its Web site, “excels at helping financial companies grapple with and resolve critical issues, particularly those with a regulatory dimension.” But i! t plays f! or the other team, too, by helping the O.C.C. put into effect regulatory reviews. The dreary normality of this is a Washington scandal in the Michael Kinsley sense: a perfectly legal one.

Promontory, which demurred on a request to talk with Ms. Williams, has a different view. The firm doesn’t lobby or help in litigation. It argues that after banks stop fighting regulators and lobbying against rules, then they come to Promontory to figure out how to fix their problems and comply.

“We are known in the industry as the tough-love doctors,” said Mr. Ludwig, the chief executive of Promontory. “I am deeply committed to financial stability, and the only way to have stability is to do the right thing in both the spirit and letter of the law.”

Hmm. Remember the Independent Foreclosure Review, the program that theO.C.C. and other federal bank regulators trumpeted as the largest effort to compensate victims of big banks’ foreclosure abuses As my colleague at ProPublica, Paul Kiel, detailed last year, that review involved consultants like Promontory essentially letting banks decide who was victimized. How well did that work So well that the regulators had to scuttle the program because it hadn’t given one red cent to homeowners but somehow, I don’t know how, managed to send more than $1.5 billion to consultants â€" including Promontory.

Promontory maintains that it complied with the conditions set out by the O.C.C. And the review was replaced by a settlement, which the regulators say will compensate victi! ms â€" th! ough the average payout is small beer.

Who, exactly, makes the rules at the O.C.C. I mentioned “Freaky Friday.” That’s because at the agency, Ms. Williams is being replaced by Amy Friend. And where is Ms. Friend coming from Wait for it … Promontory. In March, maybe they’ll do the switcheroo back.

The O.C.C. didn’t make Ms. Friend available but said that her “talent, integrity and commitment to public service are beyond reproach” and would be subject to the rule requiring her to recuse herself for a year on matters specifically relating to her former employer.

I spoke with people who said she was a smart and dedicated public servant, an expert on the Dodd-Frank Act who can help finalize the scandalously long list of unfinished rules and expedite its implementation.

“Amy Friend is absolutely rowing in the right direction,” said a Senate staff member ho worked on efforts to push for stronger financial regulation.

Let’s hope so.

But people also described Ms. Friend as pragmatic. In Washington, that’s the ultimate compliment. Sadly, that has come to mean someone who seeks compromise and never pushes for an overhaul when a quarter-measure will do.

Washington today resembles something like the end of “Animal Farm.” People move from one side of the table to the other and up and down the Acela corridor with ease. An outsider looking at a negotiating table would glance from lobbyist to staff member, from colleague to former colleague, from pig to man and from man to pig and find it impossible to say which is which.



Office Depot\'s Deal for OfficeMax Said to Have Been Announced Prematurely

A merger between Office Depot and OfficeMax has been years in the making. But it appears the deal may have been announced too hastily.

A press release announcing the merger of the two office supply retailers briefly surfaced Wednesday on Office Depot’s Web site. Since then, the announcement has disappeared.

The deal negotiations are ongoing, according to two people with knowledge of the matter. As of Wednesday morning, the company’s bankers and lawyers were still attempting to finalize an agreement.

Several news organizations quickly reported the terms disclosed in the apparently errant press release, including Office Depot’s issuing $2.69 new shares of common stock for each share of fficeMax. That would value OfficeMax at $13.50, or roughly $1.19 billion, a more than 25 percent premium to the company’s closing price last week.

The two people said that the press release that was published and then taken down was a draft. The described terms were not final, they added.

Representatives for Office Depot and OfficeMax were not immediately available for comment.



Goldman Sachs Ferries Begin Service, Finally

On Hudson, Bank’s Ferries Are Finally in Service

It is a mystery that has drifted around New York Harbor for two years: Why did one of the world’s biggest investment banks buy two custom-made ferry boats and leave them bobbing, unused, on the Hudson River

One of the Goldman Sachs ferries.

On Tuesday, the idleness ended when the boats â€" named York and Jersey â€" suddenly slipped into service as commuter ferries, carrying passengers, bank employees or not, between Lower Manhattan and Jersey City. The same passengers who paid $6 each way to ride a New York Waterway workhorse last week have traded up to smoother, quieter boats with plush seating, courtesy of the bank, Goldman Sachs.

But the question of why it took Goldman so long to put its $5 million investment to use remained unanswered.

A spokeswoman for the bank, Tiffany Galvin, said that the boats began scheduled service across the Hudson on Tuesday morning. But Ms. Galvin repeatedly declined to explain the long delay, saying only that the necessary “requirements and checks” had taken longer than expected.

Ms. Galvin said it would not be appropriate to divulge why the boats’ use was blocked or if it had been blocked by a regulatory agency. The Coast Guard said that it had inspected and approved the boats for commuter use two years ago.

The unusually long clearance was a result of the oddity of Goldman’s plan. It wanted to improve the experience of crossing the water that separates its headquarters in Battery Park City and its office tower on the riverfront in Jersey City. So it ordered a pair of boats, built in Washington State, with sofa-style seating, swivel chairs and bicycle racks.

The 72-foot-long catamarans may have been built to Wall Street standards, but because they land at a public pier near the World Financial Center, Goldman could not exclude the public â€" just as if Citigroup had bought a fancy bus and asked the Metropolitan Transportation Authority to run it from the bank’s headquarters on Park Avenue to its trading base in TriBeCa.

In this case, the operator will be the BillyBey Ferry Company, which owns a fleet of boats that it hires New York Waterway to run as commuter ferries. Paul Goodman, the president of BillyBey, said there would be no change in the existing New York Waterway schedule or fares for the route. He acknowledged that he would have liked to have put the boats into service sooner but said he was sworn to keeping Goldman’s secret about the delay.

Mr. Goodman said the boats would not fly New York Waterway flags, as the boats they replaced did; nor would they bear the ferry service’s name or logos. He gave no explanation and was reluctant even to describe the interiors of the cabins for fear of endangering his charter contract by upsetting Goldman executives.

For its part, all Goldman would say through Ms. Galvin on Tuesday was: “We’re pleased to have these environmentally friendly, efficient boats in service. We think they benefit Goldman Sachs employees and the downtown community.”

A version of this article appeared in print on February 20, 2013, on page A20 of the New York edition with the headline: On Hudson, Bank’s Ferries Are Finally In Service.

Heinz Trades Draw F.B.I. Scrutiny

The Federal Bureau of Investigation is examining the suspicious trades placed ahead of the $23 billion acquisition of H.J. Heinz, DealBook’s Ben Protess reports. The inquiry adds to the cloud hanging over the deal, after the Securities and Exchange Commission took action over the trading last week.

According to a person briefed on the matter, the F.B.I. is looking into a series of well-timed options trades made before Berkshire Hathaway and 3G Capital Management announced the deal for Heinz, which sent the company’s shares soaring on Thursday. The trades involved 2,533 options bought last Wednesday through a Swiss account at Goldman Sachs, according to the S.E.C., which froze the account last week. “The F.B.I. is consulting with the S.E.C. to see if a crime was committed,” an F.B.I. spokesman said, adding that the New York office, whih was behind the government’s recent inside trading crackdown, was handling the discussions.

The government faces challenges in trying to determine whether wrongdoing was committed. In figuring out who was actually involved in the trading, the S.E.C. will have to scrutinize an account that may allow customers to mask their identity, Peter J. Henning writes in the White Collar Watch column. “Penetrating financial secrecy may be impossible without the assistance of the Swiss authorities, or whatever other country from which the trades originated.” In addition, “if the account is maintained in a jurisdiction that protects client confidentiality, then the S.E.C. could quickly hit a dead end.”

AN EDGE To EINHORN IN APPLE FIGHT  |  A federal judge said on Tuesday that he was leaning toward David Einhorn’s side in the hedge fund manager’s dispute with Apple, which is aimed at getting the company to return some of its $137 billion in cash to shareholders. Mr. Einhorn, the head of Greenlight Capital, had filed a lawsuit arguing that Apple improperly bundled a vote to limit the company’s ability to issue preferred stock with other initiatives. The judge overseeing the case, Richard J. Sullivan, said the facts of the case favored Mr. Einhorn’s interpretation, implying that he believed Securities and Exchange Commission rules prohibited grouping shareholder initiatives.

“I think success on the merits lies with Greenlight,” the judge said at the end of the hearing, though he did not immediately grant Mr. Einhorn’s request for a halt to the vote. Though the fight is over a technicality, the judge’s comments “may provide some ballast to the hedge fund managerâ€s call to other investors,” DealBook’s Michael J. de la Merced writes. Given the Feb. 27 cutoff for voting on Apple’s shareholder proposals, the judge is expected to decide within days whether to grant a preliminary injunction.

BANK OF AMERICA’S CHIEF GETS A RAISE  |  Brian T. Moynihan, the chief executive of Bank of America, saw his pay increase by more than 70 percent in 2012, to $12 million, making him one of Wall Street’s best-paid C.E.O.’s, Reuters reports. That pay package included a base salary of $950,000 and three types of stock grants, including restricted and performance-based shares. In 2013, Mr. Moynihan’s base salary is expected to increase to $1.5 million, an unidentified person familiar with the! matter t! old Reuters.

The increase came as other bank chieftains saw their pay fall. Jamie Dimon, head of JPMorgan Chase, made $11.5 million, half of what he earned the previous year, while James P. Gorman, Morgan Stanley’s chief, had his compensation fall 7 percent, to $9.75 million.

ON THE AGENDA  |  The Federal Reserve releases minutes from its meeting in late January at 2 p.m. Data on housing starts for January is released at 8:30 a.m. Robert Wolf of 32 Advisors is on CNBC at 7 a.m. Dish Network reports earnings before the market opens.

RETHINKING THE ‘CURRENCY WAR’  |  The term “currency war” has become a popular way to describe a supposed race among countries t devalue their currencies in an effort to stimulate growth. But that phrase is being misused, Steven M. Davidoff writes in the Deal Professor column. It was first used in 2010 by Guido Mantega, the Brazilian minister for finance,who “was really talking about the United States. The huge quantitative easing undertaken by the Federal Reserve has created an environment of low interest rates and put downward pressure on the dollar while pushing the currencies of other countries up.”

“The currency war is really about genuine policy disagreements between economies over how to address the easy money policies of the bigger industrialized countries, in light of the fact that many emerging market companies cannot respond with the same policies. The European Union has chosen another path by declining to adopt a stimulus approach. This explains why the world’s financial officials and ! central b! ankers have not taken much of a stand.”

Mergers & Acquisitions Â'

Colombian Bank Buys HSBC’s Panama Unit for $2.1 Billion  |  Bancolombia said on Tuesday that it had agreed to pay $2.1 billion to acquire HSBC Panama, as the bank continues to expand in Central America. DealBook Â'

NetSpend Sold to Payment Provider for $1.4 Billion in Cash  |  NetSpend, a publicly traded provider of prepaid debit cards, is being sold to Tsys for $1.4 billion, the companies announced on Tuesday. DealBook Â'

Talk of a Big Merger Gives Office Suppliers’ Stocks a Lift  |  Shares of Office Depot and OfficeMax were up significantly in trading on Tuesday, amid reports that the two were in talks to combine in a stock-for-stock deal. DealBook Â'

Pondering the Regulatory Response to an Office Supply Deal  |  Reuters reports: “Antitrust experts said on Tuesday there were no guarantees that a deal to merge Office Depot Inc., the No. 2 U.S. office supply retailer, with smaller rival OfficeMax Inc. would win government approval.” REUTERS

For Office Supply Stores, an Obvious Merger  |  Consolidation in the sector is long overdue, as the encroaching power of the likes of Amazon and Target has been evident for years, Christopher Swann of Reuters Breakingviews writes. DealBook Â'

Sale of Life Technologies Said to Hit a Snag  |  Reuters writes: “An $11 billion-plus sale of Life Technologies Corp. is looking less likely as a gap in price expectations with the company has left potential buyer Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. skeptical about a deal while buyout firms’ ofers came up short, people familiar with the matter said this week.” REUTERS

Accusations of Chinese Hacking in Coke’s Failed Big Deal  |  A new report on Chinese hackers depicts a wide-ranging cyberwar campaign against many American targets. One of them apparently was the Coca-Cola Company, which failed in a bid to buy a Chinese beverage maker. DealBook Â'

INVESTMENT BANKING Â'

French Bank Posts Record Loss on Write-Downs  |  Cré! dit Agric! ole said a series of write-downs and other charges had contributed to its largest-ever annual loss, as the bank tries to move beyond the problems in Greece and Italy that have hobbled its recent earnings. DealBook Â'

Bank Lending Falls as Share of Deposits  |  Bloomberg News reports: “The biggest U.S. banks including, JPMorgan Chase and Citigroup, are lending the smallest portion of their deposits in five years as cash floods in from savers and a slow economy damps demand from borrowers.” BLOOMBERG NEWS

Businesses Find Credit Has Eased  | Some businesses are finding a “renewed willingness by some banks to lend cheaply and on flexible terms,” The Wall Street Journal writes. WALL STREET JOURNAL

Morgan Stanley Hires Team of Financial Advisers From Merrill Lynch  | 
REUTERS

Ferries Owned by Goldman Sachs Come to Life  |  Goldman Sachs had invested $5 million in two ferry boats that sat idle in New York Harbor for two years. But on Tuesday, the boats began service, carrying passengers between Lower Manhattan and Jersey City, The New York Times reports. NEW YORK TIMES

PRIVATE EQUITY Â'

Report Paints a Rosier Picture of the Private Equity Boom  |  Research conducted by the HEC School of Management in Paris and the German fund manager Golding Capital Partners found that the absolute return on 303 private equity transactions between 2006 and 2008 was 5.1 percent through the end of 2011, significantly better than the adjusted public equity return, Fortune’s Dan Primack writes. FORTUNE

Dell Reports Decline in Revenue  | /span> Dell, which received a buyout offer from its founder and the private equity firm Silver Lake, said on Tuesday that its quarterly profit fell 31 percent, as revenue declined 11 percent, Reuters reports. REUTERS

Australian Poultry Producer Said to Attract Buyout Firms  |  The Blackstone Group and TPG Capital are considering bidding for Inghams Enterprises, which would be valued at less than $1.04 billion, according to The Wall Street Journal. WALL STREET JOURNAL

HEDGE FUNDS Â'

A Short-Seller’s Secret Weapon Is in Plain Sight  |  The head of Muddy Waters, Carson Block, whose research has led to sell-offs in Chinese stocks, said he often used letters from the Securities and Exchange Commission’s corporation-finance experts, Bloomberg News reports. BLOOMBERG NEWS

Herbalife’s Profit Beats Expectations  | 
REUTERS

Asian Hedge Funds Have a Strong Start to the Year  | 
WALL STREET JOURNAL

I.P.O./OFFERINGS Â'

Countrywide, British Real Estate Firm, Plans an I.P.O.  |  A listing by Countrywide Holdings, which is backed by Oaktree Capital, suggests “signs of a thaw” in London’s I.P.O. market, The Financial Times writes. FINANCIAL TIMES

VENTURE CAPITAL Â'

A Site for Pet Lovers, Started by a Hedge Fund Analyst  |  David Keh, a former analyst at a hedge fund, started DugDug, a site that aims to let pet owners comparis! on shop o! nline, the Bucks blog writes. NEW YORK TIMES BUCKS

LEGAL/REGULATORY Â'

Calpers Votes to Sell Holdings in Gun Makers  |  Reuters reports: “The investment committee of Calpers, the biggest American pension fund, voted Tuesday to divest itself of its holdings in two manufacturers of guns and high-capacity ammunition clips banned in California.” REUTERS

Former Deutsche Bank Trader Describes Difficulties in Tokyo’s Rates Market  |  In a new book, a former interest-rate trader at Deutsche Bank portrays a fast-moving, high-stakes, ego-fueled market controlled by a handful of players, the same market under investigation for manipulation. DealBook Â'

Judge Dismisses Suit Against Former Siemens Executive  |  A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit by the Securities and Exchange Commission that had accused Herbert Steffen and seven other former Siemens executives of paying $100 million in bribes in Argentina, Reuters reports. REUTERS

For Corporate Boards, Lessons From JPMorgan’s Tra! ding Disa! ster  |  The governance recommendations that were released as part of a report from JPMorgan Chase are highly relevant across corporate America, not just financial institutions, Michael W. Peregrine, a partner at the law firm McDermott Will & Emery, writes. DealBook Â'

In the Year of the Snake, Challenges for the Chinese EconomyIn the Year of the Snake, Challenges for the Chinese Economy  |  China is back to work after a weeklong holiday to celebrate the Chinese New Year. Questions about economic data and cyberattacks remain, Bill Bishop writes. DealBook Â'



Credit Agricole Posts Record Loss on Write-Downs

Paris - Crédit Agricole, one of France’s biggest lenders, said on Wednesday that a series of write-downs and other charges had contributed to its largest-ever annual loss, as the bank tries to move beyond the problems in Greece and Italy that have hobbled its recent earnings.

The bank, based in Paris, reported a net loss of 6.5 billion euros, or $8.7 billion, for last year. In the fourth quarter of 2012, the bank posted a net loss of about 4 billion euros, compared with a year-earlier loss of about 3.1 billion euros. Revenue fell 23 percent, to 3.3 billion euros, in the three months through Dec. 31.

Jean-Paul Chifflet, the bank’s chief executive, said in a statement that with 2012 behind the firm, “we are turning a page and will develop a new medium-term plan this year. It will show that we are moving forward on solid foundations.”

After stripping out one-time costs, the bank said net income showed “the resilience of French retail banking and a good performance in savings manaement, the group’s core businesses.” The bank’s adjusted fourth-quarter net income was about 548 million euros, up 10 percent compared to the last three months of 2011.

Mr. Chifflet said during a conference call that the bank would not need to raise capital in the financial markets. Shares of Crédit Agricole rose 7.6 percent afternoon trading in Paris on Wednesday.

The flood of red ink originated in goodwill impairments of nearly 2.7 billion euros, ahead of stricter banking rules, losses linked to the sale of its C.A. Cheuvreux brokerage unit to Kepler. The charges take into account the decline in value of the unit.

Crédit Agricole also booked a 704 million euro fourth-quarter charge related to the sale of its Athens-based unit, Emporiki, to Alpha Bank, last year, a write-down that it said left it with no residual exposure to Greece. But it said the French tax authorities had unexpectedly ordered it to pay a 132 million euro bill on the disposal, causing its loss to grow.

Fourth-quarter results also were hit by a 541 million-euro charge to earnings on the cost of revaluing the bank’s own debt.

Crédit Agricole was caught flat-footed when the euro zone crisis caused a sharp fall in the value of assets in Greece, Italy and other struggling European countries.

Over the last few years, the French firm has been streamlining its business and reducing its reliance on so-called peripheral European economies, as well as increasing its capital buffer. It disposed of its stake in the Italian lender Intesa Sanpaolo, booking a second-half loss of 445 million euros, but is still working to sort out another Italian unit, Cariparma, where it took an 852 million euro charge.

The bank said its core Tier 1 ratio, a measure of a bank’s ability to weather financial shocks, under the accounting rules known as Basel III, stood at 9.3 percent at the end of December, and that it hoped to exceed 10 percent by the end of 2013.