Total Pageviews

Re/code on TV: Twitter’s Latest Shakeup and Facebook Being Facebook

Recode On TV

Twitter was all over the news this week and Re/code journalists were all over TV discussing the breaking stories.

Our co-executive editor Kara Swisher appeared on CNBC to discuss Twitter’s hiring of former Goldman Sachs banker Anthony Noto and the game of musical chairs in the social network’s highest ranks.

I also made an appearance on CNBC to discuss the discovery of "Buy now" buttons integrated into some tweets, signaling the possible launch of Twitter's e-commerce initiative.

Swisher was back on CNBC explaining why Facebook’s secret science test on its users is really par for the course.

On Tuesday, co-executive editor Walt Mossberg was a guest on CNBC to discuss his review of home movie app Animoto.

Lastly, Swisher was back on TV discussing Goldman Sachs' request for Google to permanently delete an email containing sensitive information that was accidentally sent to a stranger's Gmail account.

How Real Will Wearable Games Be?

Leela-wristband Wearables, primarily smartwatches, are in many ways a compelling idea. Yet do the actual wearables we’re seeing offer anything like that? From a gaming standpoint are they really that big of a deal, or are they more a case of high-hopes and maybe-one-days? Read More

Cleantech’s Death Has Been Greatly Exaggerated

12838515965_64937648c1_h After years of largesse where billions of dollars were spent on startup clean technology companies, the venture investors active in the industry seem to be embracing a new model of capital efficiency when it comes to financing. Companies that would have once been the targets of bidding wars and copycat businesses developing similar technologies are finding a more chastened investment climate… Read More

Why Section 702 Reform Matters

Screen Shot 2014-07-06 at 3.49.14 PM A recent report in the Washington Post delved into the National Security Agency’s (NSA) Section 702 surveillance activities, and although it found that the program returns useful information to the agency, it also revealed broad use of the legal authority to collect data and communications from non-target parties. It also indicated that “unmasked identities remain in the… Read More

Charge Your Phone Before Flying! TSA Will Now Block Dead Devices At Some Airports

tsa We’ve all been there: you’re standing in the security line at the airport. The TSA agent is mad at you about a water bottle, or a pair of scissors, or some other thing you forgot was even in your bag. Get rid of it, or you’re not flying. What if that thing keeping you off your flight was your dead iPhone? Read More

Crowdfunding Platform Seedrs Begins Offering ‘Convertible’ Equity Option

Future Ad Labs Proof there’s still room for innovation in the equity crowdfunding space yet, if Seedrs‘ claims of a first hold true. The “pan-European” equity crowdfunding platform is adding ‘convertible’ equity as an option for startups wanting to raise funding via the site, with the UK’s Future Ad Labs being the first to use the new investment mechanism. Read More

Re/wind: Twitter Shopping is Coming, T-Mobile Overbills

Fancy Buy Now Twitter Commerce

Vjeran Pavic

We at Re/code had a wonderful Fourth of July, and are hoping that you did, too. In case you missed any of the big headlines this holiday week, we have you covered with the news that powered Re/code:

  1. Why didn't Twitter buy Soundcloud? Well, one theory is that the cash they didn't spend on the music streaming service just enabled them to purchase Tap Commerce, an adtech firm, in a deal valued at around $100 million. Twitter also brought aboard a new CFO in former Goldman Sachs banker Anthony Noto, who helped guide Twitter through the IPO process. Lastly, it seems soon you’ll be able to shop on Twitter, as “Buy now” buttons started appearing in some tweets earlier this week.
  2. T-Mobile, the "uncarrier" that claims to be the voice of the huddled masses of smartphone users across the nation, found itself in a spot of trouble this week. It turns out a number of T-Mobile subscribers were billed huge data charges for streaming music through Spotify, which is supposed to be free of charge on T-Mobile. Oops.
  3. The arms race for personal health and fitness technologies is heating up, with investments in the field made this year already surpassing the end-year investment total for 2013.
  4. Interested in what cable insiders think about the Aereo shutdown? One anonymous author penned a guest column for Re/code this week, declaring "the Aereo Shutdown Will Be a Disaster for Broadcast TV."
  5. This year could be called "The Year of the Cloud," as more and more companies see their competition aiming to offer more and more products based entirely online. Our latest example of this trend is Founders' Fund's recent investment in an entirely cloud-based robotics lab.
  6. For this week in "The End is Nigh and You Should Begin Stockpiling For the Coming Apocalypse," Arik Hesseldahl reported that the Symantec discovered hackers have been able to infiltrate power grids in the United States and Spain. Maybe you should buy that extra gallon of water for the garage next time you're at the supermarket.
  7. A Pew survey found that Internet experts believe increased commercialization is the greatest threat the Internet faces, as opposed to government surveillance or censorship.
  8. Monetizing college gossip? There's an app for that — YikYak — which just raised $10 million in funding from venture capitalists.
  9. An independent oversight board found that the NSA's Internet spying program is legal, but will require serious changes in order to keep effectively protect Americans' privacy.
  10. Millennials: The man-children of today who will become the leaders of tomorrow! According to a survey from MTV, millennials sure do love them some America, theoretically giving Republicans in Congress less to worry about.

 

Have Sympathy for the Techies, Mimes Say

Mimes in a Boat

San Francisco Mime Troupe

Tech workers are just cogs in the system, and fighting each other only gives corporations more power.

That was the basic message from the San Francisco Mime Troupe, which has been performing non-mimed political theater in the city since 1959. The hour-long show about tech and displacement in the Mission District’s Dolores Park on Friday kicked off its summer schedule. But the tone and approach to the issue was quite different from some of the younger activist groups in the city (who do performance pieces like vomiting on Yahoo buses). In the Mime show, almost every character — the tech worker who invented a surveillance tool, the landlord evicting a small business owner, the beauty parlor owner who displaced an activist — came off as deeply sympathetic.

The audience in Dolores Park

The audience in Dolores Park, photo: Nellie Bowles

Every character, that is, except the tech corporation, Octopus, and its founder.

Our heroine, Jeanine Adenauer, programmed surveillance technology into cell phones, but she did so just to watch over her wandering grandmother, who emerges and walks off stage in a bonnet. When the Octopus founder hires her, he turns her technology into an elaborate surveillance scheme, eventually selling it to the government. Adenauer is horrified.

In all the discussions around the negative impact tech is having on the city, activists have vilified tech and tech workers (a sign at a recent protest was simply “Tech=Death“). The Mime Troupe members said they were bringing it back to an issue of workers rights, freedom, quality of life. They evoked the activism of the 1960′s and the tone of union organizers. Several times, members of the audience raised their fists in solidarity while a character recited — “by any means necessary.”

Ellen Callas, one of the group’s 12 managing collective members, who was on her 28th year, was selling Mime Troupe t-shirts from a booth by the stage.

“Our job in SF is to hold a mirror up to this city — to show what’s going on here. Starting with Vietnam and civil rights and now displacement, but it’s always been about the class struggle and workers rights,” she said. “It’s not like we’re anti-tech, we’re pro-worker. A lot of tech workers are bussed to work, stay and work long long hours, live in micro apartments and never get out, never engage with the community. You know what that is? It’s just another kind of slavery.”

“My Cubicle, My Cubicle” by the San Francisco Mime Troupe: [Sorry. This video cannot be displayed in this feed. View your video here.]

Inside Google’s Big Plan to Race Amazon To Your Door

googleshoppingvamazonfresh

Vjeran Pavic

Google is the undisputed king of search in all but one lucrative and vital category: product searches.

Over the past decade, Amazon has transformed itself from a seller of books online to the place Americans turn to when they want to search and buy just about anything — from diapers to flat screen TVs. In some cities Amazon has started delivering fresh groceries. With each product search that starts on Amazon instead of Google, the search giant’s main business of selling ads alongside search results weakens.

Though Google over the years had experimented with letting consumers buy goods with the help of services such as Google Wallet and Google Checkout, it accelerated this strategy in 2013 with Shopping Express. The service lets shoppers buy things from local retail stores through Google, which then delivers them to consumers from the physical retail store on the same or next day.

A source familiar with the company's plans says senior Google execs have set aside as much as $500 million to expand the service nationwide. Google declined to comment on the size of the investment but made no secret of its ambition.

"You can very much expect that we are putting a lot of money into this and we're excited and willing to sustain that investment over time as this gets going," said Tom Fallows, head of Google Shopping Express.

Investment so far has gone towards the marketing of the service in each new city, the build-up of a fleet of delivery vehicles, as well as towards paying for a network of couriers and workers to pack up the goods in stores and deliver packages to shoppers’ doorsteps.

The service gives Google a crack at the $600 billion grocery market. Also at stake is a large piece of the $3.5 billion in so-called direct-response digital ads that research firm eMarketer expects consumer package goods companies and electronics brands to spend in the U.S. in 2014. This category of ads, which includes search ads, is meant to influence online shoppers to perform specific tasks, such as signing up for email newsletters or making an online purchase.

"Google can't give up on product search and this is another pathway to closing the loop for advertisers," said Keith Anderson, a vice president at the consulting firm RetailNet Group. "They failed on the payments side in stores, but if they can use expedited delivery as a way to get it then they'll keep on being willing to spend."

Google, Ally

Google’s Fallows said a major goal of the initiative is to add more utility to product search advertisements on Google.com. On Amazon, you search for a product and can buy it immediately. On Google, that hasn't been the case.

"We have been displaying to shoppers information about locally available listings for five years," he said. "And throughout that time shoppers had really interesting feedback: 'Thanks, Google, but now you're not helping me do anything about getting that product today.'"

Google is now trying to provide that help. “We think that helping close the loop on locally available items is a really important part of making sure Google is the best place to shop,” Fallows said. Eventually, Google may include some type of notification on product search ads letting shoppers know that a given product is available for same-day delivery, Fallows said.

Unlike Amazon, Google does not operate its own giant warehouses or store inventory for more than a few hours. Instead, it fulfills customer orders by picking up items from nearby retail stores. So rather than compete directly against retailers like Amazon does, Google is attempting to position itself as an ally.

Shoppers in cities where the service is available — mainly areas around San Francisco, Los Angeles and New York City for now — visit a dedicated Google Shopping Express website where they can choose to buy goods like groceries, cameras and clothing from a selection of retail partners.

Partners include big names such as Target, Costco, Toys “R” Us and Whole Foods. Once an order is placed, Google sends a contracted courier to pick up the goods from a partner store, where either a Google employee or a retailer's employee has grabbed the merchandise off of a shelf.

The order is then whisked to a warehouse operated by Google where multiple orders are packed into a vehicle, and sent out the same day. In some instances, Google packs orders and hands them off to shipping partners for delivery the following day.

Google takes a cut of each transaction, usually in the single digit percentages, according to a person familiar with the deals. Fallows called that commission "the core of the business model." Google also charges shoppers a $4.99 fee for each store a courier has to visit to complete an order.

But when the service launched in New York recently, Google waived the delivery fee and said the service would be free for the first six months.

Eventually, Google plans to launch a flat-fee membership model similar to Amazon Prime, Fallows said.


“We are trying to democratize the world of same-day delivery.”

Tom Fallows, head of Google Shopping Express


Amazon Prime costs $99 a year and includes two-day shipping on a wide array of products as well as access to a large library of videos and music that can be streamed via the web for no additional cost. Its Prime Fresh membership, which is only available in parts of California and includes grocery food and other products available for same-day or next-day delivery, costs $299.

Fallows said Google has not decided on a price for the Google Shopping Express subscription, but it wouldn't be surprising if it was under $100 annually.

"We intend this to be an affordable service that as many people as possible can adopt," he said. "We are trying to democratize the world of same-day delivery."

But, under the current model, Google can't do it alone. It needs to strike partnerships with retail companies willing to let Google control the online shopping experience, own the customer data and build relationships with a retailer’s or grocer’s own customers.

For the most part, Google Shopping Express only provides retailers with aggregated customer data on who is buying what from their stores. Retailers and grocers generally only get information on individual purchases if they operate under membership models (such as Costco) or if a customer uses a loyalty card with their Shopping Express purchase. Four retail executives Re/code contacted said they trust Google as a partner and do not have a problem with this arrangement. It's not clear, though, how long retailers will allow Google so much control.

A person familiar with the Shopping Express business told Re/code that certain partners have pushed Google to integrate Shopping Express as a delivery option on their own e-commerce websites. That type of partnership would allow a retailer to feel like it is maintaining a direct relationship with its shoppers while relegating Google to more of a vendor role.

"Our retailers are very interested in how we can extend that service across the full multi-channel engagement that retailers and shoppers have," Fallows said, without directly confirming plans for such an integration. "And across all different destinations."

Proceeding With Caution

In the meantime, retailers who have signed on to work with Google are taking a cautious approach to their partnership. Many are allowing only a handful of their stores to take part in the program as they assess the risks and rewards of the arrangement. Google, after all, is one of the most powerful tech companies on the planet, while retail companies aren't traditionally known for their technology prowess. For some retailers, that gap in technological know-how is all the more reason to partner up with a company like Google. Others fear being taken advantage of by Google.

Big retailers, however, are clearly taking these partnerships seriously. Instead of sending mid-level business development executives to strike deals with Google, some are negotiating at the top. Costco’s CEO, for instance, flew out to Google’s Mountain View, California campus to meet with Google CEO Larry Page before agreeing to participate in the Google Shopping Express program. Costco CFO Richard Galanti also met with execs at Google on a separate trip. Galanti said it’s important for Costco to consider new sales channels as more shoppers make purchases online.


"Why wouldn't Google just eliminate the merchant from the middle?"

Faisal Masud, e-commerce chief at Staples


“We’re pretty good at knowing what we know how to do and what we don’t,” Galanti said. “We’re not arrogant about it.”

What’s keeping some retail bosses awake at night, however, is the ongoing suspicion that Google could eventually build an Amazon-like marketplace in which the search giant sells products directly to shoppers and cuts out brick and mortar retailers altogether. Even some current Google Shopping Express partners see the potential for such an approach.

"Why wouldn't Google just eliminate the merchant from the middle?" said Faisal Masud, e-commerce chief at Staples.

Fallows, for his part, was adamant that Google will not pursue this strategy.

"Very firmly no," he said. "Google is a platform and partnership business. We can't say that strongly enough."

Another fear among some retailers, according to RetailNet Group's Anderson, is that as long as the purchases keep running through Google instead of the retailer's site, Google will start to collect more and more valuable information on who buys what. Google could then use that data to attract more money from brands looking to promote their own product through Shopping Express no matter which retail store it comes from. Some of that marketing money, Anderson believes, could in turn be shifted away from funds these brands typically allocate to retail stores to promote individual products.

"Google may be in a position to go to Procter & Gamble and say, 'Why would you give [marketing] dollars to Target when you can just give them to us and we'll promote the brand whether the shopper decided to buy from Target or another retailer?'" Anderson said.

Despite these concerns, Google has assembled a respectable group of partners to the program. Several of them say participating in the Google Shopping Express program gives them a way to evaluate whether it's more cost-effective to offer same-day and next-day delivery themselves, through a partner or whether they should at all.

Google is not alone in its approach to helping retailers fend off Amazon. eBay's eBay Now service also uses couriers to delivers goods from retail stores to customer doors. The company recently confirmed that it was scaling back its near-term ambitions for the program after originally saying it would expand from three to 25 U.S. cities by the end of 2014. It did not explain why.

Instacart, a fast-growing startup with funding from Andreessen Horowitz and Sequoia Capital, does something similar but focuses on groceries. Instacart hires personal shoppers to go pick up the items from local stores and take them directly to customers’ homes.

Still, the biggest threat to all of these businesses remains Amazon. With sophisticated nationwide logistics infrastructure, and a relentless drive to grab market share, Amazon's same-day and next-day delivery expertise will be hard to rival.

But if you're Google, there’s little choice when part of your core business is at risk.

"Once we're really ready, we can really bring Google's full energy and force to bear to expand this very quickly," Fallows said.