Total Pageviews

Bangkok Tycoon Offers $6.6 Billion for Thai Retailer

HONG KONG-CP All, the Thai operator of 7-11 convenience stores, owned by the billionaire Dhanin Chearavanont, said Tuesday it would pay more than $6 billion to acquire the discount retailer Siam Makro.

Under a two-stage deal, CP All said it would offer 343.24 billion baht, or $6.6 billion, for all the outstanding shares of Makro, which operates 57 membership- club based retail outlets around Thailand, as well as a chain of five small frozen food shops, Siam Frozen.

It is the second blockbuster acquisition in recent months for a company controlled by Mr. Chearavanont, whose Charoen Pokphand Group in February formally completed the $9.4 billion purchase of a 15.6 percent stake in China’s Ping An Insurance Group from HSBC Holdings.

The deal also follows another major takeover by another Thai billionaire, Charoen Sirivadhanabhakdi, a beverage magnate whose companies in January completed an $11.2 billion buyout of the Singaporean conglomerate Fraser & Neave.

In a Tuesday filing to the Stock Exchange of Thailand, CP All said it has reached an agreement to pay 787 baht, or $27.50, per share for the 64.4 percent of Makro owned by the SHV Holdings, a private, family-owned Dutch firm with businesses ranging from oil and natural gas production to private equity investing.

After the deal with SHV, CP All plans to launch a general offer to public shareholders of the remaining 35.6 percent stake at the same price.

The offer of 787 baht per share represents a 15.4 percent premium to Makro’s closing share price of 682 baht on Friday, when the stock was suspended from trading in Bangkok.



In Tax Fight, Amazon Hands Baton to eBay

Let’s rename it the eBay loophole.

For more than a decade, Amazon led a ferocious lobbying campaign in Washington against a law to force online merchants to collect state and municipal sales tax from their customers. Local and national retailers with brick-and-mortar stores complained that online merchants were enjoying a tax-free ride â€" they don’t have to collect state sales tax unless they have operations in the state â€" and getting an unfair advantage. The tax treatment was widely known as the Amazon loophole, until Amazon dropped its opposition of the tax. (More on why Amazon did that in a moment.)

In Amazon’s place has emerged its smaller rival, eBay, which has taken up the cause with a major campaign against the tax just as the issue is moving through Washington for the first time in earnest. On Monday, the bill cleared a procedural hurdle in the Senate, setting it up for a vote this week, and President Obama said he supported it.

Over the weekend, John Donahoe, eBay’s chief executive, sent out an audacious e-mail to tens of millions of eBay merchants, pleading with them to write their representatives in Congress to block the legislation.

“This legislation treats you and big multibillion-dollar online retailers â€" such as Amazon â€" exactly the same,” wrote Mr. Donahoe. “It may harm your ability to grow and costs jobs, including yours.”

Talk about being heavy-handed.

Most of eBay’s sellers have less than $1 million in out-of-state revenue and, under the terms of the proposal, the Marketplace Fairness Act, would be exempt from collecting the tax anyway.

It isn’t until the end of Mr. Donahoe’s letter that he argues for a compromise. If there is action, he wrote, the bill should be changed so that a small business is defined as making less than $10 million in out-of-state sales or having fewer than 50 employees. “To put that in perspective, Amazon does more than $10 million of sales every 90 minutes.”

Mr. Donahoe, who deserves credit for turning around eBay in recent years, isn’t trying to protect the mom-and-pop store or the struggling artist, he’s trying to keep substantial businesses with real revenue from paying taxes.

When I asked an eBay spokeswoman to quantify how many eBay sellers would be affected by the legislation if it were not raised to the $10 million cap, she said she did not have a number. (Considering the amount of money and energy eBay is spending on its lobbying effort, you’d think it would be able to quantify the cost.)

Part of eBay’s argument is that it is too complicated and expensive for small merchants to collect the tax. “Are you prepared to collect sales taxes in the more than 9,600 tax jurisdictions across the U.S.?” Mr. Donahoe asked.

What Mr. Donahoe did not mention is that Amazon will already collect this tax for merchants if they ask, and eBay will help provide them with third-party technology services that will help them do this, too. There are a number of companies that will manage and streamline the process, like Avalara or TaxCloud. And you have to believe that if the bill gets passed, there will be a cottage industry of companies that will offer services to collect the tax, including eBay, which has made a reputation trying to streamline the selling process for merchants. In fairness, eBay also argues that a cost of complying with enforcement will be a nightmare. Think about the prospect of an out-of-state tax audit.

Before we continue, a little history: the reason the online merchants don’t have to collect sales tax is a function of the Supreme Court ruling in 1992 in Quill Corporation v. North Dakota. In that case, Quill, a mail-order office equipment retailer, was sued over what North Dakota said was taxes due because Quill shipped products to the state. The court ruled that merchants did not have to collect taxes in a state unless they had a physical presence in the state. This covered mail-order businesses and, yes, the then-nascent business of Internet retailing. (Amazon didn’t even exist then.)

A note to readers, and to self: If you live in a state with a sales tax, you are supposed to submit uncollected taxes on Internet purchases at the end of the year, even if the merchant doesn’t seek it at the time of the sale. Of course, nobody does that.

At a time when states are desperate for revenue, you can see the allure of taxing online merchants. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, $23 billion is lost annually from out-of-state sales, a considerable portion from online transactions.

There’s an argument to made, which eBay does, that the sales tax is regressive for businesses â€" and it is. The tax does not discriminate between a large, national retailer and a mom-and-pop. The tax is flat. And big business already has special tax advantages: states often offer big companies tax incentives to build stores and distribution systems, benefits that are not offered to small businesses.

But on the flip side, there is an argument that the current state of sales taxes online is regressive for consumers. Poorer people are less likely to be able to benefit from being able to shop online.

So what about Amazon? Why did it abandon the fight?

Not because it felt altruistic. It was a business decision. As Amazon has grown, it has become better positioned to handle the tax hit. And perhaps more important, it is moving to build physical warehouse and shipping centers in many states so that it can offer faster delivery services, in some cases within 24 hours. That means it would most likely have had to collect sales tax anyway.

In the end, it is unclear whether the Republican-controlled House will approve tax legislation if it clears the Senate, as expected. But when consumers make purchases, either in a store or online, they should be prepared to pay the requisite sales tax. And, yes, merchants and lawmakers should provide the way to collect it.



S.E.C. Picks Ceresney and Canellos for Enforcement

The Securities and Exchange Commission ushered in a new era of leadership on Monday, appointing a former federal prosecutor turned defense lawyer to help run the unit that polices the front lines of financial fraud.

While the shake-up comes as the financial misdeeds of 2008 fade from view, the S.E.C.’s enforcement team will soon confront a fresh batch of challenges under its new leader, Andrew J. Ceresney.

Mr. Ceresney will inherit a unit that is on pace to file the lowest number of enforcement cases in a decade, according to S.E.C. figures provided to The New York Times. In the last six months, through March 31, the number of cases is down 23 percent from the same period a year ago â€" a sharp contrast from recent years when the agency trumpeted its record-high numbers.

Some longtime S.E.C. officials, who were not authorized to speak publicly, also question whether their focus on insider trading cases distracts from investigations of broader significance. What’s more, the officials say that the S.E.C. opened fewer investigations in the 2012 fiscal year than the previous year, presenting a potential obstacle to Mr. Ceresney, who will take the reins with George Canellos, an agency veteran.

The slowdown in cases could stem from any number of issues, including recent court rulings that curb the agency’s power.

Longtime enforcement officials, however, attribute the decline to low morale at the Washington office. They said that some enforcement lawyers were dusting off their résumés to move to the private sector.

“The enforcement division travels on raw enthusiasm,” said Stephen J. Crimmins, a partner at the law firm K&L Gates and a former enforcement official at the S.E.C. “When the troops are not enthused, things slow down.”

The S.E.C. argues that Mr. Ceresney will find high morale in the agency’s outposts, including its New York office. It also said that the enforcement numbers don’t tell the full story. A dwindling docket of cases is only natural, some officials say, as the agency clears out a backlog of cases stemming from the financial crisis.

“In recent years the division has achieved remarkable success prosecuting financial crisis cases, insider trading and other violations, while returning billions to harmed investors,” the agency said in a statement on Monday. The S.E.C. noted that, under Robert Khuzami, a revamped enforcement unit brought cases against more than 150 companies and individuals tied to the crisis.

Securities lawyers also say that it is common for the S.E.C. to suffer low morale amid a transition period. It was only a week ago that Mary Jo White, a longtime prosecutor and defense lawyer, took over as chairwoman.

Some lawyers say that Mr. Ceresney, her first major hire, could breathe new life into the enforcement unit. They note that he was Ms. White’s longtime lieutenant as both a corporate defense lawyer at Debevoise & Plimpton and earlier in his career as a federal prosecutor in Manhattan.

“He has an incredible ability to master the facts,” said Barry R. Goldsmith, a partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and the former chief litigation counsel at the S.E.C. who has worked on cases alongside Mr. Ceresney.

Ms. White announced on Monday that Mr. Ceresney would share the role with Mr. Canellos, who became the commission’s interim enforcement chief this year when Mr. Khuzami left the agency. Mr. Canellos, who served as a federal prosecutor under Ms. White when she was United States attorney in Manhattan, is also a friend and former colleague of Mr. Ceresney.

“I am excited to be charged with implementing Chairman White’s mandate of bold and unrelenting enforcement and thrilled to be teaming again with George,” Mr. Ceresney, 41, said in a statement.

Yet it is rare, if not unprecedented, for the enforcement unit to be run jointly.

And while Mr. Canellos is well liked, people close to the agency say, some S.E.C. commissioners objected to his bid for more power. The commissioners were particularly concerned with Mr. Canellos’s push to bolster the independence and authority of the enforcement unit, a move some investigators welcomed but might have isolated the commissioners from the investigative process.

He also irked some members of the S.E.C. trial team when he referred to them at an agency town hall meeting as “case killers,” employing an obscenity as an adjective, according to people who attended the event. Mr. Canellos later apologized.

Despite the concerns, the joint leadership is likely to be temporary, people briefed on the matter said. Mr. Canellos, who has been at the S.E.C. nearly four years, is expected to return to private practice before the end of 2013.

And some S.E.C. officials argued that Mr. Ceresney, a newcomer to the agency, would benefit from Mr. Canellos’s experience. He was instrumental, for example, in revamping the S.E.C.’s policy for how companies use social media.

“George is a brilliant lawyer, and a tremendous and inspirational leader,” said Andrew M. Calamari, head of the agency’s New York office.

In a statement, Ms. White added that “George and Andrew are two of the best lawyers and finest people I know.”

Still, Mr. Ceresney faces his share of challenges. His appointment, which does not require Senate approval, could renew concerns about a revolving door that shuttles S.E.C. lawyers from the government to the private sector, and back again.

While at Debevoise, Mr. Ceresney represented a number of the nation’s largest banks, including JPMorgan Chase during an inquiry involving its foreclosure practices. Mr. Ceresney is expected to recuse himself from cases involving his former clients.

The S.E.C.’s caseload presents another test for Mr. Ceresney. In addition to the dwindling number of actions, the S.E.C. is unlikely to catch any breaks from the courts. The Supreme Court recently rejected the agency’s argument that it should have additional time before the statute of limitations in fraud cases expires.

The agency has run into resistance in the lower courts as well. Judge Jed S. Rakoff of the Federal District Court, for example, has said the agency’s settlement with Citigroup “is neither fair, nor reasonable, nor adequate” in part because it did not include any admission of wrongdoing.

The enforcement unit’s own employees are also eager for new direction. Senior investigators were sidelined when Mr. Khuzami created specialized units to track complex corners of Wall Street after the financial crisis and Bernard L. Madoff’s Ponzi scheme.

Some officials have suggested abolishing the units, people briefed on the matter said. Others are proposing an expansion, hoping the agency will broaden its reach to thwart the next financial crisis.

“The commission went through a very tough time post-Madoff,” Mr. Goldsmith, the former S.E.C. chief litigation counsel, said. “People are looking beyond that to ask: so now what?”



S.E.C. Picks Ceresney and Canellos for Enforcement

The Securities and Exchange Commission ushered in a new era of leadership on Monday, appointing a former federal prosecutor turned defense lawyer to help run the unit that polices the front lines of financial fraud.

While the shake-up comes as the financial misdeeds of 2008 fade from view, the S.E.C.’s enforcement team will soon confront a fresh batch of challenges under its new leader, Andrew J. Ceresney.

Mr. Ceresney will inherit a unit that is on pace to file the lowest number of enforcement cases in a decade, according to S.E.C. figures provided to The New York Times. In the last six months, through March 31, the number of cases is down 23 percent from the same period a year ago â€" a sharp contrast from recent years when the agency trumpeted its record-high numbers.

Some longtime S.E.C. officials, who were not authorized to speak publicly, also question whether their focus on insider trading cases distracts from investigations of broader significance. What’s more, the officials say that the S.E.C. opened fewer investigations in the 2012 fiscal year than the previous year, presenting a potential obstacle to Mr. Ceresney, who will take the reins with George Canellos, an agency veteran.

The slowdown in cases could stem from any number of issues, including recent court rulings that curb the agency’s power.

Longtime enforcement officials, however, attribute the decline to low morale at the Washington office. They said that some enforcement lawyers were dusting off their résumés to move to the private sector.

“The enforcement division travels on raw enthusiasm,” said Stephen J. Crimmins, a partner at the law firm K&L Gates and a former enforcement official at the S.E.C. “When the troops are not enthused, things slow down.”

The S.E.C. argues that Mr. Ceresney will find high morale in the agency’s outposts, including its New York office. It also said that the enforcement numbers don’t tell the full story. A dwindling docket of cases is only natural, some officials say, as the agency clears out a backlog of cases stemming from the financial crisis.

“In recent years the division has achieved remarkable success prosecuting financial crisis cases, insider trading and other violations, while returning billions to harmed investors,” the agency said in a statement on Monday. The S.E.C. noted that, under Robert Khuzami, a revamped enforcement unit brought cases against more than 150 companies and individuals tied to the crisis.

Securities lawyers also say that it is common for the S.E.C. to suffer low morale amid a transition period. It was only a week ago that Mary Jo White, a longtime prosecutor and defense lawyer, took over as chairwoman.

Some lawyers say that Mr. Ceresney, her first major hire, could breathe new life into the enforcement unit. They note that he was Ms. White’s longtime lieutenant as both a corporate defense lawyer at Debevoise & Plimpton and earlier in his career as a federal prosecutor in Manhattan.

“He has an incredible ability to master the facts,” said Barry R. Goldsmith, a partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and the former chief litigation counsel at the S.E.C. who has worked on cases alongside Mr. Ceresney.

Ms. White announced on Monday that Mr. Ceresney would share the role with Mr. Canellos, who became the commission’s interim enforcement chief this year when Mr. Khuzami left the agency. Mr. Canellos, who served as a federal prosecutor under Ms. White when she was United States attorney in Manhattan, is also a friend and former colleague of Mr. Ceresney.

“I am excited to be charged with implementing Chairman White’s mandate of bold and unrelenting enforcement and thrilled to be teaming again with George,” Mr. Ceresney, 41, said in a statement.

Yet it is rare, if not unprecedented, for the enforcement unit to be run jointly.

And while Mr. Canellos is well liked, people close to the agency say, some S.E.C. commissioners objected to his bid for more power. The commissioners were particularly concerned with Mr. Canellos’s push to bolster the independence and authority of the enforcement unit, a move some investigators welcomed but might have isolated the commissioners from the investigative process.

He also irked some members of the S.E.C. trial team when he referred to them at an agency town hall meeting as “case killers,” employing an obscenity as an adjective, according to people who attended the event. Mr. Canellos later apologized.

Despite the concerns, the joint leadership is likely to be temporary, people briefed on the matter said. Mr. Canellos, who has been at the S.E.C. nearly four years, is expected to return to private practice before the end of 2013.

And some S.E.C. officials argued that Mr. Ceresney, a newcomer to the agency, would benefit from Mr. Canellos’s experience. He was instrumental, for example, in revamping the S.E.C.’s policy for how companies use social media.

“George is a brilliant lawyer, and a tremendous and inspirational leader,” said Andrew M. Calamari, head of the agency’s New York office.

In a statement, Ms. White added that “George and Andrew are two of the best lawyers and finest people I know.”

Still, Mr. Ceresney faces his share of challenges. His appointment, which does not require Senate approval, could renew concerns about a revolving door that shuttles S.E.C. lawyers from the government to the private sector, and back again.

While at Debevoise, Mr. Ceresney represented a number of the nation’s largest banks, including JPMorgan Chase during an inquiry involving its foreclosure practices. Mr. Ceresney is expected to recuse himself from cases involving his former clients.

The S.E.C.’s caseload presents another test for Mr. Ceresney. In addition to the dwindling number of actions, the S.E.C. is unlikely to catch any breaks from the courts. The Supreme Court recently rejected the agency’s argument that it should have additional time before the statute of limitations in fraud cases expires.

The agency has run into resistance in the lower courts as well. Judge Jed S. Rakoff of the Federal District Court, for example, has said the agency’s settlement with Citigroup “is neither fair, nor reasonable, nor adequate” in part because it did not include any admission of wrongdoing.

The enforcement unit’s own employees are also eager for new direction. Senior investigators were sidelined when Mr. Khuzami created specialized units to track complex corners of Wall Street after the financial crisis and Bernard L. Madoff’s Ponzi scheme.

Some officials have suggested abolishing the units, people briefed on the matter said. Others are proposing an expansion, hoping the agency will broaden its reach to thwart the next financial crisis.

“The commission went through a very tough time post-Madoff,” Mr. Goldsmith, the former S.E.C. chief litigation counsel, said. “People are looking beyond that to ask: so now what?”



S.E.C. Picks Ceresney and Canellos for Enforcement

The Securities and Exchange Commission ushered in a new era of leadership on Monday, appointing a former federal prosecutor turned defense lawyer to help run the unit that polices the front lines of financial fraud.

While the shake-up comes as the financial misdeeds of 2008 fade from view, the S.E.C.’s enforcement team will soon confront a fresh batch of challenges under its new leader, Andrew J. Ceresney.

Mr. Ceresney will inherit a unit that is on pace to file the lowest number of enforcement cases in a decade, according to S.E.C. figures provided to The New York Times. In the last six months, through March 31, the number of cases is down 23 percent from the same period a year ago â€" a sharp contrast from recent years when the agency trumpeted its record-high numbers.

Some longtime S.E.C. officials, who were not authorized to speak publicly, also question whether their focus on insider trading cases distracts from investigations of broader significance. What’s more, the officials say that the S.E.C. opened fewer investigations in the 2012 fiscal year than the previous year, presenting a potential obstacle to Mr. Ceresney, who will take the reins with George Canellos, an agency veteran.

The slowdown in cases could stem from any number of issues, including recent court rulings that curb the agency’s power.

Longtime enforcement officials, however, attribute the decline to low morale at the Washington office. They said that some enforcement lawyers were dusting off their résumés to move to the private sector.

“The enforcement division travels on raw enthusiasm,” said Stephen J. Crimmins, a partner at the law firm K&L Gates and a former enforcement official at the S.E.C. “When the troops are not enthused, things slow down.”

The S.E.C. argues that Mr. Ceresney will find high morale in the agency’s outposts, including its New York office. It also said that the enforcement numbers don’t tell the full story. A dwindling docket of cases is only natural, some officials say, as the agency clears out a backlog of cases stemming from the financial crisis.

“In recent years the division has achieved remarkable success prosecuting financial crisis cases, insider trading and other violations, while returning billions to harmed investors,” the agency said in a statement on Monday. The S.E.C. noted that, under Robert Khuzami, a revamped enforcement unit brought cases against more than 150 companies and individuals tied to the crisis.

Securities lawyers also say that it is common for the S.E.C. to suffer low morale amid a transition period. It was only a week ago that Mary Jo White, a longtime prosecutor and defense lawyer, took over as chairwoman.

Some lawyers say that Mr. Ceresney, her first major hire, could breathe new life into the enforcement unit. They note that he was Ms. White’s longtime lieutenant as both a corporate defense lawyer at Debevoise & Plimpton and earlier in his career as a federal prosecutor in Manhattan.

“He has an incredible ability to master the facts,” said Barry R. Goldsmith, a partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and the former chief litigation counsel at the S.E.C. who has worked on cases alongside Mr. Ceresney.

Ms. White announced on Monday that Mr. Ceresney would share the role with Mr. Canellos, who became the commission’s interim enforcement chief this year when Mr. Khuzami left the agency. Mr. Canellos, who served as a federal prosecutor under Ms. White when she was United States attorney in Manhattan, is also a friend and former colleague of Mr. Ceresney.

“I am excited to be charged with implementing Chairman White’s mandate of bold and unrelenting enforcement and thrilled to be teaming again with George,” Mr. Ceresney, 41, said in a statement.

Yet it is rare, if not unprecedented, for the enforcement unit to be run jointly.

And while Mr. Canellos is well liked, people close to the agency say, some S.E.C. commissioners objected to his bid for more power. The commissioners were particularly concerned with Mr. Canellos’s push to bolster the independence and authority of the enforcement unit, a move some investigators welcomed but might have isolated the commissioners from the investigative process.

He also irked some members of the S.E.C. trial team when he referred to them at an agency town hall meeting as “case killers,” employing an obscenity as an adjective, according to people who attended the event. Mr. Canellos later apologized.

Despite the concerns, the joint leadership is likely to be temporary, people briefed on the matter said. Mr. Canellos, who has been at the S.E.C. nearly four years, is expected to return to private practice before the end of 2013.

And some S.E.C. officials argued that Mr. Ceresney, a newcomer to the agency, would benefit from Mr. Canellos’s experience. He was instrumental, for example, in revamping the S.E.C.’s policy for how companies use social media.

“George is a brilliant lawyer, and a tremendous and inspirational leader,” said Andrew M. Calamari, head of the agency’s New York office.

In a statement, Ms. White added that “George and Andrew are two of the best lawyers and finest people I know.”

Still, Mr. Ceresney faces his share of challenges. His appointment, which does not require Senate approval, could renew concerns about a revolving door that shuttles S.E.C. lawyers from the government to the private sector, and back again.

While at Debevoise, Mr. Ceresney represented a number of the nation’s largest banks, including JPMorgan Chase during an inquiry involving its foreclosure practices. Mr. Ceresney is expected to recuse himself from cases involving his former clients.

The S.E.C.’s caseload presents another test for Mr. Ceresney. In addition to the dwindling number of actions, the S.E.C. is unlikely to catch any breaks from the courts. The Supreme Court recently rejected the agency’s argument that it should have additional time before the statute of limitations in fraud cases expires.

The agency has run into resistance in the lower courts as well. Judge Jed S. Rakoff of the Federal District Court, for example, has said the agency’s settlement with Citigroup “is neither fair, nor reasonable, nor adequate” in part because it did not include any admission of wrongdoing.

The enforcement unit’s own employees are also eager for new direction. Senior investigators were sidelined when Mr. Khuzami created specialized units to track complex corners of Wall Street after the financial crisis and Bernard L. Madoff’s Ponzi scheme.

Some officials have suggested abolishing the units, people briefed on the matter said. Others are proposing an expansion, hoping the agency will broaden its reach to thwart the next financial crisis.

“The commission went through a very tough time post-Madoff,” Mr. Goldsmith, the former S.E.C. chief litigation counsel, said. “People are looking beyond that to ask: so now what?”



Fed Still Owes Congress a Blueprint on Its Emergency Lending

After the Federal Reserve lent more than $1 trillion to big banks during the 2008 financial crisis, Congress required the central bank to devise specific ways of protecting taxpayers when doling out emergency loans to financial institutions.

But nearly three years after that overhaul became law, the Fed still has not established these regulations.

The delay involves a crucial but little-noticed part of the Dodd-Frank act, the sweeping financial sector overhaul that Congress passed in July 2010. One part of the legislation focused on the Fed. While the government used many different tools to shore up the financial system during the crisis, Congress was well aware that the Fed played a decisive role.

The central bank made huge loans to scores of domestic and foreign banks as markets seized up, dwarfing bailouts like the Troubled Asset Relief Program. But the identities of the borrowers were not disclosed at first, stoking concerns that the Fed had carried out a vast stealth bailout of Wall Street.

Against that backdrop, Dodd-Frank required the Fed to develop policies and procedures to safeguard taxpayers when making emergency loans “as soon as is practicable.” To some banking specialists, the delay suggests the Fed is stalling because it values the need to act freely in times of crisis.

“The Fed might be thinking, ‘We don’t want to make a lot of rules that might hinder us from acting in an emergency situation that we can’t anticipate,’ ” said Michael Bradfield, a former general counsel at the Fed.

When asked, Barbara Hagenbaugh, a spokeswoman for the Fed, did not say when the new rules would be completed.

Even without freshly written rules from the Fed, the Dodd-Frank legislation immediately introduced measures to make the central bank more accountable. For example, the Fed must now file regular and detailed reports to Congress if it undertakes any emergency lending.

Still, the overhaul went much further to set conditions on Fed loans during a crisis, and it is these measures that the central bank has yet to complete.

It has to have policies in place to prevent losses on emergency loans. For instance, the assets pledged to the Fed in return for the loans would have to be sufficient to absorb losses should the borrower default.

In an interesting twist, Congress also requested that when a bank participates in an emergency loan, its chief executive must certify that the bank is not insolvent at the time. The Fed would need to set out procedures for doing that.

“I think the Fed should have reasonably broad discretion to deal with systemic issues,” Mr. Bradfield said. “But then the question is, What’s systemic and what’s really needed, and what conditions ought to accompany that lending?”

A person familiar with the Fed’s thinking says any future emergency lending would still be bound by the demands of Dodd-Frank, even if the Fed has not issued rules by then. The central bank would still be obliged by the law to take careful steps to avoid losses, for instance.

Some banking analysts agree. “If something suddenly came up, they would make decisions based on Dodd-Frank, even if they had not previously published rules about how they would do this,” said Douglas J. Elliott, a fellow at the Brookings Institution.

Mr. Elliott also says the Fed may be focusing on writing other important rules stemming from Dodd-Frank. “It’s reasonable that they have not given a priority instead to a rule about a hypothetical future crisis,” he said.

Still, unlike other rules, whose writing requires cooperation with several other agencies, the Fed can complete these itself after consulting with the Treasury Department. In addition, these emergency lending guidelines are likely to be far less complicated than regulations like the Volcker Rule, which aims to define the types of trading that banks are allowed to do.

Senior Fed officials have already been voicing concern about aspects of the financial system that were shored up by crisis loans. For example, Daniel K. Tarullo, the Fed governor who oversees regulation, said in an interview with Bloomberg TV last week that he was still concerned about “too big to fail” banks borrowing in credit markets “that are subject to runs and liquidity freezes.”

Also last week, another Fed governor, Jeremy C. Stein, gave a speech that recognized one of the risks involved in the Fed’s emergency lending programs. He spoke about moral hazard, the belief that government support can subsidize banks and make them less careful about the dangers inherent in their businesses.

One way to help address the moral hazard problem would be for the Fed to come out with the new rules on emergency lending. Depending on how strict the rules are, the banks might then realize that the Fed will not be a pushover in times of market stress.

But the Fed may find it hard to formulate rules that allow it to stem market panics without bailing out undeserving institutions.

“You don’t want to put out rules that make you look vacuous and you don’t want to put out rules that tie your hands,” Mr. Bradfield said.

But whenever the rules appear, the Fed will face political scrutiny on such a contentious subject. “No rule about potential assistance from the Fed is going to be easy under the highly politicized conditions that exist today, with everything they do subject to criticism, especially if it helps financial institutions,” Mr. Elliott said.



Ralph Lauren Pays $1.6 Million to Resolve Bribery Case

The clothing retailer Ralph Lauren has agreed to pay about $1.6 million to resolve criminal and civil charges that it violated a federal law against making illegal payments to foreign officials, the latest case highlighting the government’s aggressive crackdown on overseas bribery by American companies.

Federal prosecutors and securities regulators announced Monday the settlement of actions against Ralph Lauren related to bribes paid to officials in Argentina from 2005 to 2009. The company discovered the misconduct in an internal audit and reported violations of the law, called the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, to the government, according to court filings.

Ralph Lauren signed two nonprosecution agreements to settle the actions, which were brought by the United States attorney in Brooklyn and the Securities and Exchange Commission. The company agreed to pay penalties of about $882,000 to the Justice Department and about $735,000 to the S.E.C.

S.E.C. officials went out of their way to praise Ralph Lauren for its assistance in the investigation. George S. Canellos, who was named the commission’s co-head of enforcement on Monday, said that the nonprosecution agreement showed that the S.E.C. “will confer substantial and tangible benefits” on assisting the government in foreign-bribery cases. It is the first such agreement that the commission has entered into involving the anti-foreign bribery laws.

“When you do all the right things in terms of investigating, self-reporting, cooperating, and taking appropriate remedial measures, both the S.E.C. and Department of Justice are willing to reward that behavior,” said Thomas A. Hanusik, a lawyer at Crowell & Moring who represented Ralph Lauren.

Enforcement of the once-obscure Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, a Watergate-era law that sat dormant for decades, has become a priority in Washington as American companies have expanded inexorably across the globe. Wal-Mart, for instance, is under investigation for possible violations of the law related to potential bribery in its Mexican operations, and the retail giant has disclosed that it is also conducting an internal inquiry into its businesses in Brazil, China, and India.

Last November, in an effort to clarify the foreign anti-corruption laws, the government issued a 120-page “resource guide” to help companies comply with the act. Business groups have railed against the law, criticizing it for chilling overseas business expansion and failing to provide companies with bright-line rules for how to conduct itself overseas. Foreign companies doing business in the United States, as well as those listed on American stock exchanges, also must comply with the statute.

Several lawmakers have criticized the Justice Department for not doing enough to enforce the law. Specifically, they argue that there are not enough prosecutions of individual executives. Most foreign bribery cases, including the latest one involving Ralph Lauren, are brought only against the companies. Critics say that the corporate fines are insufficient to deter such acts and are simply added to the cost of doing business overseas.

The problems at Ralph Lauren centered on misconduct at its Argentina subsidiary, which over a four-year period paid customs officials about $593,000 in bribes to import the company’s goods into the country. The illegal payments allowed the company to avoid customs inspections and related paperwork. A number of Argentine government officials were also given gifts, including the company’s coveted Ricky handbag, which today retails for as much as $22,500.

The bribes, said the company in a statement, were “wholly inconsistent with the culture of compliance and integrity that we have worked diligently to establish.”

Ralph Lauren has since closed its operations in Argentina, which has unusually strict import controls and is considered a difficult place for American corporations to do business. Federal regulators have brought several anti-bribery actions in recent years against companies doing business in Argentina, including the oil companies B.J. Services and Helmerich & Payne.



S.&P. Responds to Mortgage Ratings Case

Standard & Poor’s, accused of inflating its ratings to win business during the boom in mortgage investments, urged a judge on Monday to dismiss the federal government’s civil case against it, saying the Justice Department had built a faulty complaint on “isolated snippets” of conversation rather than evidence of real wrongdoing.

The ratings agency, the United States’ largest, was responding to fraud accusations filed in February in the first significant federal action against the ratings industry since the mortgage bubble burst. The Justice Department’s lawsuit accused S.&P. of knowingly giving complex packages of mortgages higher ratings than they deserved, stoking investor demand for the securities and driving up prices to where they crashed, setting off the global financial crisis.

“From start to finish, the complaint overreaches in targeting S.&P.,” the firm’s lawyers said in a brief filed in United States District Court for the Central District of California, in Los Angeles.

“S.&P.’s inability, together with the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and other market participants, to predict the extent of the most catastrophic meltdown since the Great Depression, reveals a lack of prescience, but not fraud,” the brief said. To have a valid case, the Justice Department would have had to demonstrate that Standard & Poor’s knew what the correct ratings should have been, it said, and it had not done so.

S.&P. is seeking to persuade Judge David O. Carter that the Justice Department does not have a case at all, and is not asking him consider the merits and rule on them. If Judge Carter rules against S.&P., the case will keep moving forward. A hearing is scheduled for May 20.

Separately, S.&P. has been seeking to have more than a dozen similar fraud complaints, filed in state courts by state attorneys general, moved into federal court and combined for pretrial purposes. The states are generally suing under their own state consumer protection statutes. The federal case, accusing fraud, would have a higher standard of proof.

The Justice Department had not yet issued a response.

Much of the Justice Department’s 128-page complaint deals with the fact that S.&P. promoted its ratings as “objective, independent,” and “uninfluenced by any conflicts of interest,” among other desirable qualities. The federal government then describes numerous messages and conversations among ratings analysts that suggest a lack of objectivity or independent thinking. The conversations took place between 2004 and 2006, and the Justice Department uses them to make its argument that Standard & Poor’s knew its ratings were false at the time that it issued them.

In its brief, S.&P. states that these “snippets” of conversation are devoid of meaning under the laws that govern fraud. It says that its many claims of objectivity, independence and “analytic excellence at all times” add up to “classic puffery,” the vague and overblown language that businesses often use to describe themselves as “the best,” even when no one has agreed on which product or service is best. S.&P. cited other cases in which such claims were found to be “non-actionable,” and said puffery was “too general to serve as the basis for a fraud claim.”

If Judge Carter rules in S.&P.’s favor on these boasts, the firm’s lawyers hope that all the damaging conversational snippets will also be thrown out. That would leave the final section of the Justice Department’s complaint, which lists 33 individual securities, called C.D.O.’s, or collateralized debt obligations, which were rated by S.&P. from March to October 2007.

The C.D.O.’s had been created by investment bankers by combining and rearranging other securities, which were composed, in turn, of many residential mortgages, including some that were classified as subprime.

The Justice Department noted that in the spring and summer of 2007, many subprime mortgages from certain years â€" known as vintages â€" had begun to have delinquencies; it also said the 33 C.D.O.’s in question contained mortgages from those vintages. It said S.&P. “deceived financial institutions that invested in these C.D.O.’s into believing that S.&P.’s ratings reflected its true current opinion regarding the credit risks of these C.D.O.’s, when in fact they did not,” Justice said in its complaint. It said the financial institutions lost more than $5 billion on the 33 C.D.O.’s.

But S.&P. argued in its brief that to have a valid claim of fraud, the Justice Department had to show how the particular residential-mortgage securities within the C.D.O.’s should have affected the ratings, and it did not do so.

“This failure is fatal to the government’s fraud claims,” the agency said in its brief.



ABB’s Moment in the Sun

ABB’s contrarian push into solar energy looks smart. The Swiss group is buying Nasdaq-listed Power-One for $1 billion in cash - a fully priced deal, given the solar industry’s current financial misery. But ABB insists Power-One occupies a sweet spot. That sounds plausible, and long term, the deal should add up.

The backdrop is gruesome. A glut of cheap Chinese kit has bankrupted firms from Germany’s Q-Cells to China’s own Suntech. Power-One does not make solar panels themselves, but solar inverters, which convert solar power to grid-ready electricity. But even here the picture is grim, especially in Europe, thanks to huge subsidy cuts and tariffs on Chinese imports. So bigger rival SMA Solar Technology warns the global inverter market will shrivel 19 percent in 2013.

The turmoil makes valuation tricky. ABB trumpets a reasonable-looking enterprise value ( of 6.4 times 2012 earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or Ebitda, once net cash of $266 million is included. But analysts polled by Starmine forecast Ebitda will plunge from $120 million last year to about $70 million this year - a pretty rich current-year enterprise value/Ebitda multiple of 10.7 times.

Look further out, though, and the sunlit uplands are dimly discernible. Upstarts will have more trouble competing in inverters than in panel-making. And demand for inverters should ultimately grow strongly, once cheaper panels make solar energy competitive with conventional energy sources.

ABB should also be able to reap cost savings and extra sales, by plugging Power-One into its global network. It can spend to reduce the business’s heavy reliance on Europe - a switch Power-One would struggle to fund on its own. This could yet prove to be a shrewdly timed acquisition.

This is the third sizeable U.S. company ABB has taken over in as many years, after Baldor and later Thomas & Betts, worth roughly $4 billion apiece. Under its chief executive, Joe Hogan, ABB has expanded in the United States and cut its dependence on tougher businesses like transformers. The market does not seem entirely convinced: ABB still trades 19 percent below its median 10-year price-earnings multiple. But at least Mr. Hogan is taking action, while other European blue-chips are still hunkering down.

Quentin Webb is a columnist for Reuters Breakingviews. For more independent commentary and analysis, visit breakingviews.com.



Deductive Reasoning Can Be a Dangerous Thing

A recent case involving a Canadian investment banker raises an interesting question about whether a person’s own intuition about a merger constitutes illegal insider trading charge. The answer becomes even more difficult when two securities regulators reach different conclusions about whether there was any confidential information involved.

The Securities and Exchange Commission in the United States and Canada’s Ontario Securities Commission filed separate cases against Richard Bruce Moore, who had worked at Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. He agreed to settlements with each, paying about $850,000 and accepting restrictions on any future work in the securities industry.

The trading involved Tomkins, a British maker of car parts, before it received a takeover offer in July 2010 that led its stock price to rise nearly 30 percent. The circumstances by which Mr. Moore gathered the information about the offer make it hard to find any clear line that separates good deductive reasoning from illegal trading.

At the time, one of Mr. Moore’s clients was the Canadian Pension Plan Investment Board, which was planning an offer for Tomkins along with a private equity firm. Mr. Moore regularly dealt with one of the pension plan’s senior representatives about providing investment banking services. He learned there was a significant transaction involving the pension board, but that C.I.B.C. would not be involved in it.

Over the course of the next few months, Mr. Moore gleaned additional tidbits about the transaction from his interactions with the pension board representative. In this case, no one tipped him off about the deal, at least not in the traditional sense. In essence, he put two and two together after he saw the pension board representative speaking with someone at a charity event, and the representative refused to introduce them or even identify who he was speaking with. A short time later, another person identified the unknown person as the chief executive of Tomkins.

Having figured out the likely target of the deal, the next day Mr. Moore started buying Tomkins stock through an offshore account, ultimately putting approximately one-third of his net worth into its shares. His trades included buying American depositary receipts in the company that were traded on the New York Stock Exchange, which gave the S.E.C. jurisdiction over the case.

Under United States law, the so-called misappropriation theory of insider trading requires proof that a defendant took information from a party to whom he owed a fiduciary duty and then converted it to his own use by trading. In its complaint, the S.E.C. claimed that by pulling together different strands of information about the impending deal from a client, Mr. Moore “misappropriated that information from his employer by purchasing Tomkins securities.”

The Ontario Securities Commission, however, took a different path in concluding that Mr. Moore traded improperly in Tomkins shares. In its settlement with Mr. Moore, it stated that at no time did the pension board representative “ever provide Moore with any material, generally undisclosed information.”

Instead, the regulator said he “ought not to have made use of information obtained in part by virtue of his position as an employee of a registrant prior to its general disclosure to the public.” In doing so, the commission said, Mr. Moore acted “contrary to the public interest.”

Unlike the S.E.C., the Ontario commission did not find that he engaged in insider trading, but only that he acted inappropriately given his position in the securities industry. This is in part a result of a limitation in Section 76 of the Ontario Securities Act, which requires that a defendant be “in a special relationship with a reporting issuer” when trading in its securities to violate the law.

Was the information on which Mr. Moore traded really a breach of a fiduciary duty to C.I.B.C. under the misappropriation theory?

The transactions have many hallmarks of insider trading: a quick purchase of shares shortly after gaining information, resulting in a quick profit. Moreover, this is the type of “all in” bet involving a significant amount of a defendant’s net worth that shows a belief that the information was quite valuable. Add to that Mr. Moore’s position in the securities industry, and this seems to add up to an insider trading case.

Yet, Mr. Moore did not obtain any confidential information from a source at the pension board about the Tomkins offer, as the Canadian authorities make clear. Seeing someone at an event and making deductions based on circumspect conduct about the identity of a corporate executive is hardly the type of confidential information normally identified as the basis for an insider trading charge.

Nor did Mr. Moore use information provided to C.I.B.C. for his trading because the bank was not a participant in the transaction. The only basis on which one could say that Mr. Moore misused his employer’s confidential information would be to use the legal fiction that everything he knew was attributable to his employer and therefore his use of it somehow resulted in a breach of fiduciary duty. In other words, he misappropriated the information from himself.

While that is a pretty convoluted theory of insider trading, it looks as if the S.E.C. is saying that using your job to deduce something going on at another company that is your client can be enough to violate the insider trading prohibition. In a sense, the S.E.C. seems to be applying the theory of “if it quacks like a duck” then it must be insider trading.

To add another layer to the intrigue, Mr. Moore’s settlement with the Ontario commission included a description of real insider trading when he bought shares in a different company that was being advised by an investment bank where he was working after leaving C.I.B.C. His apparent willingness to abuse his position would have made it difficult to defend charges related to his trading in Tomkins.

The S.E.C.’s case shows that it continues to take an aggressive approach to insider trading, pushing the limits of when transactions based on a person’s special access to important information can be enough to pursue charges. The deduction should be fairly simple: be very careful when you figure out something about a company and then try to take advantage of it by going all in to generate a quick profit.



Deductive Reasoning Can Be a Dangerous Thing

A recent case involving a Canadian investment banker raises an interesting question about whether a person’s own intuition about a merger constitutes illegal insider trading charge. The answer becomes even more difficult when two securities regulators reach different conclusions about whether there was any confidential information involved.

The Securities and Exchange Commission in the United States and Canada’s Ontario Securities Commission filed separate cases against Richard Bruce Moore, who had worked at Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. He agreed to settlements with each, paying about $850,000 and accepting restrictions on any future work in the securities industry.

The trading involved Tomkins, a British maker of car parts, before it received a takeover offer in July 2010 that led its stock price to rise nearly 30 percent. The circumstances by which Mr. Moore gathered the information about the offer make it hard to find any clear line that separates good deductive reasoning from illegal trading.

At the time, one of Mr. Moore’s clients was the Canadian Pension Plan Investment Board, which was planning an offer for Tomkins along with a private equity firm. Mr. Moore regularly dealt with one of the pension plan’s senior representatives about providing investment banking services. He learned there was a significant transaction involving the pension board, but that C.I.B.C. would not be involved in it.

Over the course of the next few months, Mr. Moore gleaned additional tidbits about the transaction from his interactions with the pension board representative. In this case, no one tipped him off about the deal, at least not in the traditional sense. In essence, he put two and two together after he saw the pension board representative speaking with someone at a charity event, and the representative refused to introduce them or even identify who he was speaking with. A short time later, another person identified the unknown person as the chief executive of Tomkins.

Having figured out the likely target of the deal, the next day Mr. Moore started buying Tomkins stock through an offshore account, ultimately putting approximately one-third of his net worth into its shares. His trades included buying American depositary receipts in the company that were traded on the New York Stock Exchange, which gave the S.E.C. jurisdiction over the case.

Under United States law, the so-called misappropriation theory of insider trading requires proof that a defendant took information from a party to whom he owed a fiduciary duty and then converted it to his own use by trading. In its complaint, the S.E.C. claimed that by pulling together different strands of information about the impending deal from a client, Mr. Moore “misappropriated that information from his employer by purchasing Tomkins securities.”

The Ontario Securities Commission, however, took a different path in concluding that Mr. Moore traded improperly in Tomkins shares. In its settlement with Mr. Moore, it stated that at no time did the pension board representative “ever provide Moore with any material, generally undisclosed information.”

Instead, the regulator said he “ought not to have made use of information obtained in part by virtue of his position as an employee of a registrant prior to its general disclosure to the public.” In doing so, the commission said, Mr. Moore acted “contrary to the public interest.”

Unlike the S.E.C., the Ontario commission did not find that he engaged in insider trading, but only that he acted inappropriately given his position in the securities industry. This is in part a result of a limitation in Section 76 of the Ontario Securities Act, which requires that a defendant be “in a special relationship with a reporting issuer” when trading in its securities to violate the law.

Was the information on which Mr. Moore traded really a breach of a fiduciary duty to C.I.B.C. under the misappropriation theory?

The transactions have many hallmarks of insider trading: a quick purchase of shares shortly after gaining information, resulting in a quick profit. Moreover, this is the type of “all in” bet involving a significant amount of a defendant’s net worth that shows a belief that the information was quite valuable. Add to that Mr. Moore’s position in the securities industry, and this seems to add up to an insider trading case.

Yet, Mr. Moore did not obtain any confidential information from a source at the pension board about the Tomkins offer, as the Canadian authorities make clear. Seeing someone at an event and making deductions based on circumspect conduct about the identity of a corporate executive is hardly the type of confidential information normally identified as the basis for an insider trading charge.

Nor did Mr. Moore use information provided to C.I.B.C. for his trading because the bank was not a participant in the transaction. The only basis on which one could say that Mr. Moore misused his employer’s confidential information would be to use the legal fiction that everything he knew was attributable to his employer and therefore his use of it somehow resulted in a breach of fiduciary duty. In other words, he misappropriated the information from himself.

While that is a pretty convoluted theory of insider trading, it looks as if the S.E.C. is saying that using your job to deduce something going on at another company that is your client can be enough to violate the insider trading prohibition. In a sense, the S.E.C. seems to be applying the theory of “if it quacks like a duck” then it must be insider trading.

To add another layer to the intrigue, Mr. Moore’s settlement with the Ontario commission included a description of real insider trading when he bought shares in a different company that was being advised by an investment bank where he was working after leaving C.I.B.C. His apparent willingness to abuse his position would have made it difficult to defend charges related to his trading in Tomkins.

The S.E.C.’s case shows that it continues to take an aggressive approach to insider trading, pushing the limits of when transactions based on a person’s special access to important information can be enough to pursue charges. The deduction should be fairly simple: be very careful when you figure out something about a company and then try to take advantage of it by going all in to generate a quick profit.



One for the Rhodes

Stephen A. Schwarzman is giving something back - to China. The Blackstone founder is contributing his name, and $100 million of his private wealth, to kick-start a scholarship program at Beijing’s Tsinghua University. The program may not be entirely philanthropic: China lost much more investing in his buyout firm’s initial public offering. But there will still be many beneficiaries if it helps Western and Chinese elites understand each other better.

Like the Rhodes Scholarship that inspired it, Mr. Schwarzman’s program will fund the brightest and best to study overseas. In this case, the $300 million programme will select some 200 “Schwarzman Scholars” from the United States, China and other countries to spend a year studying at Tsinghua. Whereas Cecil Rhodes wanted future leaders to visit his alma mater of Oxford University, Mr. Schwarzman is sending them abroad to gain a better understanding of the world’s rising economic and political power.

There is bound to be skepticism. Mr. Schwarzman’s $100 million pales next to the losses China’s sovereign fund made when it invested $3 billion in buyout firm Blackstone in 2007. Though the shares have recovered somewhat from the depths of the financial crisis, China Investment Corporation is still nursing nearly a $1 billion loss. Corporate sponsors such as BP, Boeing and Bank of America will no doubt view the program as a way to improve their influence on the mainland. And the heavyweight dvisory board â€" which includes the likes of Tony Blair, Nicolas Sarkozy and Henry M. Paulson Jr. â€" is also noticeably light on Chinese luminaries of equal stature.

Yet these objections do not undermine Mr. Schwarzman’s cause. China’s rapid rise and insular tendencies mean the country’s leaders have little experience and understanding of their counterparts elsewhere. For Western leaders, the country remains mysterious and impenetrable. That has already led to tensions, which are only likely to increase as China flexes its growing economic and political might. If Mr. Schwarzman’s program helps future leaders gain a better understanding of each other, any less high-minded motivations will be forgotten.

Peter Thal Larsen is Asia editor at at Reuters Breakingviews. For more independent commentary and analysis, visit breakingviews.com.



One for the Rhodes

Stephen A. Schwarzman is giving something back - to China. The Blackstone founder is contributing his name, and $100 million of his private wealth, to kick-start a scholarship program at Beijing’s Tsinghua University. The program may not be entirely philanthropic: China lost much more investing in his buyout firm’s initial public offering. But there will still be many beneficiaries if it helps Western and Chinese elites understand each other better.

Like the Rhodes Scholarship that inspired it, Mr. Schwarzman’s program will fund the brightest and best to study overseas. In this case, the $300 million programme will select some 200 “Schwarzman Scholars” from the United States, China and other countries to spend a year studying at Tsinghua. Whereas Cecil Rhodes wanted future leaders to visit his alma mater of Oxford University, Mr. Schwarzman is sending them abroad to gain a better understanding of the world’s rising economic and political power.

There is bound to be skepticism. Mr. Schwarzman’s $100 million pales next to the losses China’s sovereign fund made when it invested $3 billion in buyout firm Blackstone in 2007. Though the shares have recovered somewhat from the depths of the financial crisis, China Investment Corporation is still nursing nearly a $1 billion loss. Corporate sponsors such as BP, Boeing and Bank of America will no doubt view the program as a way to improve their influence on the mainland. And the heavyweight dvisory board â€" which includes the likes of Tony Blair, Nicolas Sarkozy and Henry M. Paulson Jr. â€" is also noticeably light on Chinese luminaries of equal stature.

Yet these objections do not undermine Mr. Schwarzman’s cause. China’s rapid rise and insular tendencies mean the country’s leaders have little experience and understanding of their counterparts elsewhere. For Western leaders, the country remains mysterious and impenetrable. That has already led to tensions, which are only likely to increase as China flexes its growing economic and political might. If Mr. Schwarzman’s program helps future leaders gain a better understanding of each other, any less high-minded motivations will be forgotten.

Peter Thal Larsen is Asia editor at at Reuters Breakingviews. For more independent commentary and analysis, visit breakingviews.com.



Schwarzman’s Scholarship in China

Stephen A. Schwarzman, head of the Blackstone Group, is creating a $300 million scholarship for study at a Chinese university “that he hopes will rival the Rhodes scholarship in prestige and influence,” The New York Times reports. Backed by a group of mostly Western blue-chip companies with interests in China, the Schwarzman Scholars program, whose endowment is one of the largest single gifts to education in the world, will pay for 200 students every year from around the globe to attend a one-year master’s program at Tsinghua University in Beijing.

“The program’s creation underlines the tremendous importance of China and its market to Wall Street financiers and corporate leaders, who have become increasingly anxious as security and economic frictions grow between China and the West,” The Times writes. A third of the endowment comes from Mr. Schwarzman’s personal fortune, a third comes from donors and the remaining $100 million is expected to be raised by the end of this year, according to Mr. Schwarzman.

As long as the Chinese economy continues to grow two to three times as quickly as the American economy, and European growth remains sluggish, tensions are likely to rise, Mr. Schwarzman said. “The idea was to deal with this problem in a generational manner,” he said in a video interview with The Times.

NEW LEADERSHIP FOR S.E.C. ENFORCEMENT UNIT  |  Mary Jo White, the new leader of the Securities and Exchange Commission, is expected to name Andrew J. Ceresney as co-head of the agency’s enforcement arm, DealBook’s Ben Protess and Peter Lattman report. Mr. Ceresney, a longtime lieutenant to Ms. White both at Debevoise & Plimpton and earlier in his career as a federal prosecutor in Manhattan, is expected to share the S.E.C. role with George S. Canellos, who became the interim enforcement chief last year.

“It is unusual, if not unprecedented, for the enforcement unit to be run jointly. The joint leadership is likely to be temporary though, people briefed on the matter said, as Mr. Canellos, who has been at the S.E.C. nearly four years, is expected to return to private practice well before the end of President Obama’s second term.”

TRUST DESIGNATION IS HOT CORPORATE TREND  |  Businesses as diverse as private prisons, billboards and casinos are declaring new identities as real estate trusts, in an aggressive move to reduce their federal tax bills, Nathaniel Popper writes in The New York Times. “The trust structure has been around for years but, until recently, it was generally used only by funds holding real estate. Now, the likes of the Corrections Corporation of America, which owns and operates 44 prisons and detention centers across the nation, have quietly received permission from the Internal Revenue Service to put on new corporate clothes and, as a result, save many millions on taxes.”

One Wall Street analyst characterized the real estate investment trust designation as a “golden ticket” for corporations. “I’ve been in this business for 30 years, and I’ve never seen the interest in REIT conversions as high as it is today,” said Robert O’Brien, the head of the real estate practice at Deloitte & Touche.

ON THE AGENDA  |  Data on existing home sales for March is out at 10 a.m. Caterpillar reports earnings before the market opens, while Netflix reports earnings on Monday evening. Gregory J. Fleming, head of Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, is on CNBC at 7 a.m. Barry Rosenstein of Jana Partners is on CNBC at 11:15 a.m.

EUROPE’S CARBON MARKET SPUTTERS  |  The carbon market in Europe, “a pioneering effort to use markets to regulate greenhouse gases, is having a hard time staying upright. This year has been stomach-churning for the people who make their living in the arcane world of trading emissions permits,” The New York Times writes. “More important, though, than lost jobs and diminished payouts for traders and bankers, the penny ante price of carbon credits means the market is not doing its job: pushing polluters to reduce carbon emissions, which most climate scientists believe contribute to global warming. ”

COHEN’S REAL ESTATE DEALINGS  |  Steven A. Cohen is on something of a real estate shopping spree, according to a report in The New York Post. Already, Mr. Cohen has bought a Hamptons property for $60 million, as his hedge fund SAC Capital Advisors contends with government scrutiny of its trading. In addition, according to The Post, Mr. Cohen “snapped up 145 Perry St. in the West Village for $38.8 million, according to public records of the sale.” The newspaper continues: “There is chatter he bought another city apartment, this one at the Abingdon, also in the West Village, while he renovates 145 Perry.”

Mergers & Acquisitions »

ABB to Buy Power-One for $1 Billion  |  The Swiss engineering company ABB has agreed to buy the American renewable energy firm Power-One for $1 billion. DealBook »

Koch Brothers Turn to Newspapers  |  Koch Industries, the private company of which Charles G. Koch is chairman and chief executive, is exploring a bid for the Tribune Company’s eight regional newspapers, in line with a broader media strategy, The New York Times reports. NEW YORK TIMES

Investor Challenges a Move by Occidental Petroleum  |  Steven Romick, managing partner of First Pacific Advisors, is among investors calling for more scrutiny of the board of Occidental Petroleum, the oil and gas exploration and production company based in Los Angeles, Gretchen Morgenson writes in her column for The New York Times. NEW YORK TIMES

Elan Rejects Reduced Bid From Royalty Pharma  | 
REUTERS

Dell Shares Fall Below Buyout Offer Price  |  Dell’s stock fell nearly 4 percent on Friday to close below the $13.65-a-share offer made by the company’s founder, Michael S. Dell, and Silver Lake Partners to take the company private. DealBook »

Anheuser-Busch Reaches Deal With Antitrust Regulators  |  Anheuser-Busch InBev said it had received government approval for its $20.1 billion deal to buy control of Grupo Modelo, the maker of Corona. DealBook »

INVESTMENT BANKING »

With Concerns About Oversight, Banks Leave Certain Regions  |  The Financial Times reports: “Some of the world’s biggest commercial banks are pulling back from selected operations in fast-growing markets in the Middle East and parts of Asia, fearing they may fall foul of tightening rules on anti-money laundering.” FINANCIAL TIMES

Wall Street Tangles With States on Social Media Rules  |  “An unlikely alliance of regulators and industry groups is seeking to carve out exemptions in state laws that would allow certain financial firms to sidestep bans on looking at the personal social-media accounts of employees,” The Wall Street Journal writes. WALL STREET JOURNAL

Mexican Plan Aims to Encourage Lending  | 
REUTERS

Credit Suisse Embraces the Dark Side of Trading  |  Credit Suisse, the operator of the nation’s largest dark pool, has told the major industry data providers that it will no longer provide information on how much trading happens in its pool, CrossFinder. DealBook »

PRIVATE EQUITY »

For Silver Lake, Reducing Dell Bid Would Be Costly  |  It would cost $750 million for Silver Lake and Michael S. Dell to get out of their current deal to buy the computer maker, Bloomberg News notes. On Friday, shares of Dell fell below the $13.65-a-share offer. BLOOMBERG NEWS

Betfair, an Online Gambling Firm, Rejects Offer Led by CVC  | 
REUTERS

HEDGE FUNDS »

Tepper Said to Buy Debt of Energy Future Holdings  |  David Tepper’s Appaloosa Management “has recently accumulated a small position in debt securities of Energy Future Holdings,” the troubled Texas power company, in a bet that “the company will not file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection soon,” The Financial Times writes. FINANCIAL TIMES

Paulson’s Bullish Argument on Gold  |  John A. Paulson’s firm said in a letter to clients, according to Bloomberg News: “Although inflation and inflation expectations remain subdued, which appears to have dampened the appetite for gold so far this year, we believe that ongoing central bank purchases and strong gold demand from China and India will help support the gold price in the near term.” BLOOMBERG NEWS

Hedge Funds Buy More Gold as Prices Fall  | 
BLOOMBERG NEWS

I.P.O./OFFERINGS »

SeaWorld C.E.O. Hints at Overseas Ambitions  |  While the majority of the proceeds from SeaWorld’s successful I.P.O. go to the Blackstone Group, SeaWorld is using its share of the money to reduce its debt, and, in general, to help it achieve its corporate goals. DealBook »

SeaWorld Shares Close Up 24% in Trading Debut  |  The Blackstone Group’s theme-park operator made a splash on Friday in its debut as a publicly traded company. DealBook »

VENTURE CAPITAL »

Eventbrite Attracts $60 Million  |  The ticketing company Eventbrite has raised $60 million from T. Rowe Price and Tiger Global Management, “making it the latest example of a start-up to raise significant private late-stage funding that puts off an initial public offering,” The Wall Street Journal reports. WALL STREET JOURNAL

Tech Boom Drives a Favorite Hangout to Close  |  The Grove restaurant in San Francisco said it was closing its flagship location on Chestnut Street because of untenable rents, “driven up, in large part, because of the well-paid techies who chow down on its huevos rancheros every day,” the Bits blog writes. NEW YORK TIMES BITS

Cyberattacks a Huge Threat to Start-Ups, and Their Investors  |  The hacking of major banks and technology giants garner headlines, but it is the tech-driven start-ups and growth companies that can stand to lose their entire business if they are victims of cyberattacks, write Craig A. Newman and Daniel L. Stein, litigation partners with Richards Kibbe & Orbe. DealBook »

LEGAL/REGULATORY »

Bernanke Said to Be Missing Jackson Hole  |  Ben S. Bernanke, the Federal Reserve chairman, “will miss the annual Jackson Hole monetary policy symposium this year due to a scheduling conflict,” according to Reuters. REUTERS

European Leaders May Be Heeding Call to Spur Growth  |  After the annual meeting of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, high-ranking ministers and officials were “talking up the need to slow the pace of budget cutting and bolster growth on the Continent,” The New York Times writes. NEW YORK TIMES

Morris J. Kramer, Pioneer in Deal Law, Dies at 71  |  Morris J. Kramer, who as a longtime partner at the law firm of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom helped revolutionize the practice of advising on mergers and acquisitions, died on Friday in Manhattan. He was 71.DealBook »

Barclays Employee Named in Libor Case Leaves the Bank  | 
WALL STREET JOURNAL

No Need for 2 Tracks in Money Market Overhaul  |  It is not clear why there needs to be two sets of rules for money market funds that invest in government debt and those that buy corporate debt, Agnes T. Crane writes for Reuters Breakingviews. REUTERS BREAKINGVIEWS



Schwarzman’s Scholarship in China

Stephen A. Schwarzman, head of the Blackstone Group, is creating a $300 million scholarship for study at a Chinese university “that he hopes will rival the Rhodes scholarship in prestige and influence,” The New York Times reports. Backed by a group of mostly Western blue-chip companies with interests in China, the Schwarzman Scholars program, whose endowment is one of the largest single gifts to education in the world, will pay for 200 students every year from around the globe to attend a one-year master’s program at Tsinghua University in Beijing.

“The program’s creation underlines the tremendous importance of China and its market to Wall Street financiers and corporate leaders, who have become increasingly anxious as security and economic frictions grow between China and the West,” The Times writes. A third of the endowment comes from Mr. Schwarzman’s personal fortune, a third comes from donors and the remaining $100 million is expected to be raised by the end of this year, according to Mr. Schwarzman.

As long as the Chinese economy continues to grow two to three times as quickly as the American economy, and European growth remains sluggish, tensions are likely to rise, Mr. Schwarzman said. “The idea was to deal with this problem in a generational manner,” he said in a video interview with The Times.

NEW LEADERSHIP FOR S.E.C. ENFORCEMENT UNIT  |  Mary Jo White, the new leader of the Securities and Exchange Commission, is expected to name Andrew J. Ceresney as co-head of the agency’s enforcement arm, DealBook’s Ben Protess and Peter Lattman report. Mr. Ceresney, a longtime lieutenant to Ms. White both at Debevoise & Plimpton and earlier in his career as a federal prosecutor in Manhattan, is expected to share the S.E.C. role with George S. Canellos, who became the interim enforcement chief last year.

“It is unusual, if not unprecedented, for the enforcement unit to be run jointly. The joint leadership is likely to be temporary though, people briefed on the matter said, as Mr. Canellos, who has been at the S.E.C. nearly four years, is expected to return to private practice well before the end of President Obama’s second term.”

TRUST DESIGNATION IS HOT CORPORATE TREND  |  Businesses as diverse as private prisons, billboards and casinos are declaring new identities as real estate trusts, in an aggressive move to reduce their federal tax bills, Nathaniel Popper writes in The New York Times. “The trust structure has been around for years but, until recently, it was generally used only by funds holding real estate. Now, the likes of the Corrections Corporation of America, which owns and operates 44 prisons and detention centers across the nation, have quietly received permission from the Internal Revenue Service to put on new corporate clothes and, as a result, save many millions on taxes.”

One Wall Street analyst characterized the real estate investment trust designation as a “golden ticket” for corporations. “I’ve been in this business for 30 years, and I’ve never seen the interest in REIT conversions as high as it is today,” said Robert O’Brien, the head of the real estate practice at Deloitte & Touche.

ON THE AGENDA  |  Data on existing home sales for March is out at 10 a.m. Caterpillar reports earnings before the market opens, while Netflix reports earnings on Monday evening. Gregory J. Fleming, head of Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, is on CNBC at 7 a.m. Barry Rosenstein of Jana Partners is on CNBC at 11:15 a.m.

EUROPE’S CARBON MARKET SPUTTERS  |  The carbon market in Europe, “a pioneering effort to use markets to regulate greenhouse gases, is having a hard time staying upright. This year has been stomach-churning for the people who make their living in the arcane world of trading emissions permits,” The New York Times writes. “More important, though, than lost jobs and diminished payouts for traders and bankers, the penny ante price of carbon credits means the market is not doing its job: pushing polluters to reduce carbon emissions, which most climate scientists believe contribute to global warming. ”

COHEN’S REAL ESTATE DEALINGS  |  Steven A. Cohen is on something of a real estate shopping spree, according to a report in The New York Post. Already, Mr. Cohen has bought a Hamptons property for $60 million, as his hedge fund SAC Capital Advisors contends with government scrutiny of its trading. In addition, according to The Post, Mr. Cohen “snapped up 145 Perry St. in the West Village for $38.8 million, according to public records of the sale.” The newspaper continues: “There is chatter he bought another city apartment, this one at the Abingdon, also in the West Village, while he renovates 145 Perry.”

Mergers & Acquisitions »

ABB to Buy Power-One for $1 Billion  |  The Swiss engineering company ABB has agreed to buy the American renewable energy firm Power-One for $1 billion. DealBook »

Koch Brothers Turn to Newspapers  |  Koch Industries, the private company of which Charles G. Koch is chairman and chief executive, is exploring a bid for the Tribune Company’s eight regional newspapers, in line with a broader media strategy, The New York Times reports. NEW YORK TIMES

Investor Challenges a Move by Occidental Petroleum  |  Steven Romick, managing partner of First Pacific Advisors, is among investors calling for more scrutiny of the board of Occidental Petroleum, the oil and gas exploration and production company based in Los Angeles, Gretchen Morgenson writes in her column for The New York Times. NEW YORK TIMES

Elan Rejects Reduced Bid From Royalty Pharma  | 
REUTERS

Dell Shares Fall Below Buyout Offer Price  |  Dell’s stock fell nearly 4 percent on Friday to close below the $13.65-a-share offer made by the company’s founder, Michael S. Dell, and Silver Lake Partners to take the company private. DealBook »

Anheuser-Busch Reaches Deal With Antitrust Regulators  |  Anheuser-Busch InBev said it had received government approval for its $20.1 billion deal to buy control of Grupo Modelo, the maker of Corona. DealBook »

INVESTMENT BANKING »

With Concerns About Oversight, Banks Leave Certain Regions  |  The Financial Times reports: “Some of the world’s biggest commercial banks are pulling back from selected operations in fast-growing markets in the Middle East and parts of Asia, fearing they may fall foul of tightening rules on anti-money laundering.” FINANCIAL TIMES

Wall Street Tangles With States on Social Media Rules  |  “An unlikely alliance of regulators and industry groups is seeking to carve out exemptions in state laws that would allow certain financial firms to sidestep bans on looking at the personal social-media accounts of employees,” The Wall Street Journal writes. WALL STREET JOURNAL

Mexican Plan Aims to Encourage Lending  | 
REUTERS

Credit Suisse Embraces the Dark Side of Trading  |  Credit Suisse, the operator of the nation’s largest dark pool, has told the major industry data providers that it will no longer provide information on how much trading happens in its pool, CrossFinder. DealBook »

PRIVATE EQUITY »

For Silver Lake, Reducing Dell Bid Would Be Costly  |  It would cost $750 million for Silver Lake and Michael S. Dell to get out of their current deal to buy the computer maker, Bloomberg News notes. On Friday, shares of Dell fell below the $13.65-a-share offer. BLOOMBERG NEWS

Betfair, an Online Gambling Firm, Rejects Offer Led by CVC  | 
REUTERS

HEDGE FUNDS »

Tepper Said to Buy Debt of Energy Future Holdings  |  David Tepper’s Appaloosa Management “has recently accumulated a small position in debt securities of Energy Future Holdings,” the troubled Texas power company, in a bet that “the company will not file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection soon,” The Financial Times writes. FINANCIAL TIMES

Paulson’s Bullish Argument on Gold  |  John A. Paulson’s firm said in a letter to clients, according to Bloomberg News: “Although inflation and inflation expectations remain subdued, which appears to have dampened the appetite for gold so far this year, we believe that ongoing central bank purchases and strong gold demand from China and India will help support the gold price in the near term.” BLOOMBERG NEWS

Hedge Funds Buy More Gold as Prices Fall  | 
BLOOMBERG NEWS

I.P.O./OFFERINGS »

SeaWorld C.E.O. Hints at Overseas Ambitions  |  While the majority of the proceeds from SeaWorld’s successful I.P.O. go to the Blackstone Group, SeaWorld is using its share of the money to reduce its debt, and, in general, to help it achieve its corporate goals. DealBook »

SeaWorld Shares Close Up 24% in Trading Debut  |  The Blackstone Group’s theme-park operator made a splash on Friday in its debut as a publicly traded company. DealBook »

VENTURE CAPITAL »

Eventbrite Attracts $60 Million  |  The ticketing company Eventbrite has raised $60 million from T. Rowe Price and Tiger Global Management, “making it the latest example of a start-up to raise significant private late-stage funding that puts off an initial public offering,” The Wall Street Journal reports. WALL STREET JOURNAL

Tech Boom Drives a Favorite Hangout to Close  |  The Grove restaurant in San Francisco said it was closing its flagship location on Chestnut Street because of untenable rents, “driven up, in large part, because of the well-paid techies who chow down on its huevos rancheros every day,” the Bits blog writes. NEW YORK TIMES BITS

Cyberattacks a Huge Threat to Start-Ups, and Their Investors  |  The hacking of major banks and technology giants garner headlines, but it is the tech-driven start-ups and growth companies that can stand to lose their entire business if they are victims of cyberattacks, write Craig A. Newman and Daniel L. Stein, litigation partners with Richards Kibbe & Orbe. DealBook »

LEGAL/REGULATORY »

Bernanke Said to Be Missing Jackson Hole  |  Ben S. Bernanke, the Federal Reserve chairman, “will miss the annual Jackson Hole monetary policy symposium this year due to a scheduling conflict,” according to Reuters. REUTERS

European Leaders May Be Heeding Call to Spur Growth  |  After the annual meeting of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, high-ranking ministers and officials were “talking up the need to slow the pace of budget cutting and bolster growth on the Continent,” The New York Times writes. NEW YORK TIMES

Morris J. Kramer, Pioneer in Deal Law, Dies at 71  |  Morris J. Kramer, who as a longtime partner at the law firm of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom helped revolutionize the practice of advising on mergers and acquisitions, died on Friday in Manhattan. He was 71.DealBook »

Barclays Employee Named in Libor Case Leaves the Bank  | 
WALL STREET JOURNAL

No Need for 2 Tracks in Money Market Overhaul  |  It is not clear why there needs to be two sets of rules for money market funds that invest in government debt and those that buy corporate debt, Agnes T. Crane writes for Reuters Breakingviews. REUTERS BREAKINGVIEWS