Total Pageviews

Mary Jo White Says Her S.E.C. Would Be Tough on Wall St.

WASHINGTON â€" Mary Jo White moved closer to becoming a top Wall Street regulator on Tuesday as she sailed through a Congressional confirmation hearing. But even her supporters on Capitol Hill pointed to significant challenges awaiting the next leader of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

While she received a friendly reception during two hours of testimony, the Senate Banking Committee grilled Ms. White, the nominee for S.E.C. chairwoman, on her regulatory agenda, demanding that Ms. White complete new rules for Wall Street and take aim at financial fraud. Lawmakers argued that the agency, four years after the financial crisis, must confront a broad array of problems facing the public markets.

Ms. White promised to tackle enforcement actions and unfinished regulation, but offered scant details on her plans. She did, however, signal a flexible approach to reforming money market funds, an approach that could draw scrutiny from investor advocates and liberal lawmakers.

Some lawmakers aso pressed her to outline her strategy for navigating conflicting interests, another potential hindrance for her early days at the S.E.C.

Ms. White, who for decades bounced between roles as a federal prosecutor and a Wall Street defense lawyer, must recuse herself from investigating former clients for at least a year. After defending JPMorgan Chase for its role in the financial crisis, for example, Ms. White could have to sit out an S.E.C. investigation into the bank’s recent $6 billion trading loss.

Senator Sherrod Brown, an Ohio Democrat who has sounded alarms about Ms. White’s turns through the revolving door connecting government and private practice, stressed the possible conflicts on Tuesday. “Nobody questions your integrity but we need some reassurance,” he said. “What have you done over the last decade,” he asked, that would comfort “ordinary investors”

Ms. White explained that her work for Wall Street “does not change me as a person. It doesn’t mean I em! brace the policy thoughts of any of my clients.” Now, she said, “The American public will be my client, and I will work as zealously as is possible on behalf of them.”

Despite fielding some concerns from the Senate Banking Committee, Ms. White easily cleared the latest hurdle to her nomination. Showing no signs of strain, she struck a confident tone and maneuvered around the thorniest questions, prompting both laughter and praise from lawmakers.

The hearing cleared the way for the committee to vote on Ms. White’s nomination as early as next week. Congressional officials expect her to ultimately cruise through the full Senate confirmation. Even one of the committee’s Republicans, Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, declared his intention to vote for Ms. White

Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York, set the tone from the start of the hearing. He praised Ms. White’s “long and distinguished career” as the first female United States attorney in Manhattan and ticked off a litany o awards she won for prosecuting terrorists. Mr. Schumer also noted her playful side: animal enthusiast, motorcyclist, basketball player and lover of cold beer.

“The same toughness she shows playing basketball she will show as S.E.C. chair,” he said, eliciting an uproar of laughter in the hearing room. “She will score many points and not commit too many fouls.”

But Ms. White will encounter significant obstacles at the S.E.C., an agency that finds itself in a critical transition period. When Mary L. Schapiro became the S.E.C.’s leader four years ago, she faced a daunting task. Her primary job was to restore legitimacy to an agency blamed for missing the financial crisis.

With the agency now back from the brink, lawmakers say that Ms. White must elevate the agenda to take on topics outside her predecessor’s regime. Ms. White, for example, vowed to examine the growing world of high-frequency trading, an issue that continues to confound the agency.

As for the dozens of ! unfinishe! d rules under the Dodd-Frank Act, Ms. White called them an “immediate imperative.” But the agency to date has come up short, falling behind on dozens of Wall Street reforms, including the so-called Volcker Rule that reins in risky trading at big banks.

Ms. White will also step into the contentious debate over money market funds, the investments that needed government assistance to survive during the crisis. It’s a sore spot for the agency after internal bickering and industry lobbying halted reform last year. While Ms. White promised that the S.E.C. would tackle the topic again, she indicated that any new rules would not interfere with “the value” of the funds.

Her words alarmed investor advocates, including some of Ms. White’s staunchest supporters, while others noted that it was too soon to read much into her stance. The advocates argue that a regulator’s job is to protect investors, not the funds that cater to them.

“Preserving the money market fund product is not an appopriate public policy goal,” said Dennis Kelleher, the head of Better Markets, an advocacy group that has praised Ms. White’s credentials.

Ms. White, the head of litigation at Debevoise and Plimpton, also faces questions about her role in some S.E.C. enforcement cases.

Citing the “very high bar” she sets for herself when confronting ethical issues, Ms. White explained that she would avoid former clients for a year. In addition to potentially stepping back from the JPMorgan investigation, Ms. White might also temporarily avoid cases involving UBS and other clients.

Lawmakers questioned whether such recusals, even if well intentioned, might cripple her authority.

“How will you signal that wrongdoing will not be tolerated” asked Senator Tim Johnson of South Dakota, the committee’s Democratic chairman.

“I don’t think there’s anything more important than vigorous and credible enforcement of the securities laws,” she replied. “I’ll be very focused on ! that thro! ughout my tenure.”



In Spinoffs, a Chance to Jettison Undesirable Liabilities

A spinoff is a product of Wall Street math that says one plus one can equal three. Yet as shareholders of Time Warner may be about to find out, it can also be all about subtraction, as a company ditches an unwanted businesses, in this case, magazines.

The business argument for a spinoff is typically that a separation of the assets allows both the former parent and the newly independent company to be better run, freeing management to take bolder steps with the new company. And because Wall Street is a place where magic works, the market will recognize this, giving each of the separated companies a higher price.

There is evidence of this effect. Studies of spinoffs have found that they produce short-erm gains, although these gains evaporate over the long term.

Spinoffs, not surprisingly, are big business these days on Wall Street. Last year, there were 85 spinoffs worldwide worth $109 billion, according to Dealogic, down just a bit from 93 spinoffs worth $128 billion in 2011.

But spinoffs have a dark side, as they can serve as a convenient dumping ground. In 1999, General Motors spun off its auto parts maker into Delphi, and the following year, Ford Motor did the same with Visteon. Both automakers larded the subsidiaries with too much debt, high labor costs and sweetheart pricing deals. The result sent both spinoffs into bankruptcy. Ford and G.M. are still dealing with the fallout and l! itigation.

These deals show the temptation lurking in a spinoff: liabilities can be freely attached to the company being spun off. This is often management’s best opportunity to burnish its own company at another’s expense. It’s hard to resist.

Take Tronox, the world’s third-largest maker of pigment titanium dioxide, which was spun off from Kerr-McGee in 2006. It was given all of Kerr-McGee’s environmental liabilities plus $200 million in debt, which it used to pay a pre-spinoff dividend to the parent. The company went bankrupt and is still litigating with Andarko, which later acquired Kerr-McGee, over allegations that the company had been sent off into the world without the resources to survive, let alone thrive.

Another example is Idearc’s spinoff from Verizon. Before being set free, Idearc claims tat it took on $9 billion in debt to pay Verizon, also transferring some $2 billion in cash to Verizon. Idearc, a print and online directory business, soon went bankrupt. Idearc’s bankruptcy trustee later sued Verizon, claiming that the spinoff was a convenient way to get rid of a business Verizon did not know what to do with.

The reason a spinoff is a preferred way to get rid of businesses a company no longer wants is that shareholders have no choice in the matter. The decision is simply made by the board.

The alternative is a sale of the company, but that requires someone to buy it. A spinoff is thus not only an alluring and convenient way to clean up the parent’s balance sheet, it is also a way for managers to show faster earnings improvement by easily discarding a low- or no-growth business.

Another example is Blockbus! ter. Unable to sell the video rental company, its parent, Viacom, spun it off, but before doing so arranged for the company to borrow $1 billion and pay a $905 million special dividend. Unfortunately, Blockbuster was spun off just as the industry began to experience big changes. With a bigger parent company, Blockbuster might have survived; but it was unable to cope and it, too, filed for bankruptcy.

Sometimes, businesses are spun off simply because they make no sense together. As a result, Frankenstein companies, random businesses stitched together, are created and sent out to the public markets without a clear strategy.

The Campbell Soup Company spun off Vlasic Foods International in 1998 n order to focus on its higher margin and growth brands. Vlasic had its well-known pickle business, but also assets that Campbell had tried to sell but failed, including a mushroom grower and Argentine cattle operation.

In addition, $500 million in debt was transferred to the new company. Vlasic Foods announced a reorganization four days after the spinoff and announced three months later that it was likely to default on its debt, eventually declaring bankruptcy.

This brings us to Time Warner. After failed talks that would have created a joint venture magazine company with Meredith, Time Warner was faced with the unpalatable choice of keeping the magazines or spinning them off.

It may seem that there ought to be another way out. What about those private equity firms sitting on hundreds of billio! ns of dol! lars in cash No one wants to take the risk of a troubled business.

Time Warner had to make similar decisions before. In the case of AOL, Time Warner’s goal seemed to be to flee its disastrous combination with the former America Online by spinning off the business rather than trying to ensure AOL’s survival. Still, Time Warner did spin off the business free of debt, and AOL’s stock price has almost doubled since the time of the split.

Having succeeded with the AOL spinoff, Time Warner is trying the same trick. Again, the spinoff is more about Time Warner than the magazine business. The first reason the company gave for the move was that “a complete spinoff of Time Inc. proides strategic clarity for Time Warner Inc., enabling us to focus entirely on our television networks and film and TV production businesses, and improves our growth profile.” In other words, it’s all about me. Not surprisingly, analysts agreed and applauded the move as a good way for Time Warner to improve its growth and therefore stock price.

But the magazine business, with approximately 90 titles, is struggling. Revenue in Time Warner’s publishing division is down about 30 percent from 2007, although it still makes a profit, reported to be $420 million last year. Last year, the publishing division reported a 4.8 percent fall in subscription revenue, with advertising revenue declining by 5.4 percent. True, the business includes popular magazines like Sports Illustrated, People and Time, but the company has not expanded ag! gressivel! y into digital, and many of its international titles like Horse and Hound lack appeal in the United States.

A spokesman for Time Warner said that the details of the spinoff were still being worked out but that an independent Time Inc. would be able to focus on its business objectives, attract new shareholders and have more “flexibility to pursue strategic opportunities that arise.”

Still, the question is whether the Time magazine portfolio spinoff will have the resources to turn itself around. In News Corporation’s spinoff of its publishing assets, it is capitalizing the business with $2.6 billion to ride the storm.

Even if Time Warner is generous, it still leaves the spun-off business without much of a strategy. Perhaps seeing the writing on the wall, the current chief executive of Time Inc., Laura Lang, will not stick around to ru the public company.

In other words, the new Time doesn’t even have a leader to guide it through this difficult transition. Any leadership is going to have to execute a turnaround with limited resources and in the public glare (Dell says it is going private just for this reason).

A spinoff may be a good move for Time Warner and its management, saving them the trouble of having to turn around this business. But the real question is whether it is just a way for Time Warner to take out the trash and leave yet another wounded spinoff to struggle in the market. This may satisfy the Wall Street magicians, but how does it actually create value



Hostess Picks Apollo-Led Group as New Owner of Twinkies

Months after the last Twinkie rolled off the assembly lines at Hostess Brands, the cream-filled icon appears set for a revival.

Hostess said on Tuesday that it had picked a partnership of two investment firms, Apollo Global Management and Metropoulos & Company, as the new owner of its snack cake business, officially concluding the sale of the bankrupt baker’s most prized assets.

Apollo and Metropoulos bid $410 million for the Hostess brands, the company said. It added that it received no other “qualified” bids for the brands, which also include Dolly Madison.

The sale still requires the approval of the federal bankruptcy judge overseeing Hostess’ Chapter 11 case. A hearing has been tentatively scheduled for March 19.

“The agreement results in significant value for our stakeholders and we look forward to putting the proposed transaction before the court next week,” Gregory F. Rayburn, Hostess’ chairman and chief executive, said in a statement.

Hostess was advisedby Perella Weinberg Partners and the law firm Jones Day.



Intrade Sheds Light on How Gray Markets Can Go Dark

Intrade sheds light on how quickly gray markets can go dark. The site, which took bets on everything from elections to oil prices to its own demise, was abruptly shuttered on Sunday. While Intrade’s predictive record was good, it didn’t foresee the rising controversy over under-regulated speculation. It’s a cautionary tale for others operating in a somewhat shadowed zone.

What halted Intrade isn’t clear. The Irish company said it discovered problems, including possible “financial irregularities.” Regulators already had come calling. In November, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission filed a lawsuit that prompted the company to close its site to U.S. punters.

The pseudo-exchange occupied a niche that overlapped with futures dealing, online gambling ad secondary market trading. Eventually, the C.F.T.C. decided that predicting the price of gold, for money, was the same as investing in the future price of a commodity, and that Intrade therefore wasn’t stopping ineligible U.S. customers from making wagers.

Other similar sorts of markets have met a similar fate. In 2006, U.S. lawmakers cracked down on overseas gambling sites by prohibiting banks and credit card companies from processing related payments. It eradicated big slugs of market value for British companies PartyGaming and 888.com.

Others, like fantasy sports site StarStreet, are still flourishing. The company says its operations are legal because games where competitors create fictional teams using real-life professional athletes are based on skill and therefore exempt from the same 2006 law.

Exchanges like SecondMarket, which allow trading in the equity of private firms including Facebook before its initial public offering, have been gradually becoming more accepted. The new JOBS Act simplifies compliance and expands the number of eligible companies. Last week’s announcement by Nasdaq that it was forming a joint venture with SharesPost underscores their continuing emergence.

Yet markets in unlisted companies, even big ones like Twitter, provide less disclosure and are far more illiquid than public ones. The collapse of Germany’s small-cap Neuer Markt after the dot-com bubble and the shrinkage of London’s AIM since 2007 are cases in point. Even Goldman Sachs couldn’t attract enough investors to sustain ts GSTrUE marketplace. If regulators don’t catch up with gray-zone operators, other forces often do.

Robert Cyran is a columnist for Reuters Breakingviews. For more independent commentary and analysis, visit breakingviews.com.



Greenberg Forges Ahead With Lawsuit Over A.I.G. Bailout

The American International Group‘s former chief executive is moving ahead with a lawsuit against the federal government over its $182 billion rescue of the insurer â€" even without the backing of the company itself.

A.I.G.’s former leader, Maurice R. Greenberg, filed an amended complaint against the government on Tuesday, largely restating his arguments that 2008 bailout of the insurer was unconstitutional and wrongly cheated shareholders out of billions of dollars.

His case received a boost on Monday, when the federal judge overseeing the case granted the lawsuit class-action status.

A.I.G. itself declined to join the lawsuit in January, after the insurer faced an enormous public uproar over the prospect of suing the source of its lifeline. Lawmakers and others had strongly criticized the company after The New York Times reported on the deliberations, with some legislators deeming it “the poster company for corporate ingratitude and chutzpah.”

The insurer’s chief executive, Robert H. Benmosche, has long promoted the fact that his company paid back the government in full â€" and with an additional $22.7 billion profit. (Coincidentally, Mr. Greenberg contends that the profit rightfully belongs to shareholders at the time of the bailout.)

By forgoing the lawsuit, A.I.G. risks missing out on billions of ! dollars that Mr. Greenberg and his fellow plaintiffs would garner if they win. That might also invite a multitude of lawsuits against the insurer.

In the amended complaint, lawyers for Mr. Greenberg argued that A.I.G. was under pressure from its onetime largest shareholder, the federal government, not to join the legal fight.

“The United States indicated it would wage a negative public relations campaign against A.I.G. and its directors, terminate any cooperative relationship with AIG, and heavily scrutinize A.I.G.’s S.E.C., tax, and other filings from the 2008 to 2010 period when defendant controlled A.I.G.,” lawyers for Mr. Greenberg wrote.

A.I.G. said in a statement that its board’s decision in January hasn’t changed.

“A.I.G. will neither pursue these claims itself nor permit Starr to pursue them in A.I.G.’s name,” the company said. “A.I.G. will move to dismiss the derivative claims asserted by Starr in A.I.G.’s name, consistent with the A.I.G. board of directos’ previous decision. ”

A spokeswoman for the Treasury Department didn’t have an immediate comment.



One Possible Hitch to an Autonomy Investigation

Presumably the antitrust investigators who looked at Microsoft back in the day had Windows software on their own computers. One could imagine that the prosecutors who brought accounting fraud cases against WorldCom executives might have used its MCI long-distance service. And any number of regulators around the world likely Google for personal and professional reasons.

Yet the use of a product that is used by a number of government agencies may hold up an investigation in Britain into the $10 billion acquisition of Autonomy in 2011 by Hewlett-Packard.

The computer maker disclosed on Monday that it had been informed that the Serious Fraud Office of Britain had opened a criminal investigation relating to Autonomy.

Hewlett has accused Autonomy of inflating sales and committing accounting chicanery before the sale. Hewlett took a charge of more than $5 billion in the November for what it said weredisclosure abuses. Autonomy’s founder and former chief executive, Mike Lynch, has denied the allegations.

Yet on Tuesday, the Serious Fraud Office cautioned that as a first step it needed to make sure that its use of an Autonomy product, Introspect, as a document management tool, did not pose a conflict of interest.

The British agency said in a statement:

The S.F.O. is keen to ensure that there is now no conflict of interest, or perception of such a conflict and it is obliged as a first step to make inquiries to ensure that it can continue as the investigating body. It is undertaking this work at present.

And what is Introspect A 2010 press release describes it as:

the world’s leading processing, review and production platform. Introspect is able to process petabytes of! ESI [electronically stored information], including more than 100 languages and 1,000 file types, and intelligently filters and culls the data to quickly reduce volume and gain visibility to the information contained within massive data sets. The Introspect processing services team carefully manages the critical processes of batch tagging and exporting the resulting set of documents, de-duplicating and extracting the metadata and preparing documents in a litigation-ready format.

If the Serious Fraud Office decides to proceed with its investigation, it will at least find itself on a level playing field. Clifford Chance, the law firm that is advising Mr. Lynch in his fight with Hewlett, also uses Autonomy products, as does the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Justice Department.



One Possible Hitch to an Autonomy Investigation

Presumably the antitrust investigators who looked at Microsoft back in the day had Windows software on their own computers. One could imagine that the prosecutors who brought accounting fraud cases against WorldCom executives might have used its MCI long-distance service. And any number of regulators around the world likely Google for personal and professional reasons.

Yet the use of a product that is used by a number of government agencies may hold up an investigation in Britain into the $10 billion acquisition of Autonomy in 2011 by Hewlett-Packard.

The computer maker disclosed on Monday that it had been informed that the Serious Fraud Office of Britain had opened a criminal investigation relating to Autonomy.

Hewlett has accused Autonomy of inflating sales and committing accounting chicanery before the sale. Hewlett took a charge of more than $5 billion in the November for what it said weredisclosure abuses. Autonomy’s founder and former chief executive, Mike Lynch, has denied the allegations.

Yet on Tuesday, the Serious Fraud Office cautioned that as a first step it needed to make sure that its use of an Autonomy product, Introspect, as a document management tool, did not pose a conflict of interest.

The British agency said in a statement:

The S.F.O. is keen to ensure that there is now no conflict of interest, or perception of such a conflict and it is obliged as a first step to make inquiries to ensure that it can continue as the investigating body. It is undertaking this work at present.

And what is Introspect A 2010 press release describes it as:

the world’s leading processing, review and production platform. Introspect is able to process petabytes of! ESI [electronically stored information], including more than 100 languages and 1,000 file types, and intelligently filters and culls the data to quickly reduce volume and gain visibility to the information contained within massive data sets. The Introspect processing services team carefully manages the critical processes of batch tagging and exporting the resulting set of documents, de-duplicating and extracting the metadata and preparing documents in a litigation-ready format.

If the Serious Fraud Office decides to proceed with its investigation, it will at least find itself on a level playing field. Clifford Chance, the law firm that is advising Mr. Lynch in his fight with Hewlett, also uses Autonomy products, as does the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Justice Department.



MetroPCS Urges Shareholders to Approve Merger With T-Mobile

MetroPCS urged shareholders on Tuesday to approve the cellphone service provider’s merger with T-Mobile USA, in the face of rising opposition from two major hedge funds.

MetroPCS’s chief executive, Roger D. Linquist, argued in a letter that the complex merger, which will give existing investors a 26 percent stake in the combined company, was the best possible option for shareholders. Mr. Linquist added that the company had considered various alternatives, but concluded that it would best grow by becoming the top low-cost cellphone service company in the country.

“If stockholders do not approve the proposals related to the proposed combination, there is no assurance MetroPCS will be able to deliver the same or better stockholder value in the future,” he wrote.

The letter on Tuesday came as two of the company’s biggestinvestors, Paulson & Company and P. Schoenfeld Asset Management, claimed that the deal would leave the combined company with too much debt. The two hedge funds also protested the split of the combined company’s shares, arguing that MetroPCS shareholders should own more.

Together, the two firms hold more than 10 percent of MetroPCS.

In his letter, Mr. Linquist argued that the debt the combined company was taking on was in line with industry peers, and the interest rates would be comparable to what others were paying in the market.

A vote on the merger is scheduled for April 12.



MetroPCS Urges Shareholders to Approve Merger With T-Mobile

MetroPCS urged shareholders on Tuesday to approve the cellphone service provider’s merger with T-Mobile USA, in the face of rising opposition from two major hedge funds.

MetroPCS’s chief executive, Roger D. Linquist, argued in a letter that the complex merger, which will give existing investors a 26 percent stake in the combined company, was the best possible option for shareholders. Mr. Linquist added that the company had considered various alternatives, but concluded that it would best grow by becoming the top low-cost cellphone service company in the country.

“If stockholders do not approve the proposals related to the proposed combination, there is no assurance MetroPCS will be able to deliver the same or better stockholder value in the future,” he wrote.

The letter on Tuesday came as two of the company’s biggestinvestors, Paulson & Company and P. Schoenfeld Asset Management, claimed that the deal would leave the combined company with too much debt. The two hedge funds also protested the split of the combined company’s shares, arguing that MetroPCS shareholders should own more.

Together, the two firms hold more than 10 percent of MetroPCS.

In his letter, Mr. Linquist argued that the debt the combined company was taking on was in line with industry peers, and the interest rates would be comparable to what others were paying in the market.

A vote on the merger is scheduled for April 12.



Live Blog: Hearing for S.E.C. Nominee

Mary Jo White is poised to become a top Wall Street regulator. But as President Obama’s pick to lead the Securities and Exchange Commission, she must first clear a crucial hurdle: her Senate confirmation hearing, which starts at 10 a.m.

While Ms. White is expected to cruise to confirmation this month, she must address questions from members of the Senate Banking Committee who have lingering concerns about her ties to Wall Street and lack of regulatory experience. Liberal lawmakers, pointing to a roster of clients including JPMorgan Chase and Morgan Stanley’s board, will likely question her ability to regulate the same banks she recently defended. As the head of litigation at Debevoise & Plimpton, she also defended UBS and Michael Geoghegan, a former head of HSBC.

But today Ms. White is expected to highlight her long tenure as a federal prosecutor in New York and outline her vision for running the S.E.C.

“If confirmed, it will be a high priority throughout my tenure to further stregthen the enforcement function of the S.E.C. â€" it must be fair, but it also must be bold and unrelenting,” she said in prepared testimony released on Monday.

Ms. White will have company at the witness table. Richard Cordray, the nominee to become director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, also faces a confirmation hearing today. Last year, the Senate declined to confirm Mr. Cordray in the face of Republican concerns about the new agency, prompting Mr. Obama to make a recess appointment.



Watch Out for the Lamp!

Billionaire George Soros is finally fighting back in the legal wrangle with his former mistress Adriana Ferreyr â€" countersuing her for defamation and assault, and alleging she threw a glass lamp at him during an argument in bed.

Soros’ lawyers last night filed their response to the Brazilian bombshell’s $50 million suit in 2011, which claimed he promised her a $2 million apartment at 30 E. 85th St. but instead gave it to her love rival, his now-fiancée Tamiko Bolton.

Soros’ papers state: “Soros and Ferreyr . . . engaged in a physically intimate relationship over the course of several years. [They] continued to date other people. [At the time of the alleged assault in 2010] Soros was approximately 80 years old, and Ferreyr was approx. 27 years old.”

REUTERS

George Soros

Soros’ suit claims the fight started “while lying in bed” when “Ferreyr asked Soros about the status of the apartment . . . Soros informed her that another woman with whom he had a relationship was living in Apt. 7C, and that the other woman was very happy living there.”

“Ferreyr became enraged, picked up a nearby lamp that was made partly of glass, and knowingly, intentionally, and wilfully attempted to strike Soros with it,” his suit claims. “The lamp struck Soros’ forearm, then fell to the floor and broke . . . Soros did not hit Ferreyr . . . Ferreyr stood up and cut her foot on one or more of the shards of glass.”

Police were called and, according to the court papers, “Ferreyr made false statements to the police . . . [by claiming] ‘Soros with an open hand smacked her on the right side of face.’ ”

Soros’ assault and battery suit claims she struck him “with the lamp in an effort to harm him.” He’s also suing for defamation, claiming her statement tht he “hit her in the face” was false.

Soros’ lawyer William Zabel said, “This is the first time that we have had an opportunity to respond formally to Ms. Ferreyr’s false claims and to make our own counterclaims to hold her accountable for the harm her malicious assertions have caused Mr. Soros.” Ferreyr’s lawyer William Beslow declined to comment.



To Indict, or Not to Indict

Some banks may have become too big to prosecute, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. said last week in testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee. That comment â€" an acknowledgment, for the first time, that Mr. Holder has not pursued big bank prosecutions out of fear of possibly harming the financial system â€" raises a variety of questions, Andrew Ross Sorkin writes in the DealBook column. “Does this mean that our banks are still too big to fail Should we prosecute corporations Should the size of an institution or its systemic importance influence the decision of prosecutors What’s the right policy”

“At a minimum, Mr. Holder’s comments are embarrassingly at odds with the Obama administration’s view that too-big-to-fail was fixed by the Dodd-Frank financial regulation law.” But the remarks also point to a deeper question f whether indicting corporations is effective. “The fact that prosecutors have not claimed a big-time scalp in the financial crisis obscures the issue of prosecuting companies themselves and the complications such prosecutions raise.”

The case of the accounting firm Arthur Andersen provides a lesson. “The charges against the firm put it out of business, and 28,000 employees â€" most of whom had nothing to do with the Enron case or the shredding of documents â€" lost their jobs. Making matters worse, the conviction of Arthur Andersen was overruled on appeal by the Supreme Court. Prosecutors decided not to pursue the case. Ever since then, the Justice Department has been much more cognizant of the collateral damage of bringing a criminal case against a company â€" as opposed to prosecuting the individual employees responsible for the crime.”

NOMINEE FOR S.E.C. CHIEF SET TO WOO CRITICS  | ! Mary Jo White, President Obama’s pick to lead the Securities and Exchange Commission, is going before the Senate Banking Committee in a hearing starting at 10 a.m., with plans to deflect concerns about her ability to regulate the banks she recently defended. In written testimony released on Monday, Ms. White outlined her experience going after white-collar crime as a federal prosecutor in New York, pledging to continue rooting out financial fraud as head of the S.E.C., DealBook’s Ben Protess reports. “If confirmed, it will be a high priority throughout my tenure tofurther strengthen the enforcement function of the S.E.C. â€" it must be fair, but it also must be bold and unrelenting,” Ms. White said in the testimony. “Strong enforcement is necessary for investor confidence and is essential to the integrity of our financial markets.”

Ms. White’s testimony “provided the first window into her priorities as an S.E.C. chief,” Mr. Protess says. “She placed a premium on unearthing financial fraud, while also spelling out an agenda that included keeping a closer eye on high-speed trading firms and putting the finishing touches on new rules for Wall Street.” Also at the hearing will be Richard Cordray, who was reappointed as head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. DealBook will be live-blogging the confirmation hearing.

ICAHN GOES MUM; DELL FOUNDER SPEAKS OUT  |  Carl C. ! Icahn, wh! o last week seemed poised to join the shareholder opposition to the proposed $24.4 billion buyout of Dell, has agreed to review the computer maker’s confidential data. The move keeps the activist investor silent, for now, as he examines Dell’s books as a participant in the “go shop” process being run by Dell’s board, DealBook’s Michael J. de la Merced reports. In a statement on Monday, Mr. Icahn’s firm said it “looks forward to commencing its review of Dell’s confidential information.”

Meanwhile, the bidding group â€" Michael S. Dell and the investment firm Silver Lake â€" has hired Citigroup to provide advice, according to The Wall Street Journal, which cites unidentified people familiar with the matter. The move would prevent another possible bidder from using Citigroup€™s services. With Citigroup in the bidder’s camp, most of the big Wall Street banks would now be working on the deal in some capacity.

Mr. Dell gave a rare interview about the deal. He told the radio program Marketplace that the proposed transaction “means the company will be even more founder-led than it was in its first few decades. I think this is very good for our customers. It gives our shareholders an opportunity to take advantage of some of the benefits of the things that we are doing as a company without taking on all the risks that I and Silver Lake will bear.”

ON THE AGENDA  |  Costco Wholesale reports earnings before the market opens, and Dole Food reports earnings on Tuesday evening. Mohamed El-Erian, chief exec! utive of ! Pimco, is on CNBC at 8:30 a.m. Robert Iger, chief executive of the Walt Disney Company, is on CNBC at 3:10 p.m.

S.E.C. ACCUSES ILLINOIS OF FRAUD  |  “For the second time in history, federal regulators have accused an American state of securities fraud, finding that Illinois misled investors about the condition of its public pension system from 2005 to 2009,” Mary Williams Walsh reports in The New York Times. “In announcing a settlement with the state on Monday, the Securities and Exchange Commission accused Illinois of claiming that it had been properly funding public workers’ retirement plans when it had not. In particular, it cited the period from 2005 to 2009, when Illinois also issued $2.2 billion in bonds.” Still, “the S.E.C. did not measure any loss in dollars, and it id not impose fines or penalties in Monday’s settlement.”

Mergers & Acquisitions »

Hostess Announces Buyers for Snack Business  |  Apollo Global Management and C. Dean Metropoulos & Company are buying the snack cake business of Hostess Brands, including Twinkies, Reuters reports. No other bids were received, Hostess said. REUTERS

British Authorities Open Inquiry Into Autonomy Deal  |  The Associated Press reports: “British authorities have opened an investigation into Hewlett-Packard’s claims that it was duped wh! en it bou! ght the business software maker Autonomy, according to regulatory documents filed Monday.” ASSOCIATED PRESS

Salesforce Prepares to Go Shopping  |  Salesforce.com said it would offer $1 billion of convertible notes to help pay for activities including possible acquisitions. NEWS RELEASE

Zynga Gets a Lift From Deal Speculation  |  Zynga’s shares rose on Monday after an analyst predicted that Yahoo might consider buying the company, Bloomberg News reports. BLOOMBERG NEWS

BlackBerry Shares Rise on Takeover Speculation  |  Shares of BlackBerry rose on Monday after the chief executive of the Lenovo Group told a French newspaper that an acquisition of BlackBerry might be considered in the future, according to Reuters. REUTERS

LinkedIn Said to Agree to Buy News Reading App  |  LinkedIn is buying the maker of Pulse, an app for reading content on mobile devices, for “between $50 million and $100 million,” AllThingsD reports, citing unidentified people familiar with the negotiations. ALLTHINGSD

INVESTMENT BANKING »

Barclays Proposes Overhaul of Benchmark Rates  |  Barclays said in a letter in response to the International Organization of Securities Commissions that benchmarks like the London interbank offered rates, or Libor, should be tied to actual transactions rather than estimates, Bloomberg News reports. BLOOMBERG NEWS

Former Citigroup Trader Reshapes a Town in Vermont  |  Andrew J. Hall, who turned heads after earning a $100 million pay pacage at Citigroup, has purchased more than 2,400 acres in Reading, Vt., “has torn down at least half a dozen homes” and “opened an appointment-only art museum there,” Bloomberg News reports. BLOOMBERG NEWS

Lloyds Bank Sells Stake in Wealth Manager  |  The Lloyds Banking Group made about $596 million on a sale of part of its stake in St. James’s Place, a wealth management firm, Bloomberg News reports. BLOOMBERG NEWS

The Billion-Dollar Banker  |  André Esteves, chief executive of the investment bank BTG Pactual, has! forged a! formidable reputation for value enhancement. But there are limits, Christopher Swann and Jeffrey Goldfarb of Reuters Breakingviews write. REUTERS BREAKINGVIEWS

A Barclays Banker Bets on a ‘Fat Cat’  |  This week, Rich Ricci, the head of the investment banking unit of Barclays, is entering several horses in the Cheltenham Festival, including “Fat Cat in the Hat.” DealBook »

PRIVATE EQUITY »

Owner of Yankee Candle Said to Pursue a Sale  |  Yankee Candle, the candle makerthat was acquired by Madison Dearborn Partners in 2006, is working with Barclays and Bank of America “on a sale process that is still in the early stages,” Reuters reports, citing three unidentified people familiar with the matter. REUTERS

Carlyle and K.K.R. Said to Be Bidding for Thai Life Insurance Stake  | 
REUTERS

In Africa, Private Equity Investors See Opportunity  | 
FINANCIAL TIMES

HEDGE FUNDS »

Hedge Fund Donates $30 Million to Imperial College  |  Brevan Howard, the secretive London-based hedge fund, agreed on Monday to donate $30 million to Imperial College to set up a finance research center in its name. DealBook »

A Bright Spot for the Man Group  |  Financial Risk Management, a unit of the beleaguered hedge fund firm Man Group, “may see the best return from its multistrategy funds of funds since 2009, said its chief investment officer,” according to Bloomberg News. BLOOMBERG NEWS

I.P.O./OFFERINGS »

Constellium, Backed by Apollo, Said to Prepare for I.P.O.  |  Constellium, a maker of aluminum products for aerospace and transportation based in Paris, “is starting to interview banks for an initial public offering,” according to Reuters, which cites two unidentified people familiar with the situation. The company is majority owned by Apollo Global Management. REUTERS

! U.S. Sold! $489.9 Million of General Motors Stock in February  | 
DETROIT FREE PRESS

VENTURE CAPITAL »

Enterprise Data Start-Up Raises $60 Million  |  Domo, which offers a cloud-based service in the “business intelligence” category, raised a $60 million financing round from investors including GGV Capital and Greylock Partners, AllThingsD reports. ALLTHINGSD

LEGAL/REGULATORY »

Responding to Financial Crisis, Britain Overhauls Its Regulators  |  Britain, unlike other economic powers, is responding to the financial crisis by creating two new agencies, one to oversee institutions and another to watch for market abuses. DealBook »

Oppenheimer Settles S.E.C.’s Accusations It Misled Investors  |  The S.E.C. said that Oppenheimer had inflated the value of the largest investment in its fund. The false valuation raised the fund’s internal rate of return. DealBook »

!

Former Massachusetts Senator to Join Nixon Peabody  |  Scott Brown, the former Massachusetts senator who lost his seat to Elizabeth Warren last year, will work at Nixon Peabody’s Boston headquarters and focus on the financial services industry and commercial real estate matters. DealBook »

Schapiro Is Nominated to G.E. Board  |  General Electric announced on Monday that it had nominated Mary L. Schapiro to serve as one of its directors. She will stand for election at the company’s annual meeting on April 24. DealBook »

Mexcan Leaders Propose Overhaul of Telecom Rules  |  The New York Times reports: “President Enrique Peña Nieto and leaders of Mexico’s three main political parties on Monday presented a sweeping overhaul of the laws regulating telecommunications, the most serious effort yet to rein in the country’s dominant telephone and television companies.” NEW YORK TIMES

Prosecutors Push for Jail Time for Tipster in Insider Trading Case  | 
BLOOMBERG NEWS

Amid Austerity in Italy, Businesses on the Brink  | 
NEW YORK TIMES

The Implications of the Swiss Vote on Pay  | 
QUARTZ