Total Pageviews

JPMorgan Hiring Put China’s Elite on an Easy Track

The program was originally called “Sons and Daughters.” And although it was supposed to protect JPMorgan Chase’s business dealings in China, the program went so off track that it is now the focus of a federal bribery investigation in the United States, interviews and a confidential government document show.

JPMorgan started the program in 2006 as the friends and family of China’s ruling elite were clamoring for jobs at the bank, according to the interviews with former bank employees and financial executives in China and the United States. The program’s existence, which has not been previously reported, suggests that the bank’s hiring of such employees was widespread.

Saying they wanted to weed out nepotism and avoid bribery charges in the United States, JPMorgan employees in Asia started the program to hire well-connected candidates on a separate track from ordinary applicants, the employees and executives said. Without the program and its heightened scrutiny of the candidates, the employees argued, JPMorgan might improperly hire the children of Chinese officials to win business.

But in the months and years that followed, the two-tiered process that could have prevented questionable hiring practices instead fostered them, according to the interviews as well as the confidential government document. Applicants from prominent Chinese families, interviews show, often faced few job interviews and relaxed standards. While many candidates met or exceeded the bank’s requirements, some had subpar academic records and lacked relevant expertise.

JPMorgan, which declined to comment, has not been accused of any wrongdoing. And no one has indicated that the children of Chinese officials helped the bank secure business deals. Furthermore, public documents do not offer a concrete link between the bank’s hiring practices and its ability to secure business deals.

Yet, according to the interviews, which were conducted on the condition of anonymity, JPMorgan employees in Asia recognized the benefit of hiring Chinese officials’ children. In an internal document, the employees linked the hires to the “revenue” JPMorgan obtained from companies run by those same officials.

It is unclear why and when the “Sons and Daughters” program shifted from a safeguard into a liability. But the results were clear: Children with elite pedigrees faced lower standards. In one instance, according to the interviews, the bank continued to employ the son of Tang Shuangning, the chairman of a state-controlled financial conglomerate, even though some JPMorgan officials questioned the younger Mr. Tang’s financial expertise.

The son, whose résumé included impressive stints at other global banks, is one of two former JPMorgan employees to surface in an antibribery investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission, according to the confidential agency document sent to the bank and reviewed by The New York Times. The S.E.C. document â€" a May 2013 letter to JPMorgan that outlined the scope of the agency’s inquiry â€" sought “documents sufficient to identify all persons involved in the decision to hire” the employees.

The S.E.C. did not inquire about the daughter of Ning Gaoning, the chairman of China’s giant state run food company, Cofco. However, according to a review of securities filings and public records, she was an intern at JPMorgan during the summer of 2012. JPMorgan won business from Cofco, or a subsidiary, before she joined the bank. Yet after she arrived, a subsidiary of Cofco also hired JPMorgan to advise on its plan to raise about $580 million through an issuance of shares, a deal that could draw interest from the S.E.C.

The S.E.C. is coordinating its civil investigation with federal prosecutors and the F.B.I., officials said on Thursday, though the criminal authorities have not yet contacted the bank. Hong Kong authorities are also investigating the hiring practices, according to people briefed on the matter.

According to the interviews, an internal JPMorgan investigation into its hiring practices across the globe has so far identified more than 250 well-connected hires in Asia alone. That number included the sons and daughters of private Chinese companies, a hiring practice that would not violate United States law but could cause regulatory problems overseas.

At the heart of the S.E.C.’s investigation is the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, which essentially bans United States companies from giving “anything of value” to a foreign official to win “an improper advantage” in retaining business.

According to legal experts, there is nothing inherently improper about hiring well-connected people. To run afoul of the law, a company must act with “corrupt” intent, or with the expectation of offering a job in exchange for government business.

It is unclear whether the S.E.C. will find such a link in JPMorgan’s case. Still, according to securities filings and the confidential S.E.C. document, some of the bank’s hiring came at an opportune time.

One striking example was the hiring of Tang Xiaoning, whose father is the chairman of the China Everbright Group, the state-controlled financial conglomerate.

Before the hiring in 2010, the bank’s business with China Everbright was limited, if not nonexistent, based on a review of securities filings and news reports. Since then, though, JPMorgan won a steady flow of business. In 2011, China Everbright’s banking subsidiary picked JPMorgan as one of 12 financial advisers on its decision to become a public company, a common move in China for businesses affiliated with the government. While that deal was delayed amid global economic turmoil and questions about China’s banking system, JPMorgan has since secured other coveted business from China Everbright.

In 2012, for example, JPMorgan was the sole bank hired to advise China Everbright International, a subsidiary focused on alternative energy businesses, on a $162 million sale of shares, according to Standard & Poor’s Capital IQ, a research service. JPMorgan also advised the China Everbright Group on its role in what was, according to the research firm Dealogic, the largest-ever private equity deal in China.

With those relationships in mind, the S.E.C. asked the bank for “all documents” relating to the younger Mr. Tang’s “recruitment, hiring” and application.

The S.E.C. is also examining the hiring of Zhang Xixi, whose father is Zhang Shuguang, the former deputy chief engineer of China’s railway ministry. She joined JPMorgan around 2007. In the months and years to come, the bank nestled closer to the railways business in China.

The government agency has never hired JPMorgan directly, securities filings and news reports suggest. Still those records indicate that the China Railway Group, the construction company whose largest customer is thought to be the Chinese government, picked JPMorgan to advise it on plans to become a public company in 2007.

JPMorgan scored desired business about four years later when Ms. Zhang was an associate at the bank. The operator of a high-speed railway from Beijing to Shanghai picked the bank to guide it through its own initial public stock offering, according to news reports. In the S.E.C. document, the agency requested that JPMorgan turn over documents related to the public offering.

Ms. Zhang’s father, the document noted, was detained on suspicion of corruption. To date, he has not been prosecuted.

David Barboza contributed reporting.



Apache to Sell Stake in Egyptian Holdings to Sinopec for $3.1 Billion

The Apache Corporation agreed on Thursday to sell a third of its Egyptian oil and gas business to Sinopec, the big Chinese petroleum company, for $3.1 billion in cash as part of a continued effort to sell off assets and rebalance its portfolio.

Last month, the American oil company announced a deal to sell its businesses in the Gulf of Mexico’s shelf to a portfolio company of Riverstone Holdings for $3.75 billion.

The sales followed a steady string of acquisitions by Apache over the last three years that cost more than $15 billion. The company has been looking to refocus on North American on-shore holdings, which it believes are more predictable and consistent in growth.

While Apache considers its Egyptian unit a strong performer, it has faced questions about the longer-term prospects of the business, given the recent instability in the country.

Apache and Sinopec reached the deal on Thursday after several months of talks. Apache, which has operated in Egypt for 20 years, will still run the business, which produced a daily average of 100 million barrels of oil and 354 million cubic feet of natural gas last year.

Sinopec, formally known as the China Petroleum and Chemical Company, has been one of the more aggressive Chinese oil companies in seeking new holdings abroad to help sate its country’s hunger for fuel.

“We are pleased to launch a global partnership with Sinopec, and to welcome them into our business in Egypt,” G. Steven Farris, Apache’s chairman and chief executive, said in a statement. He added, “Sinopec is an ideal partner for us, and we look forward to the growth and value generation ahead for both companies through the expansion of our collaboration to other projects.”

The deal is expected to close by the year’s end, with the new partnership beginning on Jan. 1.



Harbinger to Take an Insurance Business Public

Harbinger Capital Partners filed to take one of its insurance businesses public on Thursday, just more than a week after the hedge fund agreed to a tougher compromise with the Securities and Exchange Commission over accusations of market manipulation.

The Harbinger unit, Fidelity and Guaranty Life, disclosed in a prospectus that it is seeking to raise $100 million in its initial public offering, a preliminary figure meant to calculate registration fees. No other details, including a potential selling price per share, were disclosed.

The firm, based in Baltimore, sells fixed annuities and life insurance products.

The insurer has posted steady growth over the last two years: It reported $344.1 million in net income last year, nearly double what it earned in 2011, atop $1.2 billion in revenue. For the nine months ended June 30, Fidelity and Guaranty reported $237 million in profit, more than twice what it reported in the period a year earlier.

According to the prospectus, Fidelity and Guaranty will use some of the proceeds from its offering to pay a dividend to Harbinger, as well as to finance corporate growth. The hedge fund is not expected to sell any of its shares.

Credit Suisse will lead the offering.

The unit’s controlling shareholders are affiliates of the hedge fund owned by the investor Philip A. Falcone. On Aug. 19, Mr. Falcone agreed to a landmark settlement with the S.E.C.

As part of the $18 million settlement, Mr. Falcone agreed to admit wrongdoing related to market manipulation accusations. In addition to paying the fine, Mr. Falcone agreed to be barred from the securities industry for up to five years.

While Mr. Falcone is not allowed to raise any new capital for his own hedge fund, he will be able to continue to act as an officer of a public company.

Harbinger has faced regulatory scrutiny in the insurance business as well. It, along with other investment firms like Apollo Global Management and Guggenheim Partners, have received requests for information from Benjamin Lawsky, New York State’s superintendent of financial services. Mr. Lawsky has professed concern about Wall Street firms owning life insurers and whether they are looking out for the long-term interests of policyholders.



Foundation Tied to KPN Seeks to Block America Movil’s Takeover Bid

AMSTERDAM/MEXICO CITY | Thu Aug 29, 2013 7:06pm EDT

(Reuters) - An independent foundation linked to KPN (KPN.AS) said on Thursday it had moved to block America Movil's (AMXL.MX) proposed 7.2 billion-euro offer for the Dutch telecoms group to protect the interests of stakeholders.

The move could test billionaire Carlos Slim's resolve to acquire European assets to offset a slowdown in core profit at his flagship company America Movil, a person familiar with the sector said.

The KPN foundation - set up to protect key national infrastructure when the former state-owned monopoly was being privatized - said it had exercised an option to buy certain shares that will give it almost 50 percent of KPN's voting stock.

"The foundation has intervened in this way in order to safeguard the interests of KPN and its stakeholders, including shareholders, employees, customers, trade unions and Dutch society more generally," it said, adding that these interests were at risk because America Movil had not consulted with KPN before announcing its intention to make a takeover offer.

America Movil, which holds close to 30 percent of KPN and earlier this monthsaid it intended to bid for the rest of the company, could challenge the move in court.

"We wouldn't be surprised to see AMX go to (the European Union) to challenge the authority and legality of the foundation on the back of this move," said Imari Love, analyst at Morningstar. "It's clear the foundation is trying to keep KPN Dutch-owned by using this poison pill, which, in effect, has the same impact of golden shares, which are illegal."

It is also possible that America Movil could negotiate and offer a higher price for the 70 percent of KPN it does not already own.

"The foundation believes that America Movil should, in accordance with the rules and what is common practice in the Netherlands, open negotiations with KPN's Board of Management and the Dutch government as soon as possible," the foundation said in its statement.

TACTICS

America Movil made its offer for the rest of KPN to squeeze more money from Telefonica (TEF.MC), which is seeking to buy KPN's E-Plus Germany unit, some analysts have said.

Earlier this week, Telefonica raised its offer by 6 percent to 8.55 billion euros, and it won America Movil's support for the deal.

The E-Plus sale will provide cash that will improve KPN's balance sheet, and although it leaves the company without direct exposure to Europe's biggest mobile market, it makes America Movil's 2.40 euro a share offer less attractive, analysts said.

In a research note written before the KPN foundation's announcement, analysts at Sanford Bernstein said, "We think that KPN could be worth as much as 3 euros per share."

But raising the offer price would be out of character for billionaire Slim, who has accumulated a buiness empire stretching from retail and financial services companies to infrastructure and oil and gas drilling companies by buying undervalued companies.

Foundations, such as KPN's, have been used as a tactic in high-profile corporate battles including LVMH's (LVMH.PA) failed hostile takeover of Gucci in 1999 and hedge funds' efforts to replace the board and break up chip equipment maker ASM International (ASMI.AS) in 2008.

Shares of America Movil, which bought nearly 30 percent of KPN last year, initially rose on the announcement, reflecting the unpopularity of the KPN investment. The purchase has so far resulted in billions of pesos in paper losses for America Movil, Slim's flagship company.

Shares of Slim's company ended down 0.16 percent at 12.81 pesos in trading in Mexico. KPN's shares closed down 0.65 percent at ! 2.28 euro! s on Thursday, before the foundation's announcement.

A spokeswoman for America Movil declined to comment.

"The fear now will be that Slim will now try to exit - any sign that he will throw in the towel and sell down his stake will hang over the KPN shares," said the person familiar with the sector.

(Reporting by Sara Webb, additional reporting by Robert-Jan Bartunek in Brussels, Leila Abboud in Paris, Elinor Comlay and Tomas Sarmiento in Mexico City; Editing by Tom Pfeiffer, Steve Orlofsky and Carol Bishopric)



U.S. and Switzerland Reach Deal on Bank Penalties

Switzerland and the United States reached a watershed deal on Thursday to punish Swiss banks that helped wealthy Americans stash money in hidden offshore accounts, closing the door on an era of bank secrecy and tax evasion.

The formal agreement, which was announced on Thursday by the Justice Department in Washington and will be presented by Swiss authorities on Friday, outlined formulas for Swiss banks to pay up to billions of dollars in fines and to disclose details of American account holders, a joint statement said.

The deal calls for stiff measures that lift the veil of Swiss secrecy. Banks will be required to hand over details on accounts in which American taxpayers have a direct or indirect interest; turn over account information through treaty channels between the two sides; inform on other banks that transferred money into secret accounts or that accepted money when secret accounts were closed; disclose all cross-border activities; and close the accounts of Americans evading taxes.

Significantly, the deal does not cover 14 Swiss banks and Swiss branches of international banks that are under criminal investigation by the United States authorities, including Credit Suisse, Julius Baer and several cantonal, or regional, banks. Instead, it effectively covers the rest of the Swiss banking industry, home to a tradition of bank confidentiality and laws that have not considered tax evasion a crime. Switzerland is home to more than $2 trillion in overseas deposits.

“This program will significantly enhance the Justice Department’s ongoing efforts to aggressively pursue those who attempt to evade the law by hiding their assets outside of the United States,” Attorney General Eric Holder said in a statement.

He added that the program, outlined over 11 pages, “is intended to enable every Swiss bank that is not already under criminal investigation to find a path to resolution.”

The agreement said that Swiss banks that follow the program will not be prosecuted and instead will be eligible to enter nonprosecution agreements that do not involve guilty pleas or criminal penalties.

Mr. Holder’s statement suggested that some unidentified Swiss banks were not cooperating and thus could face indictment. The agreement, he said, “creates significant risks for individuals and banks that continue to fail to cooperate, including for those Swiss banks that facilitated U.S. tax evasion but fail to cooperate now, for all U.S. taxpayers who think that they can continue to hide income and assets in offshore banks, and for those advisers and others who facilitated these crimes.”

The agreement will also turn up the heat on American clients who have not already entered voluntary disclosure programs with the Internal Revenue Service.

Banks that enabled tax evasion after the United States authorities began a broad investigation about 2008 will face more severe punishment. Banks that held accounts as of Aug. 1, 2008, will pay a fine equal to 20 percent of the dollar value of all nondisclosed accounts. The fine increases to 30 percent for secret accounts opened after that date but before March 2009, and to 50 percent for accounts opened after that.

American officials were angered that some Swiss banks accepted clients who were fleeing UBS, the largest Swiss bank, about 2009, when it averted indictment by reaching a $780 million deferred prosecution agreement with United States officials.

The Justice Department has not put a final tally on the total amount that Swiss banks will pay in fines under the deal, an American government official said, in part because it does not yet know the number. Both sides signed the final deal after the Swiss Federal Council on Wednesday instructed the country’s finance officials to put the finishing touches on the agreement.

Switzerland has been locked in thorny negotiations with Washington over the tax-evasion issue since 2009. Scores of Swiss bankers, lawyers and American taxpayers have been indicted in recent years, and last year the United States government indicted Wegelin & Company, the oldest Swiss bank, putting it out of business. Negotiations took a turn for the worse in recent years amid conflicts between Justice Department officials and Michael Ambuehl, the former top Swiss negotiator who stepped down last May.

A previous attempt by the Swiss government to arrange a deal failed in June, when Parliament balked, reflecting concerns about privacy and complaints that the agreement was being negotiated in secret. Legislators then called on Eveline Widmer-Schlumpf, the Swiss finance minister and president of the Federal Council, to work out an agreement with Washington.

William Sharp, a tax lawyer representing American clients of Swiss banks, said that the agreement represented “an end to the five-year declared war by the Justice Department and the Internal Revenue Service on Swiss bank secrecy, with the Swiss by and large preserving its premiere private banking brand.” He added that the dispute leading to the deal had dented trade and travel between the two countries and chilled Swiss investment in the United States.

A stumbling block may still exist. The deal calls for both sides to use information exchange channels outlined in existing treaties to disclose details of Americans. But the United States has not yet ratified a 2009 treaty protocol that would ease that disclosure, with Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, blocking approval, arguing that it would give the I.R.S. too much power and violate Americans’ right to privacy.



U.S. and Switzerland Reach Deal on Bank Penalties

Switzerland and the United States reached a watershed deal on Thursday to punish Swiss banks that helped wealthy Americans stash money in hidden offshore accounts, closing the door on an era of bank secrecy and tax evasion.

The formal agreement, which was announced on Thursday by the Justice Department in Washington and will be presented by Swiss authorities on Friday, outlined formulas for Swiss banks to pay up to billions of dollars in fines and to disclose details of American account holders, a joint statement said.

The deal calls for stiff measures that lift the veil of Swiss secrecy. Banks will be required to hand over details on accounts in which American taxpayers have a direct or indirect interest; turn over account information through treaty channels between the two sides; inform on other banks that transferred money into secret accounts or that accepted money when secret accounts were closed; disclose all cross-border activities; and close the accounts of Americans evading taxes.

Significantly, the deal does not cover 14 Swiss banks and Swiss branches of international banks that are under criminal investigation by the United States authorities, including Credit Suisse, Julius Baer and several cantonal, or regional, banks. Instead, it effectively covers the rest of the Swiss banking industry, home to a tradition of bank confidentiality and laws that have not considered tax evasion a crime. Switzerland is home to more than $2 trillion in overseas deposits.

“This program will significantly enhance the Justice Department’s ongoing efforts to aggressively pursue those who attempt to evade the law by hiding their assets outside of the United States,” Attorney General Eric Holder said in a statement.

He added that the program, outlined over 11 pages, “is intended to enable every Swiss bank that is not already under criminal investigation to find a path to resolution.”

The agreement said that Swiss banks that follow the program will not be prosecuted and instead will be eligible to enter nonprosecution agreements that do not involve guilty pleas or criminal penalties.

Mr. Holder’s statement suggested that some unidentified Swiss banks were not cooperating and thus could face indictment. The agreement, he said, “creates significant risks for individuals and banks that continue to fail to cooperate, including for those Swiss banks that facilitated U.S. tax evasion but fail to cooperate now, for all U.S. taxpayers who think that they can continue to hide income and assets in offshore banks, and for those advisers and others who facilitated these crimes.”

The agreement will also turn up the heat on American clients who have not already entered voluntary disclosure programs with the Internal Revenue Service.

Banks that enabled tax evasion after the United States authorities began a broad investigation about 2008 will face more severe punishment. Banks that held accounts as of Aug. 1, 2008, will pay a fine equal to 20 percent of the dollar value of all nondisclosed accounts. The fine increases to 30 percent for secret accounts opened after that date but before March 2009, and to 50 percent for accounts opened after that.

American officials were angered that some Swiss banks accepted clients who were fleeing UBS, the largest Swiss bank, about 2009, when it averted indictment by reaching a $780 million deferred prosecution agreement with United States officials.

The Justice Department has not put a final tally on the total amount that Swiss banks will pay in fines under the deal, an American government official said, in part because it does not yet know the number. Both sides signed the final deal after the Swiss Federal Council on Wednesday instructed the country’s finance officials to put the finishing touches on the agreement.

Switzerland has been locked in thorny negotiations with Washington over the tax-evasion issue since 2009. Scores of Swiss bankers, lawyers and American taxpayers have been indicted in recent years, and last year the United States government indicted Wegelin & Company, the oldest Swiss bank, putting it out of business. Negotiations took a turn for the worse in recent years amid conflicts between Justice Department officials and Michael Ambuehl, the former top Swiss negotiator who stepped down last May.

A previous attempt by the Swiss government to arrange a deal failed in June, when Parliament balked, reflecting concerns about privacy and complaints that the agreement was being negotiated in secret. Legislators then called on Eveline Widmer-Schlumpf, the Swiss finance minister and president of the Federal Council, to work out an agreement with Washington.

William Sharp, a tax lawyer representing American clients of Swiss banks, said that the agreement represented “an end to the five-year declared war by the Justice Department and the Internal Revenue Service on Swiss bank secrecy, with the Swiss by and large preserving its premiere private banking brand.” He added that the dispute leading to the deal had dented trade and travel between the two countries and chilled Swiss investment in the United States.

A stumbling block may still exist. The deal calls for both sides to use information exchange channels outlined in existing treaties to disclose details of Americans. But the United States has not yet ratified a 2009 treaty protocol that would ease that disclosure, with Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, blocking approval, arguing that it would give the I.R.S. too much power and violate Americans’ right to privacy.



Nasdaq Blames a Surge of Data for Trading Halt

The Nasdaq OMX Group on Thursday attributed last week’s three-hour trading halt a surge of data that overwhelmed its server, in the stock market operator’s most detailed accounting yet of the market outage.

In a statement, the company highlighted more than 20 attempts by Arca, one of the exchanges run by NYSE Euronext to connect and then disconnect to the system that provides prices for recent trades in Nasdaq stocks. Those were accompanied by what Nasdaq described as a stream of quotes for inaccurate symbols from Arca, which Nasdaq’s system was forced to reject.

The two incidents together inundated Nasdaq’s system with more than twice the data that it was designed to handle.

A flaw in Nasdaq’s own server then emerged that essentially led to the failure of the backup system to kick in, forcing to shut down the system. At 12:14 p.m., the exchange sent a notice to traders notifying them of the complete market halt.

While Nasdaq fixed the problem within 30 minutes of halting trading, it took additional time to contact other markets and regulators. Trading resumed around 3:30 p.m.

“They obviously had issues, and it caused an event,” Robert Greifeld, Nasdaq’s chief executive, said in a telephone interview on Thursday, referring to the NYSE exchange. “We obviously had issues, we should be able to handle that. We were supposed to be able to fail over, and we did not.”

He added that Nasdaq was not blaming Arca for the outage. But he said Nasdaq was accepting responsibility for its share of problems while also pointing to what he described as broader issues affecting the stock market industry. Those include information security and data capacity, with specific recommendations being made within 30 days.

A NYSE Euronext spokesman declined to comment.



U.S. Scrutinizes Private Equity Hiring of Ex-Army Officer

Government lawyers have asked the private equity firm headed by the prominent financier Lynn Tilton for information related to its recent hiring of a former Army official, according to people briefed on the matter.

The former Army official, Col. Norbert E. Vergez, headed a unit that awarded lucrative business to a helicopter company owned by Ms. Tilton’s firm, Partriarch Partners. Last Friday, the civil arm of the Justice Department asked Patriarch to provide it with documents related to Mr. Vergez.

The inquiry is expected to examine Mr. Vergez’s government activities, his dealings with Patriarch and how he came to be hired by the firm in February, according to an official who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly.

Until he retired late last year, Mr. Vergez ran a multibillion-dollar Pentagon unit that purchased helicopters for the Army and United States allies. In 2011, Ms. Tilton’s company, MD Helicopters, won a contract from that unit for six helicopters to be used in Afghanistan worth nearly $200 million. The deal could be even more beneficial, reaching as many as 54 aircraft over the life of a four-year deal.

In a statement, Ms. Tilton said she and Patriarch were fully cooperating with the inquiry and was confident it would not affect her firm or any of its companies.

“MD and Patriarch are squeaky clean,” the statement said. “Our only fear is of any specter that the press might cast and not of any truth that an investigation will find.”

Mr. Vergez, a senior vice president at Patriarch overseeing aviation and aerospace investments, did not return calls seeking comment. A spokesman for the Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Whatever the case, the inquiry is likely to put Patriarch in an uncomfortable spotlight at a time when Ms. Tilton has been promoting herself and her companies.

While most private equity executives shun publicity, the colorful Ms. Tilton embraces it. Earlier this month, the self-described “turnaround queen” sat for an interview with Bloomberg Businessweek and gave a reporter a tour of an MD Helicopter factory in her trademark five-inch stilettos. In a video interview with The Wall Street Journal earlier this summer, she described Patriarch as “the largest female-owned business in America.”

Patriarch, which is based in New York, specializes in buying ailing businesses on the cheap and trying to turn them around. It owns 75 companies with a total of 120,000 employees and revenue of more than $8 billion, according to the firm’s Web site. Holdings include Rand McNally maps, Stila Cosmetics and Dura Automotive. When Patriarch bought MD Helicopters in 2005, the company â€" originally a business owned by the aviation mogul Howard Hughes â€" stood on the edge of collapse.

Davidson Goldin, a Patriarch spokesman, said that the firm and Ms. Tilton did not know Mr. Vergez before MD Helicopters obtained the military contact in 2011. And since Mr. Vergez joined Patriarch, he added, the firm has not secured any new government business.

Before Mr. Vergez joined Patriarch, he served for 25 years in the Army, where he flew Black Hawk, Apache and Cobra helicopters earlier in his career. Since 2010, he ran a multibillion-dollar program that buys helicopters, including the Russian-made Mi-17 and provides them to United States allies. The program for purchasing so-called nonstandard rotary wing aircraft is meant in part to assist allies like Afghanistan and Iraq whose armies are more accustomed to flying Russian-made helicopters.

The office, which was established in 2010 and is based in Huntsville, Ala., came under scrutiny last year after the Defense Department’s inspector general determined that the Army officials “did not adequately manage the acquisition and support” of aircraft. A report issued by the inspector general said that defense officials kept poor records of their purchases of Russian aircraft.

At the time the report was issued, Mr. Vergez said his office was correcting the program’s shortcomings.
On Thursday, Reuters reported that the Pentagon had opened a criminal investigation into the office formerly run by Mr. Vergez. Government officials are examining the payments and relationships between the office and helicopter manufacturers, a person briefed on the matter said, according to Reuters.

Mr. Vergez approached Patriarch about a job in April 2012 with written authorization from an ethics officer to do so, said Mr. Goldin, the Patriarch spokesman. Outside lawyers for Patriarch vetted Mr. Vergez’s hiring, Mr. Goldin said.

While she now has to deal with the legal inquiry involving Mr. Vergez, Ms. Tilton has had recent success in the courts. Last month, MD Helicopters prevailed in a legal dispute with Boeing. An arbitration panel ruled in favor of MD Helicopter after Boeing supposedly tried to block it from competing for military business. In June, a judge dismissed a case brought against Patriarch by the bond insurer MBIA related to a contract dispute.

But more than her courtroom battles, Ms. Tilton has attracted attention for her flamboyant personal style. In a 2011 television interview with Barbara Walters, Ms. Tilton gave a tour of her four closets full of shoes â€" 500 pairs, categorized by color photographs taped to the front of each shoe box. She filmed a pilot for a reality show for the Sundance Channel but the project was abandoned. In a clip from the show, “Diva of Distressed,” she tries to assuage a concerned group of executives at a company that she had recently acquired. “It’s only men I strip and flip,” she said. “My companies I keep long term and close to my heart.”

Ms. Tilton has owned MD Helicopters for eight years, and when she lost her first bid for an Army contract in 2006 to EADS, a European rival, she blasted the government.

“The United States is struggling to stay competitive with its global neighbors and our own taxpayer money is being poured into the coffers of foreign companies,” Ms. Tilton said at the time. “That money could be going to rebuild this industry in our country. It is a true injustice.”



U.S. Scrutinizes Private Equity Hiring of Ex-Army Officer

Government lawyers have asked the private equity firm headed by the prominent financier Lynn Tilton for information related to its recent hiring of a former Army official, according to people briefed on the matter.

The former Army official, Col. Norbert E. Vergez, headed a unit that awarded lucrative business to a helicopter company owned by Ms. Tilton’s firm, Partriarch Partners. Last Friday, the civil arm of the Justice Department asked Patriarch to provide it with documents related to Mr. Vergez.

The inquiry is expected to examine Mr. Vergez’s government activities, his dealings with Patriarch and how he came to be hired by the firm in February, according to an official who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly.

Until he retired late last year, Mr. Vergez ran a multibillion-dollar Pentagon unit that purchased helicopters for the Army and United States allies. In 2011, Ms. Tilton’s company, MD Helicopters, won a contract from that unit for six helicopters to be used in Afghanistan worth nearly $200 million. The deal could be even more beneficial, reaching as many as 54 aircraft over the life of a four-year deal.

In a statement, Ms. Tilton said she and Patriarch were fully cooperating with the inquiry and was confident it would not affect her firm or any of its companies.

“MD and Patriarch are squeaky clean,” the statement said. “Our only fear is of any specter that the press might cast and not of any truth that an investigation will find.”

Mr. Vergez, a senior vice president at Patriarch overseeing aviation and aerospace investments, did not return calls seeking comment. A spokesman for the Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Whatever the case, the inquiry is likely to put Patriarch in an uncomfortable spotlight at a time when Ms. Tilton has been promoting herself and her companies.

While most private equity executives shun publicity, the colorful Ms. Tilton embraces it. Earlier this month, the self-described “turnaround queen” sat for an interview with Bloomberg Businessweek and gave a reporter a tour of an MD Helicopter factory in her trademark five-inch stilettos. In a video interview with The Wall Street Journal earlier this summer, she described Patriarch as “the largest female-owned business in America.”

Patriarch, which is based in New York, specializes in buying ailing businesses on the cheap and trying to turn them around. It owns 75 companies with a total of 120,000 employees and revenue of more than $8 billion, according to the firm’s Web site. Holdings include Rand McNally maps, Stila Cosmetics and Dura Automotive. When Patriarch bought MD Helicopters in 2005, the company â€" originally a business owned by the aviation mogul Howard Hughes â€" stood on the edge of collapse.

Davidson Goldin, a Patriarch spokesman, said that the firm and Ms. Tilton did not know Mr. Vergez before MD Helicopters obtained the military contact in 2011. And since Mr. Vergez joined Patriarch, he added, the firm has not secured any new government business.

Before Mr. Vergez joined Patriarch, he served for 25 years in the Army, where he flew Black Hawk, Apache and Cobra helicopters earlier in his career. Since 2010, he ran a multibillion-dollar program that buys helicopters, including the Russian-made Mi-17 and provides them to United States allies. The program for purchasing so-called nonstandard rotary wing aircraft is meant in part to assist allies like Afghanistan and Iraq whose armies are more accustomed to flying Russian-made helicopters.

The office, which was established in 2010 and is based in Huntsville, Ala., came under scrutiny last year after the Defense Department’s inspector general determined that the Army officials “did not adequately manage the acquisition and support” of aircraft. A report issued by the inspector general said that defense officials kept poor records of their purchases of Russian aircraft.

At the time the report was issued, Mr. Vergez said his office was correcting the program’s shortcomings.
On Thursday, Reuters reported that the Pentagon had opened a criminal investigation into the office formerly run by Mr. Vergez. Government officials are examining the payments and relationships between the office and helicopter manufacturers, a person briefed on the matter said, according to Reuters.

Mr. Vergez approached Patriarch about a job in April 2012 with written authorization from an ethics officer to do so, said Mr. Goldin, the Patriarch spokesman. Outside lawyers for Patriarch vetted Mr. Vergez’s hiring, Mr. Goldin said.

While she now has to deal with the legal inquiry involving Mr. Vergez, Ms. Tilton has had recent success in the courts. Last month, MD Helicopters prevailed in a legal dispute with Boeing. An arbitration panel ruled in favor of MD Helicopter after Boeing supposedly tried to block it from competing for military business. In June, a judge dismissed a case brought against Patriarch by the bond insurer MBIA related to a contract dispute.

But more than her courtroom battles, Ms. Tilton has attracted attention for her flamboyant personal style. In a 2011 television interview with Barbara Walters, Ms. Tilton gave a tour of her four closets full of shoes â€" 500 pairs, categorized by color photographs taped to the front of each shoe box. She filmed a pilot for a reality show for the Sundance Channel but the project was abandoned. In a clip from the show, “Diva of Distressed,” she tries to assuage a concerned group of executives at a company that she had recently acquired. “It’s only men I strip and flip,” she said. “My companies I keep long term and close to my heart.”

Ms. Tilton has owned MD Helicopters for eight years, and when she lost her first bid for an Army contract in 2006 to EADS, a European rival, she blasted the government.

“The United States is struggling to stay competitive with its global neighbors and our own taxpayer money is being poured into the coffers of foreign companies,” Ms. Tilton said at the time. “That money could be going to rebuild this industry in our country. It is a true injustice.”



Vodafone Needs to Deliver for Shareholders if Deal Goes Through

If Vittorio Colao could achieve only one thing as chief executive of Vodafone, it might be to sort out the company’s messy American mobile venture with Verizon. Vodafone has confirmed it is in talks to sell its 45 percent stake in Verizon Wireless to its partner. A good deal here would represent a tremendous outcome for Mr. Colao.

A Vodafone exit from Verizon Wireless has clear strategic logic. The group lacks control of the venture and the American market is getting more competitive. Price has been an obstacle, says a person familiar with the situation.

But the possible transaction value of up to $130 billion, as reported by Bloomberg News, looks acceptable to Vodafone. At about eight times earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization and 2014 as estimated by Citigroup analysts, it would be a slight premium to Verizon, reflecting Verizon Wireless’ higher-quality earnings.

A further obstacle is a possible capital gains tax bill for Vodafone, once estimated to be up to $30 billion. In reality, this may be a lot less: Citi estimates only $5 billion. That’s because Vodafone could structure the deal in a way that loads the liability on assets that have recently fallen in value.

For Verizon, a deal is likely to enhance its earnings while giving it the benefits of full control. The beginning of the end of low interest rates is another reason to move since Verizon will have to borrow to finance the deal.

A successful transaction would define Mr. Colao’s tenure at Vodafone. The 8 percent share price jump on Aug. 29 to 205 pence puts intense pressure on him to deliver, though. And his ability to do that may be hampered if Verizon’s shares now come under pressure, depressing the value of the paper element of any offer.

A desirable and plausible outcome would be that Vodafone gets around $60 billion to $70 billion of cash, with the rest split equally between preference shares and Verizon stock. There is a risk that Mr. Colao would still squander the bonanza proceeds on ill-judged expansion. But the cash could finance for a substantial Vodafone share buyback.

The post-deal Vodafone would be a smaller, better capitalized business more capable of paying progressive dividends and driving European consolidation. But the current share price still only assumes a deal worth $115 billion. If Mr. Colao gets a better price, and gives shareholders the proceeds, all well and good. For now, the market has pushed the shares up high enough.

Christopher Hughes is a columnist for Reuters Breakingviews. For more independent commentary and analysis, visit breakingviews.com.



Blackstone Settles I.P.O. Class-Action Suit

Blackstone has agreed to pay $85 million to settle a lawsuit brought by a group of investors that accused it of misrepresenting some investments ahead of its 2007 initial public offering.

The settlement was filed in Federal District Court in Manhattan on Wednesday and closes the door on a five-year legal battle with investors who contended that the firm misrepresented the value of three investments in its prospectus. Blackstone denied any wrongdoing or liability in the settlement.

By settling, Blackstone has avoided a securities class-action trial that was scheduled to begin next month. Shares of Blackstone rose 2 percent on Thursday, to $22.08.

In June 2007, at the peak of the private equity boom, Blackstone raised $4.1 billion in a share offering on the New York Stock Exchange with much fanfare. It was one of the first of a group of highly secretive private equity firms to go public, attracting the kind of media attention normally left for Hollywood movie premieres. Camera operators and reporters lined up at the stock exchange to cover the event, according to a New York Times report at the time.

“We may be witnessing the end of capitalism as we know it,” Tom Wolfe, the author of “Bonfire of the Vanities,” told CNBC, according to the report.

But the shares, which listed at $31 a share and rose on the first day of trading to $35.06, quickly fell in value amid wider market volatility.

A group of investors, unhappy with the way the company disclosed its investments, filed a complaint against the company and its chairman, Stephen Schwarzman, less than a year after the listing in April 2008. They contended the Blackstone did not properly disclose the value of its investments in three companies - a monoline insurer, a semiconductor manufacturer and a real estate company. These investments were already losing value at the time of the I.P.O., they argued, posing a potential risk to the firm’s performance fees.

A year after Blackstone’s I.P.O., its stock had lost nearly half its value and was trading at $18.15 a share.

The settlement puts an end to a long and complicated legal process. The case was initially thrown out in 2009 by Judge Harold Baer of Federal District Court but was revived on appeal in early 2011. A later appeal by Blackstone was rejected in October 2011.

During the process, more than five million pages of documents were handed over to the court from Blackstone and nearly 25 third parties, according to the settlement papers. Before the settlement, Judge Baer was expected to examine the documents and disposition again carefully before deciding whether to dismiss the case.

“We’re delighted at the result,” said Samuel H Rudman, a lawyer with Robbins Geller Rudman and Dowd, co-lead counsel for the plaintiffs.

A representative for Blackstone could not be reached for comment.



Use the Airline’s App, and Other Tips for Flying Efficiency

When I’m filming a TV series, like the shows I host for PBS, I have to fly a lot. Over the last four years, I’ve honed the art of efficient air travel to a sparkling shine.

I could publish my accumulated wisdom in a small book and sell literally dozens of copies. But no: I selflessly offer then to you here, for free.

* Check in with the airline app. If you have your airline’s free app on your phone, you can check in ahead of time, even the night before, and save yourself the worry of getting to the airport an hour before the flight.

At that point, the app can also display the bar code representing your boarding pass. No paper. Just set your phone face down on the little T.S.A. scanner, and you’re through. Not all airlines have the bar code scanners, but the app will let you know ahead of time.

(Kudos, in particular, to Delta’s app. It’s beautiful, typographically intelligent and loaded with great features. You can change your seat, track your luggage’s location, check your position on the standby list or upgrade list, and so on.)

* Save the pass to Passbook. If you have an iPhone, use the button called Save to Passbook. This button appears when you’re viewing the bar code in the better airline apps, including Delta, American and United.

Apple’s promotion of this app always seemed to suggest that its value is keeping all of your boarding passes and event e-tickets in one place. But Passbook’s real value is much simpler; it adds a banner representing your flight on the phone’s Lock screen.

That is, every time you need to show your boarding pass (twice in the T.S.A. line, once at the gate), you don’t have to unlock your phone, open an app and navigate to the bar code. Just wake the phone and swipe across the banner. Your bar code is there, instantaneously.

* Use FlightTrack Pro. This app is almost a miracle. It knows every detail about your flight â€" time, gate, terminal, airspeed, time remaining and so on â€" even before the airport monitors and airline agents do. (I wrote more about it here.)

* See if you can bypass the T.S.A. lines. If you fly often to or from the San Francisco, San Jose, Orlando, Denver, Dallas, Houston, San Antonio or Westchester airports, it might be worth getting the Clear card for $180 a year. (A spouse or child is $50.) It lets you jump to the front of the security line in those airports.

If that’s a bit rich for your blood, you should also look into the TSA PreCheck program. It’s fantastic. It lets you walk through an old-style, door-frame-type security scanner â€" without removing your laptop, coat, shoes, belt or watch. The details are in my April 2012 post here; since then, PreCheck has spread to more airports and airlines.

* Carry a butterfly laptop bag. You don’t have to take your laptop out of its bag to go through security. T.S.A.-approved bags keep the laptop in a flat compartment of its own, easily visible to the scanners. So you don’t need to fuss with plastic bins or worrying about leaving your laptop behind (it happens). Here’s the one I bought.

* Don’t take out the Kindle or tablet. E-book readers, iPads and other tablets don’t have to come out of your carry-on bag to go through security. Don’t waste your time, and everyone else’s, by unpacking and repacking it.

* Know what the scanner cares about. Most major airports now use the millimeter-wave scanning booths â€" you know, the ones where you stand still with your arms in the air like you’re being mugged. (They often bear the unfortunate, but apropos, name Rapiscan.) Many travelers are unduly terrified of these things. They take off their watches, rings, necklaces, glasses, belts and anything with metal â€" and thereby hold up the whole line.

In fact, that’s unnecessary. Jewelry and glasses don’t trigger the alarm. Neither do watches, unless they’re the gigantic he-man metal-hunk style. Leave them on. (I also leave my belt on. About once in 10 times, the agent on the far side of the booth asks to pass his hand-held scanner over my belt buckle, but that’s about it.)

* Be brave in repacking the overhead bins. Ever since the airlines started charging for luggage, people began carrying more hand-held luggage. Those overhead bins fill up, and the next thing you know, you’re being asked to check your carry-on! That means 25 minutes of extra waiting when you land.

Here’s the thing, though: you can almost always make room for one more bag by rearranging stuff that other people have already put up in the overhead bins. You see the flight attendants do it all the time; why shouldn’t you?

For example, you’ll frequently see an overcoat lying there, occupying enough space for an entire roll-on bag. Or a shopping bag, briefcase or backpack laid horizontally that could stand upright and take up a lot less space.

If it’s worth it to you to avoid the 25-minute wait in baggage claim, it’s possible to overcome your instinctive fear of touching other people’s things. Target your spot in the bin, ask the people sitting there politely if you can adjust their stuff, then do it (when you’re not blocking the aisle, of course!). For example, you can often slip your roll-in bag beneath someone’s jacket. It’s amazing how often you can find room if you really try.

* Pack noise-canceling headphones, or cheap foam earplugs. Airplane cabins are loud. I can’t imagine that it’s good for your hearing to sit there for hours without ear protection, especially if you fly a lot. If you don’t plan to listen to music, those cheap drugstore earplugs cut down on the sound by more than half. If those are a little goofy looking for you, you can also invest in noise-canceling headphones. (Here’s my most recent roundup.)

Flying is still expensive, annoying and environmentally damaging. But if you have to fly, at least these tips can help you make flying less frustrating.



Morning Agenda: Vodafone in Talks Over $115 Billion Deal

The British telecommunications company Vodafone confirmed on Thursday it was in talks over the potential sale of its 45 percent stake in the United States carrier Verizon Wireless, its joint venture with Verizon Communications, DealBook’s Mark Scott reports. Analysts have estimated that the stake could be worth more than $115 billion.

The deal would be one of the largest worldwide in the last decade and would end a partnership that started in 1999. In its brief statement on Thursday, Vodafone said there was “no certainty that an agreement will be reached.”

“One of the biggest hurdles to the potential deal is the large tax bill Vodafone would have to pay to dispose of its holding in Verizon Wireless,” Mr. Scott writes. “Earlier this year, however, Verizon said it could structure any potential transaction to limit Vodafone’s tax liabilities.”

HEDGE FUND MANAGERS WRITE SMALL CHECKS IN MAYORAL RACE  | Hedge fund giants have turned out to support a Democrat, Christine C. Quinn, with $170,336 in contributions to her campaign for mayor of New York, DealBook’s Alexandra Stevenson reports. “Paltry though the sum seems, it is more than twice the amount received by the next closest recipient in the mayoral race, Joseph J. Lhota, a Republican, according to records compiled by the public affairs lobbying organization Common Cause.”

The political checks from hedge fund managers are small compared with the sums they invest in the markets, largely because New York law caps individual contributions to mayoral candidates at $4,950. Some of the industry’s biggest names are missing from the donors’ list altogether, while a few have given amounts as small as $100.

Still, the most politically outspoken include George Soros, chairman of Soros Fund Management, who publicly announced his support for the Democratic front-runner, Bill de Blasio, several weeks ago. Among the donors to Republican candidates is the activist investor Carl C. Icahn. James S. Chanos, founder of Kynikos Associates, put it this way: “It’s hard to think how any hedge fund would directly benefit from city politics.”

ON THE AGENDA  |  A revised estimate of growth of gross domestic product in the second quarter is released at 8:30 a.m. Salesforce.com reports earnings after the market closes. W. Edmund Clark, the head of Toronto-Dominion Bank, is on CNBC at 4:30 p.m.

ASIAN MARKETS AND SYRIA CONCERNS  | The prospect of military action in Syria caused turmoil in emerging markets on Wednesday and pushed oil prices higher, The New York Times reports. As the White House was contemplating a “limited” attack on Syria, the price of benchmark crude oil jumped from about $107 a barrel at the start of the week to more than $112, before declining to around $110.

“Asian markets have been under pressure for weeks, over fears that the United States Federal Reserve will start tempering its stimulus effort,” The Times reports. “Now, investors are worried that rising oil prices could further undermine growth in the region.”

Mergers & Acquisitions »

Playtech Looks to Spend $800 Million on Acquisitions  |  Playtech, a maker of gambling software, said it was looking to spend more than $800 million on acquisitions. REUTERS

Bidders Line Up for E*Trade Unit  |  Citadel and Virtu Financial are among the bidders for the market-making unit of E*Trade Financial, Reuters reports, citing unidentified people with knowledge of the situation. REUTERS

Britain Orders Ryanair to Cut Stake in Aer Lingus  |  British regulators have ordered Ryanair to reduce its 29 percent stake in Aer Lingus to 5 percent, arguing that the holding threatens competition on routes between Ireland and Britain. DealBook »

Carlyle to Invest in Warehouses in China  |  The Carlyle Group and the Townsend Group plan to invest about $200 million to buy and build 17 warehouses in China, Reuters reports. REUTERS

INVESTMENT BANKING »

JPMorgan Bribery Inquiry Said to Uncover a Spreadsheet  |  As regulators look into whether JPMorgan Chase hired workers in Asia in an effort to win business from their relatives, the inquiry has uncovered a spreadsheet that “links some hiring decisions to specific transactions pursued by the bank,” according to Bloomberg News, which cites unidentified people with knowledge of the matter. BLOOMBERG NEWS

A Coming Sea Change in Derivatives Markets  |  Reuters writes: “The $300 trillion privately traded U.S. derivatives markets could be on the verge of the biggest change in their 30-year history if investors embrace new electronic trading platforms that would reduce the market dominance of large banks.” REUTERS

Barclays Hires Bankers to Lead Metals and Mining Group  |  Barclays hired Paul Knight from UBS and Michael Rawlinson from Liberum Capital, a boutique investment bank, to be co-heads of the global metals and mining team, Reuters reports. REUTERS

PRIVATE EQUITY »

Blackstone Agrees to Settlement Over Its I.P.O.  |  The Blackstone Group agreed to pay $85 million to settle a class-action lawsuit from investors over the private equity firm’s initial public offering in 2007, Reuters reports. The deal would prevent the case from going to trial next month. REUTERS

SeaWorld Stock Falls on Lower Attendance  |  Shares of SeaWorld Entertainment fell to their lowest level since the initial public offering in April after the company cut ticket prices amid a decline in attendance, Bloomberg News reports. The theme park operator was taken public by the Blackstone Group. BLOOMBERG NEWS

HEDGE FUNDS »

Karsch Capital to Shut Down  |  Michael Karsch is closing his hedge fund firm, Karsch Capital Management, after 13 years in business, Reuters reports. “I have decided to return capital to investors at the end of the third quarter,” Mr. Karsch said in a letter to investors. REUTERS

Ackman Should Stick With Heavy Industry  |  William A. Ackman’s exit from a disastrous investment in J.C. Penney underscores that retailing just is not his thing. But he might find more success with his stake in Air Products and Chemicals. REUTERS BREAKINGVIEWS

I.P.O./OFFERINGS »

Argentine Technology Firm Plans I.P.O. on N.Y.S.E.  |  Globant, an Argentine software and information technology services company, has filed to go public on the New York Stock Exchange, in a move to broaden its reach. DealBook »

What Twitter Can Learn From Facebook’s I.P.O.  | 
FINANCIAL TIMES

VENTURE CAPITAL »

In Fight Over Online TV Chatter, Twitter Buys a Referee  |  Twitter has purchased Trendrr, one of the leading independent firms analyzing the real-time conversation on social media for television channels, the Bits blog reports. NEW YORK TIMES BITS

LEGAL/REGULATORY »

U.S. and Switzerland Are Close to Deal on Penalizing Banks in Tax CaseU.S. and Switzerland Are Close to Deal on Penalizing Banks in Tax Case  |  A final settlement would likely require banks to pay a fine to the United States equivalent to 20 to 50 percent of the value of their undeclared American accounts, a person briefed on the matter said. DealBook »

Bank of England Governor Outlines Plan to Keep Rates Low  |  Mark Carney, in his first policy speech as governor of the Bank of England, said the central bank may add more stimulus to the economy if markets are putting upward pressure on interest rates. REUTERS

In Libor Inquiry, Spotlight on Higher-Ups  |  Authorities in the United States and Britain “want to know whether senior executives knew of, or participated in, illegal activity” surrounding the manipulation of the London interbank offered rate, The Wall Street Journal reports. WALL STREET JOURNAL

A Look at Yellen’s Wealth  |  According to an annual financial disclosure, Janet L. Yellen, the vice chairwoman of the Federal Reserve, “owned stock in a small number of companies including Conoco Phillips and Pfizer, but mostly invested in broad-based equity and bond funds,” The New York Times Economix blog writes. Her investments also include a stamp collection. NEW YORK TIMES

San Bernardino Is Eligible for Bankruptcy  |  A federal bankruptcy court judge on Wednesday granted the city of San Bernardino eligibility for bankruptcy protection, The New York Times reports. NEW YORK TIMES



Vodafone Confirms Talks With Verizon

The British telecommunications company Vodafone issued a statement Thursday confirming it is in talks over the potential sale of its 45 percent stake in the U.S. carrier Verizon Wireless, its joint venture with Verizon Communications.

“Vodafone notes the recent press speculation and confirms that it is in discussions with Verizon Communications Inc. regarding the possible disposal of Vodafone’s U.S. group, whose principal asset is its 45% interest in Verizon Wireless,” Vodafone’s brief statement said. “There is no certainty that an agreement will be reached,” it added.

A sale of Vodafone’s stake in Verizon Wireless would be a blockbuster deal. Analysts have estimated the stake could command more than $100 billion.