Total Pageviews

I.S.S. Recommends Against Sprint’s Bid for Clearwire

Institutional Shareholder Services, the proxy advisory firm, recommended on Thursday that Clearwire shareholders reject a proposed takeover bid by Sprint Nextel, worth $3.40 a share in light of a revised offer from Dish Network worth $4.40 a share. Clearwire’s board has recommended that its shareholders also vote in favor of the Dish bid over Sprint’s offer.

Sprint had already increased its offer in May but has not gone further than that. Sprint is facing resistance in its bid for Clearwire, which it views as an important part of its turnaround strategy. A number of major shareholders had angrily denounced the previous bid of $2.97 a share as too low, though other major Clearwire investors had already sold to Sprint at lower prices.

Clearwire had already postponed a shareholder vote on the Sprint bid to June 24.



When Bernanke Confounds, Wall Street Reaches for Theories

Amid the current turmoil in global markets, one question is being obsessively debated on Wall Street: Just what was Ben S. Bernanke thinking three weeks ago when he said that the Federal Reserve might soon cut back its stimulus efforts?

While second-guessing the Fed is a parlor game that traders have played for decades, it is an exercise that has taken on heightened significance. The reason: In recent years, the markets have been more dependent on central bank support than at than any time in recent memory. So when Mr. Bernanke, the Fed chairman, said that the stimulus might diminish, alarm was bound to spread. And quite a reaction it was. Since May 22, when Mr. Bernanke made the remarks in question, global stock markets have lost $3 trillion in value, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

Mr. Bernanke will get another bite at the apple on July 17 and 18 when he delivers his semiannual testimony to Congress, where his remarks will be closely scrutinized.

Before looking at what Mr. Bernanke actually said in May, it’s helpful to recall some history.

After the financial crisis of 2008, the Fed moved into emergency mode to lift the economy and support the banking system. The central bank has bought more than $2 trillion of bonds, effectively pumping that amount of money into the banking system and economy. The Fed’s latest bond purchase program kicked in this year. But in contrast to its previous programs, the Fed this time did not say in advance how much it was going to spend on bonds. Instead, the central bank said it would keep up its purchases until certain economic targets were achieved. The main goal is to get the unemployment rate down to 6.5 percent or lower. The Fed is also watching the falling inflation rate and will keep buying bonds if that indicator falls to a level that it thinks will weaken the economy and financial system.

Looking at where those two gauges are today, investors assumed the Fed would buy bonds for many months. But that changed when Mr. Bernanke testified before Congress on May 22. He said that if the Fed saw improvement in the economy, and felt it could be sustained, it “could in the next few meetings take a step down in our pace of purchases.”

The words “next few meetings” were what really worried market participants. They had become accustomed to the Fed’s implacable reassurances that it wasn’t going to change its accommodative stance until the goals had been met. Yet here was Mr. Bernanke seemingly saying that the money spigot could start closing later this year. Their thought process continued: Mr. Bernanke must know how much weight his words carry, and he always speaks very carefully to avoid upsetting the applecart, so his utterance must have been deliberate and must have had a motivation.

Here are four theories going around Wall Street for why the Fed chairman said what he said:

According to Fed observers, Mr. Bernanke has a consensual style of management on the all-important Fed committee that sets monetary policy. Some members have deep reservations about the large bond purchases. Mr. Bernanke doesn’t agree with the hawks, but he wants them to feel that their concerns are listened to. So he makes an utterance that proves to them that he’s not afraid to publicly envision a definite end to the stimulus. They then feel comforted that Helicopter Ben will have the resolve to stop the money drop â€" one day. This theory is great for the camp that thinks the Fed must keep pressing the gas. It means Mr. Bernanke was merely being a shrewd manager and isn’t going to turn stingy any time soon.

The Fed has a frighteningly poor record of spotting bubbles and deflating them before they become destructive. There is no gigantic, overarching bubble right now that could harm the wider economy. But over the last two years, as the Fed has pumped money into the financial system, large markets have been driven higher by significant amounts of speculation. A Fed governor, Jeremy C. Stein, has highlighted the risks in some of them. On Wall Street, with interest rates this low for so long, it has become easy to make bets with borrowed money. But such investments can unwind violently with even the slightest tightening of credit. Mr. Bernanke may have wanted to throw a little bit of sand into this giant leverage machine. If so, it seems to have worked so far, because some of the frothiest markets have tumbled since his testimony. From the Fed’s perspective, the risk is that the sell-off builds on itself and weighs on the wider ecnomy.

One day the Fed will clearly state that it truly is going to pare back its purchases. That could usher in a turbulent period in the markets. Talking about such withdrawal today could soften any shock it inflicts on the market when it happens. It’s the same reason parents prepare children for their first day of school during the summer. “You could see this as a trial balloon that was floated,” said Brian Smith, who trades bonds at TCW, an asset management firm. “Bernanke might have wanted to see if the market could handle a tapering.” The Fed also gets to examine exactly how the markets reacted and can make tailored responses. In recent weeks, some important assets have been acting in weirdly interconnected ways (just Google the term “convexity vortex”). The Fed is now wiser about those sorts of moves.

The final theory is that Mr. Bernanke has in fact shifted his stance. While certainly not a hawk, he has intellectually moved closer to ending the asset purchases than people might realize. It’s important to remember that the latest open-ended program was conceived at the end of last year, when there was great trepidation about the drag that fiscal retrenchment would have on the economy. “Back in December, the Fed didn’t know if we would fall off the fiscal cliff, said David Rosenberg, chief economist at Gluskin Sheff & Associates. “So it may have thought, ‘We’ll shoot now and think later.’ ” It turns out that, in spite of Washington’s budget battles, the economy has been quite resilient. For the economic conditions that exist right now, smaller purchases might be more appropriate. Some economists dispute this line of thinking. For instance, they say the Fed isn’t going to taper when inflation rate is declining like it is right now. But Mr. Bernanke may think that dip is temporary, paricularly since some forward-looking indicators in the markets predict a rise in inflation. And some economists see strong signs that the latest round of bond purchases is having its desired effect and will lead to a stronger economy as early as the second half of this year.

When faced with frantic speculation over its motives, and weakening markets, the Fed might be tempted to say things to calm everyone down. So far, the most influential Fed governors have not come out to somehow correct people’s interpretations of Mr. Bernanke’s remarks. That could work to the good of everyone.

“Although the last three weeks have been jarring to everyone - including the Fed - its prime directive is to get policy correct, not worry about several weeks of increased market volatility,” said Jim Vogel, a debt markets strategist for FTN Financial.



S.E.C. Charges and Fines Revlon for Misleading Shareholders

Revlon, the cosmetics company controlled by the billionaire financier Ronald O. Perelman, agreed to pay a $850,000 penalty to settle civil charges brought by federal securities regulators that it misled shareholders.

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced on Thursday that Revlon hid crucial information from its independent board members related to a complex corporate finance transaction that the company tried to execute with its minority shareholders.

“Going-private transactions create opportunities for shareholder abuse and can have coercive effects on minority shareholders,” said Antonia Chion, an associate director in the S.E.C.’s division of enforcement. “By erecting informational barriers, Revlon kept critically important information from its board and, in turn, misled investors.”

Colleen Mahoney, a lawyer for Revlon at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Revlon, which neither admitted nor denied wrongdoing, had previously disclosed the settlement in its quarterly earning announcement in April.

The penalty assessed against Revlon is the latest episode in Mr. Perelman’s eventful reign over the cosmetics company, which he has owned since 1985 when he gained control of it in a $1.8 billion hostile takeover. Today, Mr. Perelman’s investment company, MacAndrews & Forbes, still controls roughly three-quarters of Revlon’s shares.

By 2009, Revlon was struggling after years of losses and losing market share to competitors like L’Oreal. It was also suffering under a heavy debt load, and Mr. Perelman tried to solve the company’s balance sheet woes by buying out the minority shareholders and taking the company private.

But those plans were thwarted when a financial adviser determined that the proposed going-private transaction was unfair to Revlon and the minority shareholders. So instead of taking the company private, Mr. Perelman sought to conduct a so-called exchange offer, a transaction in which the company asked minority shareholders to exchange their stock for preferred shares.

As designed, the complex deal would help Revlon pay off a significant debt that it owed to MacAndrews & Forbes.

The independent board members of Revlon were asked to assess the fairness of the exchange offer for all of the company’s minority shareholders. Some of those minority shareholders were invested in Revlon stock through the company’s 401(k) retirement plan, and a trustee for the plan determined that its members could only exchange their shares if a third-party financial adviser decided that the transaction was adequate. After assessing the proposed deal, a financial adviser determined that the deal was, like the going-private transaction, also unfair â€" that the preferred shares being offered were not equal to the value of the common stock.

Revlon, however, went to great lengths to hide the adviser’s decision from the retirement plan members, said the S.E.C. Among other deceitful maneuvers, it altered the agreement with the trustee to ensure that the trustee would not share the adviser’s opinion. The company also represented in securities filings that the board’s process was “full, fair, and complete.”

The S.E.C. order described Revlon’s conduct as “ring fencing,” or cordoning off vital information from minority shareholders that would have helped them decide whether to exchange their shares with Mr. Perelman’s holding company. As a result of Revlon’s misconduct, the agency said, the company’s board was unable to fairly evaluate the adequacy of the exchange offer.

Shares of Revlon have performed well recently, rising about 42 percent over the past year. In midday trading Thursday, the stock was up about 2.4 percent to $20.40.

As for Mr. Perelman, he made news last month when Columbia Business School announced it had received a $100 million gift from the 70-year-old billionaire to create the Ronald O. Perelman Center for Business Innovation. Earlier in the year, he made a $25 million donation to his alma mater, the University of Pennsylvania.



In Fight Over Bank Rules, Regulator Calls for Compromise

As federal regulators stumble toward a deadline to rein in risky trading overseas, one official has introduced plans that he hopes will salvage the overhaul.

On Thursday, Bart Chilton, a Democratic member of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, called on his agency to strike a compromise over the so-called cross-border plan. While Mr. Chilton signaled a willingness to phase in certain regulations over time, he argued that the agency should finalize its plan ahead of a mid-July deadline.

“We can complete our work on cross-border issues now and provide certainty to markets now,” Mr. Chilton will say in a speech on Thursday, according to a copy of his prepared remarks.

If completed by the deadline, the guidance would clarify the breadth of new trading rules adopted in the wake of the financial crisis, when overseas risk-taking imperiled some of the largest financial firms in the United States. In particular, the guidance would outline how the rules apply to foreign banks and overseas affiliates of banks based in the United States, taking aim at those that ship trading overseas to escape scrutiny from American regulators.

The issue â€" arguably the most contentious aspect of a federal crackdown on the $700 trillion marketplace for financial instruments known as derivatives - has set off a Wall Street lobbying frenzy and divided the trading commission’s five-member panel.

With only a month to go before the agency’s self-imposed deadline, the commissioners find themselves at odds on crucial aspects of the plan, including how much to defer to European regulators, who have yet to finalize their own overhaul of derivatives trading. And in recent days, an even thornier question arose: should the commissioners delay the plan until 2014 to allow the Europeans time to catch up?

Mr. Chilton, seen as the most liberal of the agency’s commissioners, is advocating something of a middle ground.

In a speech before the Institute of International Bankers at the Yale Club in New York, he is expected to propose that the agency complete a strict version of the guidance before the July 13 deadline. But in a compromise, he will also suggest that the agency grant foreign affiliates of United States banks extra time to comply with certain derivatives rules.

“We need to make sure the right institutions are subject to appropriate regulation and oversight with recent history as a guide,” Mr. Chilton will say on Thursday. “At the same time, we should simultaneously implement targeted, staggered cross-border compliance.”

Under Mr. Chilton’s plan, the agency would allow the overseas affiliates a brief reprieve before complying with certain derivatives rules created under the Dodd-Frank Act, even though the banks have had three years to prepare for the law since it was passed after the financial crisis. The law, among other things, requires banks to register with regulators, push their derivatives trades onto regulated trading platforms and turn over a battery of information about their trades.

Mr. Chilton, who also appeared on CNBC to promote the plan, called it an “appropriately nuanced, time-limited solution,” an approach that could satisfy critics of the cross-border guidance without alienating proponents of derivatives reform.

Yet the fate of his plan is unclear. While it could be one of the few viable options left with the mid-July deadline looming, the internal wrangling at the trading commission could jeopardize any last-ditch deal-making.

Mr. Chilton and Gary Gensler, the Democratic chairman of the trading commission, are at odds with two Republican commissioners and even one Democrat, Mark Wetjen, who have raised concerns about the guidance.

The Republicans, who would like to put off writing the guidance until the end of the year, argue that it could produce conflicts with foreign regulators and drive trading business away from Wall Street banks to overseas competitors. An extended deadline, they argue, will allow foreign regulators time to draft derivatives rules of their own.

Their approach echoes concerns raised by some of the world’s top finance ministers, who are concerned that American authorities are overstepping their borders.

But Mr. Gensler, whose term ends at the end of the year, has cautioned against a deadline extension. Mr. Chilton on Thursday will also come out against such a move, arguing that the stability of the global financial system is at stake.

Just five years ago, foreign derivatives trading by the American International Group in London nearly brought American firms to their knees. JPMorgan Chase’s recent $6 billion trading loss, which took place at a London-based unit, further highlighted that risk-taking overseas can come crashing back to American shores.

While Mr. Gensler and Mr. Chilton are outnumbered, the agency is unable to extend the deadline unless the chairman approves.

“I appreciate and understand this approach, although it doesn’t do what Dodd-Frank requires us to do,” Mr. Chilton will say on Thursday.

The debate stems from the fine print of Dodd-Frank. Under the 2010 law, the trading commission is supposed to apply swaps reforms outside the United States only if those activities have “a direct and significant connection with activities in, or effect on, commerce of the United States.”

Overseas trades that involve American companies, or a foreign company that is guaranteed by an American bank, would most likely be covered. It is unclear, however, how much the trading commission will offer so-called substituted compliance, in which the trading commission will defer to foreign regulators so long as they have rules that generally compare to Dodd-Frank.

As the trading commission grapples with the nuance of the law, it has been inundated with complaints from banking lobbyists. Lawmakers, too, have taken aim at the agency. The House passed a bill on Wednesday that would curtail the agency’s ability to apply Dodd-Frank rules overseas, which could encourage the trading commission to delay its guidance.

But Mr. Chilton says the agency has had enough time to finish its work.

“This can be done,” he will say in the speech. “It needs to be done.”



S.L.R. Advantages at Half the Size

Longtime Pogue readers already know that I’m a huge fan of Sony’s recent cameras. This company came out of nowhere â€" well, out of something like seventh place â€" to seize the leadership of the industry where it counts: in sensor size.

The bigger the sensor chip in your camera, the better and sharper the low-light pictures. The less blur. The better the color. The more likely you are to get that professional soft-focus background look.

In pocket cameras, there’s still nothing that can touch the amazing Sony RX-100. It’s expensive, but its sensor dwarfs all of its rivals.

In interchangeable-lens cameras, Sony has made tremendous progress with its NEX family. These are, for all practical purposes, single-lens reflex cameras: huge sensors (APS-C size, same size as in the Canon Rebel line), swappable lenses. Yet somehow, Sony has managed to shrink these cameras to about half the size of the smallest S.L.R. You can easily slip an NEX into your coat pocket, with the lens on.

For the last few months, I’ve been carrying around the NEX-6 ($650, body only), which is in the middle of the line. (Through June 22, it’s $800 with lens, case and memory card.) Unlike the cheaper NEX cameras, it has a built-in flash, a built-in eyepiece viewfinder and a flip-out screen, so you can shoot low-down shots or up-high shots.

In essence, the NEX-6 is a less expensive version of the top-of-the-line NEX-7 ($950, body only). In fact, the 6 has a feature the 7 lacks: Wi-Fi, which lets you zap fresh photos over to your iPhone or Android phone for instant sending. You can also use your phone as a remote viewfinder, or as a remote trigger. I tried out the iPhone Wi-Fi app, called PlayMemories Mobile. It’s a little clunky to set up, but it works. (Basically, the camera acts as a Wi-Fi hot spot, to which you connect your phone. At that point, the latter controls the former.)

A few other apps are available, too. A free one lets you post directly from the camera to Facebook over a Wi-Fi hot spot; a $10 one adds time-lapse movie creation.

The NEX-6 also has a newer autofocus system that focuses almost instantaneously in good light, and in maybe half a second in dimmer scenes.

It’s been an extraordinary year of events and travel for me, and this camera has been fantastic. It’s small enough that it’s always with me, but it’s camera enough that it rarely lets you down. I’ve posted a selection of NEX-6 samples on Flickr.

As you flip through them, you’ll see a few of the NEX family’s specialties:

  • Low light. With a typical pocket camera, you’ll get blur if you try to shoot nighttime street scenes without a tripod. This one does fine.
  • Soft-focus backgrounds. A big sensor and small aperture makes possible this classic photographic effect â€" one that small cameras usually can’t achieve.
  • Crazy wide-angles. I’ve written before about how transformative Sony’s Sweep Panorama feature is. Now becoming common (it’s even built into the iPhone, for example), it lets you swing the camera in an arc to capture a huge wide panorama. But if you turn the camera 90 degrees, you get a huge tall photo that doesn’t seem like a panorama at all â€" just a sweeping, amazing vista, as though you had the world’s widest-angle lens.
  • Food, people, critters, landscapes, and architecture all benefit from these features. Battery life is 360 shots, which is excellent for a mirrorless compact like this one. You charge it over a USB cable, although you can buy a dedicated charger for $60.

    There are some things that need fixing. Here we are, in something like the sixth generation of these cameras, and Sony is still using a ridiculously awkward menu system. I wish the screen would flip all the way forward, so you could use it for self-portraits. I wish you didn’t have to switch between Photo Playback and Movie Playback modes. Why can’t movies and stills be mixed together, as they are on any other camera?

    I used the 16-50mm power-zoom lens (about 3X zoom), which is remarkable for the way it collapses flat when the camera is turned off. It does a beautiful job of zooming while you’re filming, quietly and smoothly. But I really wish it didn’t distort anybody standing near the edges of the frame.

    But in general, this is an extremely rewarding camera that occupies an impressive spot on the size/quality spectrum. Over time, you develop a trust of a camera like this, an emotional bond: “I’m having an experience I want to remember, and I know you’re not going to let me down.” Sony is most definitely on the right track.



    With HD Supply I.P.O., a Reminder of the Buyout Boom

    The excesses of the buyout boom continue to haunt private equity firms, as the experience of HD Supply Holdings illustrates.

    HD Supply, an industrial distribution company that three private equity firms bought for $8.5 billion in 2007, would be valued at far less than that in an initial public offering, according to a filing on Thursday.

    The company is expecting to price its stock between $22 and $25 a share, raising $1.2 billion at the midpoint of the range. That would value the entire company at $4.3 billion.

    Still, the private equity owners â€" the Carlyle Group, Bain Capital and Clayton Dubilier & Rice â€" are looking to take the company public at a time when stock prices have been on a tear. Conditions seems favorable for investors looking to offload their holdings.

    A string of private equity-backed companies have recently tapped public markets, including SeaWorld, the theme park operator controlled by the Blackstone Group, and Quintiles Transnational, a pharmaceutical testing company owned by TPG and Bain Capital.

    HD Supply, which once was part of Home Depot, plans to use the proceeds from its I.P.O. to reduce its debt. Its three private equity owners each hold about 28 percent of the company.

    With more than 600 outlets in the United States and Canada, HD Supply serves home builders, industrial businesses and other customers, with Home Depot accounting for about 4 percent of sales.

    The company has experienced growth under its private equity owners, with net sales increasing 14.3 percent, to $8 billion, for its fiscal year that ended Feb. 3. The company reported a loss of $1.2 billion that year, larger than the year prior.

    As of May 5, HD Supply reported $6.6 billion of total long-term debt. It is aiming to trade on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol “HDS.”

    The offering is being handled by Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Barclays, JPMorgan Chase and Credit Suisse.



    Not a Pretty Start for Coty Shares

    Perhaps it should have waited longer.

    Two years ago, the beauty products maker Coty weighed going public but pulled back when markets turned rocky. The company has now taken the plunge, and its shares had a lackluster debut on Thursday â€" when world stock markets were again nervous.

    Shares of Coty opened flat at their offering price, $17.50, and were down 0.9 percent in morning trading on the New York Stock Exchange. It is one of the biggest initial public offerings in the United States so far this year.

    Shareholders, including the wealthy Reimann family of Germany and investment firms Berkshire Partners and Rhone Capital. sold 57.14 million Class A shares of Coty on Wednesday, raising a bit less than $1 billion. The sale valued the company at about $6.7 billion.

    The Reimanns will continue to control the company through its voting shares. The family, through its investment vehicle, Joh. A. Benckiser, Coty for $440 million from Pfizer in 1992.

    Coty’s brands now include Calvin Klein, Chloé, Davidoff, Marc Jacobs, and philosophy. The company says it is No. 2 in fragrances worldwide and the sixth biggest in the world in color cosmetics. The company sells its products â€" endorsed by Beyoncé and Katy Perry â€" in more than 130 countries.



    Shares of Indian Buyer Tumble Over Cooper Deal

    Apollo Tyres’ proposed $2.5 billion acquisition of Cooper Tire and Rubber speaks to the ambitions of an Indian company seeking to become the seventh-biggest tire maker in the world.

    It would be the biggest takeover of a United States company by one based in India since the global financial crisis, according to Thomson Reuters data. And It is a deal intended to help the 41-year-old company compete better in a global automotive supply chain dominated by giants.

    At home, however, the deal has run into something of a large road bump.

    Shares of Apollo plummeted 25.45 percent in trading in Mumbai on Thursday, their first day of trading after the transaction was announced in the United States on Wednesday. The plunge came amid investor concerns about the amount of debt that the company is taking on to finance the deal.

    The all-cash acquisition is being financed entirely by new debt. Apollo has committed debt financing for $450 million from Standard Chartered, and nearly $2.38 billion in committed debt financing from Morgan Stanley, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs and Standard Chartered.

    Analysts in India were scathing about the leveraged deal.

    Noting that Apollo’s ratio of net debt to equity would go from negative 0.5 times equity to 4.8 times, analysts at IIFL Capital gave the stock a “sell” recommendation. “We highlight that a weakening balance sheet is a key concern,” they wrote.

    Analysts at Emkay wrote: “We see this as a risky acquisition as the management would have little room for error given the high leverage, very little synergy benefits and the poor demand environment.”

    Analysts at Ambit said it found the proposed acquisition of Cooper “aggressive” even while commending Apollo as “one of the best-managed tire companies in India.”

    Still they hastened to add that “over 80 percent of great companies in India self-destruct through a combination of overconfidence and unbridled expansion.”



    Gannett to Buy Belo for $1.5 Billion

    The Gannett Company agreed on Thursday to buy the Belo Corporation for about $1.5 billion in cash, in a deal that almost doubles the media company’s television operations.

    Under the terms of the deal, Gannett will pay $13.75 a share in cash, a 28 percent premium to Belo’s closing price on Wednesday. Gannett will also assume $715 million of Belo’s existing debt.

    The takeover is a move by Gannett to diversify its media operations, at a time when traditional print media continues to struggle. The company said that the transaction will increase its television portfolio to 43 stations from 23 stations, while its revenue from digital and broadcasting operations will comprise two-thirds of its pro forma earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.

    “We have been successfully transforming Gannett into a diversified multimedia company with broadcast, digital and publishing components across high-growth markets nationwide, and this is another important step in the process,” Gracia Martore, Gannett’s chief executive, said in a statement.

    The deal is expected to close by the end of the year, subject to approval by regulators.

    JPMorgan Chase and the law firms Nixon Peabody and Paul Hastings advised Gannett. RBC Capital Markets and the law firm Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz advised Belo.



    Gannett to Buy Belo for $1.5 Billion

    The Gannett Company agreed on Thursday to buy the Belo Corporation for about $1.5 billion in cash, in a deal that almost doubles the media company’s television operations.

    Under the terms of the deal, Gannett will pay $13.75 a share in cash, a 28 percent premium to Belo’s closing price on Wednesday. Gannett will also assume $715 million of Belo’s existing debt.

    The takeover is a move by Gannett to diversify its media operations, at a time when traditional print media continues to struggle. The company said that the transaction will increase its television portfolio to 43 stations from 23 stations, while its revenue from digital and broadcasting operations will comprise two-thirds of its pro forma earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.

    “We have been successfully transforming Gannett into a diversified multimedia company with broadcast, digital and publishing components across high-growth markets nationwide, and this is another important step in the process,” Gracia Martore, Gannett’s chief executive, said in a statement.

    The deal is expected to close by the end of the year, subject to approval by regulators.

    JPMorgan Chase and the law firms Nixon Peabody and Paul Hastings advised Gannett. RBC Capital Markets and the law firm Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz advised Belo.



    Goldman’s Prince Charles

    “Inside Goldman Sachs, Gary D. Cohn is the man who is waiting â€" and waiting â€" to be king,” DealBook’s Susanne Craig writes. While Mr. Cohn has long been considered the heir apparent of Lloyd C. Blankfein, the chairman and chief executive of Goldman, there are few signs that Mr. Blankfein is ready to step aside, insiders say.

    After surviving a firestorm in the wake of the financial crisis, Mr. Blankfein appears to be enjoying himself. Now an elder statesman of finance, Mr. Blankfein is not widely talked about as a candidate for a Washington job. So, he has regrown a beard and begun to embrace the limelight atop Goldman, often joking that he plans to die at his desk. “It is no laughing matter for Mr. Cohn, who as Goldman’s 52-year-old president is the Prince Charles of Wall Street, a man for whom the crown seems just beyond his grasp,” Ms. Craig writes.

    “Mr. Cohn is growing increasingly restless, according to friends and colleagues. Some inside Goldman wonder if he will depart if Mr. Blankfein doesn’t move soon. That would throw a monkey wrench into Goldman’s succession plans, leaving the firm without a natural candidate ready to replace Mr. Blankfein.” Still, Mr. Cohn’s options are limited. He could probably make more money working at a hedge fund, but such a move would almost certainly come with less power than the top job at Goldman. “As a result, some people inside Goldman feel that Mr. Cohn is not serious about leaving anytime soon.”

    QUESTIONS SURROUND R.B.S.  |  The announcement by Stephen Hester, the chief executive of the Royal Bank of Scotland, that he would leave by the end of the year has introduced fresh uncertainty into the future privatization of the bank, DealBook’s Mark Scott writes. Investors expressed their displeasure with the surprise move, sending the bank’s shares down more than 6 percent in trading in London on Thursday.

    The British government owns 81 percent of R.B.S., though the bank had hoped to start reducing that stake in the second half of the year. By jettisoning Mr. Hester, the bank’s board hopes to install a new leader to oversee a privatization process that could last the rest of the decade. But for many, the departure of Mr. Hester, a former Credit Suisse banker, raised concerns about how the bank would navigate the share sale.

    “This is a bruising, difficult job,” Mr. Hester said. “I have regrets about not completing the job.”

    ON THE AGENDA  |  It is shaping up to be a rocky day in the markets, with stocks in Asia and Europe sharply lower. Japan’s Nikkei index closed down 6.4 percent. Coty is set to begin trading after raising about $1 billion in its initial public offering. Data on retail sales in the United States is out at 8:30 a.m. Mr. Blankfein of Goldman Sachs speaks at a breakfast hosted by Politico’s Morning Money in Washington at 8 a.m.

    IN WASHINGTON, FEW LESSONS FROM THE HOUSING CRISIS  |  A lot has been learned about housing since the financial crisis, but those lessons do not seem to be reflected in a plan to remake how Americans buy homes, Jesse Eisinger of ProPublica writes in his column, The Trade. “Gingerly, Senators Bob Corker, Republican of Tennessee, and Mark R. Warner, Democrat of Virginia, have been working up a bill. Yet it’s striking how much the process is being dominated by emotional battles and financial interests,” Mr. Eisinger writes. The Corker-Warner plan calls for a government insurance operation for mortgage-backed securities, in which private investors would shoulder the first losses.

    “It’s an appealing notion and the plan has commendable aspects. But if the system worked as advertised, it could make the next housing crisis worse. To understand why, we should revisit what we have learned about the American housing and mortgage market.”

    Mergers & Acquisitions »

    Clearwire Endorses Dish’s Sweetened Bid  |  Clearwire switched its allegiance to Dish Network on Wednesday, recommending that shareholders accept its bid of $4.40 a share over a rival offer from Sprint Nextel. DealBook »

    The Management Buyout Path of Less Resistance  |  David H. Murdock’s effort to take the Dole Food Company private shows how a recent Delaware case has made these types of management buyouts easier, perhaps too easy, Steven M. Davidoff writes in the Deal Professor column. DealBook »

    Safeway to Sell Its Operations in Canada  |  The Canadian retailer Sobeys said on Wednesday that it would pay $5.8 billion in cash for the Canadian operations of Safeway, a move that would make it a leading grocery chain in western Canada. DealBook »

    Indian Tire Maker to Buy Cooper Tire for $2.5 Billion  |  The all-cash acquisition of Cooper Tire and Rubber would give Apollo Tyres of India a major foothold in the United States. DealBook »

    Malone May Play Role of Spoiler in Cable Deal  |  Vodafone has finally admitted it wants to buy Kabel Deutschland, Germany’s biggest cable operator, but John Malone, the pay-TV magnate behind Liberty Global, may have something to say about it, Quentin Webb of Reuters Breakingviews writes. REUTERS BREAKINGVIEWS

    INVESTMENT BANKING »

    Goldman Sachs to Finance Early Education Program  |  Through an experimental method of financing social services, the bank is lending up to $4.6 million for a preschool program in Salt Lake City. DealBook »

    In Hotel Deal, a Fight Over Preferred Shares  |  After a Goldman Sachs real estate fund acquired Equity Inns, a hotel owner, preferred shareholders have seen the value of their holdings plunge, setting up a dispute between the parties, The Wall Street Journal reports. WALL STREET JOURNAL

    A Warning From Merrill’s Former Leader  |  John A. Thain, former chief executive of Merrill Lynch, who now runs the CIT Group, told Bloomberg TV: “If you are asking about too big to fail and can what happened in 2008 could happen again, the answer is yes, it absolutely can happen again. If anything, too big to fail is a bigger problem because the biggest financial institutions are more concentrated today than they were. Dodd-Frank did not solve too big to fail.” BLOOMBERG TV

    Centerview Hires 2 Senior Media Bankers From Morgan Stanley  |  Centerview Partners said on Wednesday that it had hired two senior media bankers from Morgan Stanley, in the latest move by the boutique investment bank. DealBook »

    New Chief for GE Capital  |  Keith S. Sherin has been named chairman and chief executive of GE Capital, General Electric’s finance unit. DealBook »

    Wall Street Titans Celebrate UJA-Federation  |  The UJA-Federation of New York, a charitable organization focused on Jewish philanthropy, raised more than $2 million at a gala event at the Plaza Hotel on Tuesday. DealBook »

    PRIVATE EQUITY »

    Debt Levels Grow Higher in Private Equity Buyouts  |  The acquisition of BMC Software by investors led by Bain Capital and Golden Gate Capital illustrates that high levels of debt are returning to such deals, The Wall Street Journal writes. WALL STREET JOURNAL

    Blackstone Plans a Mutual Fund Product  |  “We have one product that’s going to be coming out, a mutual-fund complex,” Stephen A. Schwarzman, head of the Blackstone Group, said at a conference in New York, according to Bloomberg News. “This is getting slow and steady receptivity. This is more of an everyday-type offering.” BLOOMBERG NEWS

    After I.P.O., SeaWorld Initiates a Dividend  |  The 20-cent dividend per share will pay the Blackstone Group, SeaWorld’s majority owner, $20 million each quarter, The Wall Street Journal reports. WALL STREET JOURNAL

    HEDGE FUNDS »

    Paying for an Early Look at Market-Moving Data  |  In a practice that is legal, some investors pay for early access to economic reports from nongovernmental organizations, The Wall Street Journal reports. WALL STREET JOURNAL

    With Gift, Loeb Opposes Teachers Union  |  The hedge fund manager Daniel S. Loeb donated an additional $1 million to a group of charter schools to demonstrate his opposition to the president of the American Federation of Teachers, who he claims is leading an “attack” on hedge fund managers, according to Bloomberg News. BLOOMBERG NEWS

    Cohen Goes Mainstream  |  A decade ago, few outside of Wall Street had heard of Steven A. Cohen, the founder of SAC Capital Advisors. But as he faces an intensifying government investigation, Mr. Cohen, “for better or worse, has moved beyond the business pages to the popular press,” Matthew Goldstein writes in the Unstructured Finance blog of Reuters. REUTERS

    I.P.O./OFFERINGS »

    Coty Raises About $1 Billion in Its Public Debut  |  The cosmetics maker Coty priced its initial public offering at $17.50 a share on Wednesday, in the middle of its expected range of $16.50 to $18.50. DealBook »

    VENTURE CAPITAL »

    A Start-Up Benefits From TV Exposure  |  VerbalizeIt, a technology start-up that was featured on ABC’s “Shark Tank,” experienced a surge in new customers after its segment was aired, The New York Times reports. NEW YORK TIMES

    Kanye West’s Billion-Dollar Ambitions  |  “I think what Kanye West is going to mean is something similar to what Steve Jobs means,” the rapper tells Jon Caramanica of The New York Times. DealBook »

    LEGAL/REGULATORY »

    British Regulator Looking Into Currency Rates Trades  |  The Financial Conduct Authority of Britain says it is looking into claims that traders at large banks manipulated some foreign exchange benchmark rates. DealBook »

    The Murky World of Currency Traders  |  “If regulators can control matters it’s in ensuring that retail clients are not routinely disadvantaged by sub-optimal rates and poor spreads,” Izabella Kaminska writes in the Alphaville blog of The Financial Times, referring to the report that currency traders may have been manipulating rates. “But it’s no secret that retail clients have been suffering from less than optimal rates for years.” FT ALPHAVILLE

    British Lawmakers Take Aim at Google’s Tax Practices  |  “The company’s highly contrived tax arrangement has no purpose other than to enable the company to avoid U.K. corporation tax,” said Margaret Hodge, chairwoman of the Public Accounts Committee of Parliament, according to Reuters. REUTERS

    World Bank Predicts Slower but Smoother Growth  | 
    NEW YORK TIMES



    Royal Bank of Scotland Faces Questions About Direction

    LONDON - After years of restructuring and job cuts, Royal Bank of Scotland again finds itself confronted with an uncertain future.

    A day after Stephen Hester, the chief executive of the part-nationalized British lender, announced he was leaving the bank, investors expressed their displeasure over the surprise move, sending the bank’s shares down more than 6 percent in trading in London on Thursday.

    For many, the departure of Mr. Hester, a former Credit Suisse banker, raised concerns about how R.B.S. would navigate the British government’s planned share sale that could start as soon as the second half of next year.

    After leading a mistimed acquisition of the Dutch financial giant ABN Amro in 2007, R.B.S., based in Edinburgh, received a multi-billion dollar bailout from British taxpayers, leaving the government with an 81 percent holding.

    The stake, which is managed by government-owned UK Financial Investments, could take the rest of the decade to offload, and analysts warned that changing R.B.S.’s chief executive could add extra instability to the process.

    “This resignation adds to the existing political and regulatory uncertainty surrounding R.B.S.,” Citigroup analysts said in a research note to investors on Thursday. “One should not underestimate the time it will take for the UK Financial Investments to exit from the 81 percent stake.”

    Since the financial crisis began, R.B.S. has jettisoned around 900 billion ($1.4 trillion) worth of assets from its balance sheet, and cut roughly 40,000 jobs in a bid to bolster profitability.

    The British bank says it will now stop selling a number of complicated financial products, including equity derivatives, through its investment banking unit, which has been pared back significantly to reduce exposure to risky trading activity.

    The latest restructuring will lead to around 2,000 job cuts, or roughly 17 percent of the unit’s staff, mostly in Asia, according to a person with direct knowledge of the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly.

    The departure of Mr. Hester, 52, by the end of the year will leave the bank without many of its current senior executives ahead of its pending privatization. The bank’s chief financial officer, Bruce Van Saun, an American, also will leave his role at R.B.S. in September to lead the firm’s U.S. unit, Citizens Financial Group, ahead of its planned initial public offering in 2015.

    Analysts said a number of internal candidates, including the bank’s chief risk officer, Nathan Bostock, and the head of its non-core division, Rory Cullinan, could now be tapped for the top job at R.B.S.

    A spokesman for the British lender declined to comment, adding that the search for a new chief executive had just begun and would potentially include both internal and external candidates.

    R.B.S.’s chairman, Philip Hampton, said Mr. Hester’s departure had been as aimed at appointing a new leader who could oversee the privatization process from start to finish.

    Whoever takes over at the part-nationalized bank, the person must deal with attempts by its largest shareholder, the British government, to jump-start domestic growth by calling on local financial institutions to increase their lending to consumers and companies.

    While the taxpayers’ holding is controlled by a separate entity owned by the British government, questions remain whether R.B.S. can succeed in its restructuring when faced with political pressure over how the bank is run. The bank’s share price is currently around 40 percent below the so-called break-even point where local taxpayers would not lose money on R.B.S.’s bailout during the financial crisis.

    “We continue to argue that the political wrangling has significantly impacted the franchise, especially in R.B.S.’s markets business,” Espirito Santo analysts said in a research note on Thursday. “Given the political interference not many will relish the opportunity to run R.B.S.”