Total Pageviews

Hedge Fund Advertising Off to a Slow Start, Survey Finds

Hedge funds have not exactly rushed to take advantage of their new ability to advertise.

Far from it. Only a fraction of hedge funds and private equity firms have even registered under a new statute that gives them the ability to broadly solicit capital, according to a survey to be released on Monday by the data provider Preqin.

The survey found that 4 percent of hedge fund managers and 5 percent of private equity fund managers have registered to advertise under the JOBS Act, the law passed in 2012 that lifted a ban on “general solicitation.”

What is more, 55 percent of hedge fund managers and 63 percent of private equity fund managers said that they did not plan to advertise at the present time, while 8 percent of hedge fund managers and 14 percent of private equity managers said that they would never engage in advertising, the survey found.

The survey included more than 150 fund managers that are either based in the United States or have significant operations in this country.

Some firms are testing the waters. Balyasny Asset Management, a $4.3 billion hedge fund, recently used an image of snowboarders standing on a mountain to highlight its investing abilities.

But others see a stigma in using ads. According to Preqin, 20 percent of private equity managers cited a negative perception of marketing as the largest obstacle preventing them from taking the plunge.

Nearly a fourth of private equity managers cited additional costs as the largest obstacle, while 42 percent of hedge fund managers pointed to costs. About a fifth of private equity and hedge fund managers were concerned about increased scrutiny from the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Some simply wanted to let others go first. The survey found that 15 percent of private equity managers and 21 percent of hedge fund managers did not want to be the first to advertise.

That suggests that the current sluggish pace may pick up at some point.

“With the first adverts already printed, we could see a shift in attitude in the future, as alternative asset funds â€" in particular hedge funds â€" begin to think of new ways to attract a different audience to their vehicle,” Amy Bensted, the head of hedge fund products at Preqin, said in a statement.



Brazilian Firm Magnifies Focus on Distressed Debt

SAO PAULO, Brazil â€" The investment firm Jive Investments Holding Ltd., which acquired some of Lehman Brothers Brazilian assets in 2010, is raising a new $100 million distressed debt fund focused on nonperforming corporate loans, according to people briefed on the firm’s plans.

Jive, which is based in Sao Paulo, expects to close the offshore fund this year, possibly as early as the end of May, said these people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the plans. A Jive representative declined to comment.

The new fund is distinct from the distressed real estate funds that Jive already runs. Its structure is also expected to be more traditional, with Jive acting as the general partner and the largely foreign investors as limited partners. The firm is in advanced discussions with United States and British backers, one person said.

The move is likely to jump-start a still nascent market. Brazil has few sellers of distressed assets, especially nonperforming corporate loans. While foreign banks, in particular Citigroup and Banco Santander Brasil, have led the way, Brazil’s highly liquid banks have so far not felt pressure to follow suit.

Still, KPMG estimates sales of loan portfolios in Brazil are $10 billion to $20 billion a year. In addition to Jive, big players in the market here include Discovery, owned by BTG Pactual, and RCB Investimentos.

Jive was started in 2010 by Alexandre Cruz. who at the time was running NeoIntelligence, a Brazilian accounting and business process outsourcing firm with mostly United States clients. When some of them closed their Brazilian operations, he started buying their overdue account receivables.

The firm then acquired 816.1 million reais, or $480 million, in assets from Lehman Brothers in 2010 out of its bankruptcy proceedings. That portfolio included nonperforming corporate loans with an outstanding principal balance of 726 million reais, or $427 million, from 211 companies, according to court documents. Jive paid 27 million reais, or $15.9 million, for those assets, according to the documents.

Brazil’s economy was soaring then, so many here were more willing to settle debts, which helped Jive make out nicely, though the precise return has not been disclosed.

That performance won it admirers among foreign investors. One person praised the firm’s track record, saying “the Lehman assets really turned out well for them.”

Jive subsequently continued to acquire nonperforming loans and now owns unpaid loans with a face value of 3.1 billion reais, about half of them corporate.

Current economic conditions could present Jive and other firms with a greater opportunity.

Although economic growth is lagging in Brazil, credit continues to expand. The size of the country’s credit portfolio reached 2.733 trillion reais in February, a 14.7 percent increase compared with figures in the month a year earlier, according to a central bank report in March. That, combined with an expected increase in consumer and corporate defaults, could make banks more concerned about their increasing capital requirements and press them to sell nonperforming loans.

Jive appears to be anticipating such a scenario.

Still, credit may tighten in the short term in Brazil. The central bank this week raised its benchmark rate once again, to 11 percent. But that is not expected to continue.

Tony Volpon, an analyst at Nomura Securities, wrote in a research note that the bank’s “post-meeting communiqué brought language changes that strongly signal that the current tightening cycle is near its end.”



Weibo Seeks to Raise More Than $380 Million in I.P.O.

If all goes according to plan, the biggest of China’s Twitter-like microblogging services will raise more than $380 million in its coming initial public offering.

In a revised prospectus, the Sina Corporation‘s Weibo says that it hopes to price its sale of 20 million American depositary shares at $17 to $19 each. At the midpoint of that range, the company would be valued at $3.7 billion.

Should investors prove especially eager to own a piece of Weibo, underwriters could sell additional shares that would value the company at closer to $4 billion.

That would be a fraction of Twitter’s worth, which was more than $25 billion as of the market’s close on Friday. But it would still represent continued belief that Weibo will continue to build on its strong popularity in China.

Last year, Weibo (pronounced WAY-bwoh) was valued at about $3.3 billion when it accepted an investment from the Alibaba Group, the Chinese online commerce giant that is planning its own listing in the United States.

The company plans to list on the Nasdaq stock market under the ticker symbol “WB.” Its offering is being led by Goldman Sachs and Credit Suisse.



TPG and Others Said to Agree to Invest in Airbnb

A group of investors that includes TPG Growth has reached an agreement in principle to invest in Airbnb, the popular home-sharing site, valuing the start-up at about $10 billion, a person briefed on the matter said on Friday.

The investment would lift Airbnb into the upper echelons of Silicon Valley start-up valuations. Other members of the 11-digit club include WhatsApp, which Facebook bought in February for more than $16 billion, and Dropbox, which investors valued at roughly $10 billion last year.

At the value assigned by TPG Growth and others, Airbnb â€" which lets homeowners and apartment dwellers rent out their homes, spare rooms or couches to travelers â€" would be worth more than established hotel chains like Wyndham Worldwide or Hyatt.

The precise amount that the investment group, which had been in talks with Airbnb for several weeks, will provide was not immediately clear.

News of the investment’s status was reported earlier by The Wall Street Journal.



Activists Seen as Possibly Circling Symantec

Symantec is close to hiring JPMorgan Chase to defend the enterprise technology company against activist investors, people briefed on the matter said on Friday.

But it was not clear if any activist funds have acquired stakes in Symantec, which has a market value of more than $13.5 billion. No activist hedge funds have so far reported holdings in the company.

Symantec finds itself in the cross hairs just weeks after firing its chief executive, Steve Bennett. He  was the second C.E.O. to be ousted in less than two years, and was let go after he failed to jump-start revenues.

Michael Brown, a Symantec board member, is serving as interim chief executive.

Symantec offers both enterprise software and consumer programs like the Norton antivirus software, and the people briefed on the matter said that they believe activists could call for the company to split in two.

“We commonly engage financial advisers to help with our business but beyond that will not comment on any rumors or speculation,” Symantec said in a statement.

JPMorgan declined to comment.



Weekend Reading: High-Frequency Reading

This week we take an ultrafast look at the financial headlines.

Barnes & Noble had a bad day. Citigroup had a bad day. SAC has April 10 circled on the calendar. Michael Lewis had an interesting week. Now if you have some time left over, check out DealBook’s special section on the future of money.

A look back on our reporting of the past week’s highs and lows in finance.

THURSDAY

Liberty Media Will Sell Most of Its Investment in Barnes & Noble | DealBook »

In U.S. This Year, I.P.O.s Are Leaving the Gate at Full Speed | DealBook »

U.S. Ordered to Return Assets Held in Crackdown of Luxury Cars Exported to China | DealBook »

Overseer of Compliance at SAC Is Selected | DealBook »

Credit Suisse Sets Millions Aside in Justice Dept. Case | DealBook »

WEDNESDAY

Crime Inquiry Said to Open on Citigroup | DealBook »

Commodity Unit Chief Is Leaving JPMorgan | DealBook »

A Muddy Tract Now, but by 2020, China’s Answer to Wall Street | DealBook »

Unit of Deutsche Börse Faces U.S. Criminal Inquiry | DealBook »

The Trade: A Pivotal Financial Crisis Case, Ending With a Whimper | DealBook »

SPECIAL SECTION: FUTURE OF MONEY

A Revolution in Money | DealBook »

Tap to Pay (Not So Much in the U.S.) | DealBook »

Graphic: Where’s Satoshi Nakamoto? | DealBook »

Comics: How to Explain Bitcoin to Your Mom | DealBook »

To Instill Love of Bitcoin, Backers Work to Make It Safe | DealBook »

The Credit Card of Tomorrow: Software, Not Plastic | DealBook »

The Cashless Society Meets the Loose-Change Economy | DealBook »

Checks Are Expendable, but in Legal Tender We Trust | DealBook »

Essay: The Real Competition to Virtual Currency | DealBook »

Inside the (Smaller) Bank Branch of the Future | DealBook »

Tech Titans Are Vying to Be Your Pocketbook | DealBook »

Consumers Are Still Seeing Seams in the Mobile Wallet | DealBook »

Makers of Bitcoin A.T.M.’s See a Not-Quite-Cashless Future | DealBook »

Starting an Overdue Conversation About Money | DealBook »

TUESDAY

To Curtail Departures, SAC Pursues 2-Year Pacts | DealBook »

Graphic: Strong Start in Deal-Making | DealBook »

MONDAY

Scrutiny for Wall Street’s Warp Speed | DealBook »

DealBook Column: Fault Goes Deep in Ultrafast Trades | DealBook »

Sanctions or Not, Russian Sway in London May Be Bluster | DealBook »

WEEK IN VERSE

‘Bodies’ | Do not listen to Drowning Pool right before discussing high-frequency trading on cable television. YouTube »



Weekend Reading: High-Frequency Reading

This week we take an ultrafast look at the financial headlines.

Barnes & Noble had a bad day. Citigroup had a bad day. SAC has April 10 circled on the calendar. Michael Lewis had an interesting week. Now if you have some time left over, check out DealBook’s special section on the future of money.

A look back on our reporting of the past week’s highs and lows in finance.

THURSDAY

Liberty Media Will Sell Most of Its Investment in Barnes & Noble | DealBook »

In U.S. This Year, I.P.O.s Are Leaving the Gate at Full Speed | DealBook »

U.S. Ordered to Return Assets Held in Crackdown of Luxury Cars Exported to China | DealBook »

Overseer of Compliance at SAC Is Selected | DealBook »

Credit Suisse Sets Millions Aside in Justice Dept. Case | DealBook »

WEDNESDAY

Crime Inquiry Said to Open on Citigroup | DealBook »

Commodity Unit Chief Is Leaving JPMorgan | DealBook »

A Muddy Tract Now, but by 2020, China’s Answer to Wall Street | DealBook »

Unit of Deutsche Börse Faces U.S. Criminal Inquiry | DealBook »

The Trade: A Pivotal Financial Crisis Case, Ending With a Whimper | DealBook »

SPECIAL SECTION: FUTURE OF MONEY

A Revolution in Money | DealBook »

Tap to Pay (Not So Much in the U.S.) | DealBook »

Graphic: Where’s Satoshi Nakamoto? | DealBook »

Comics: How to Explain Bitcoin to Your Mom | DealBook »

To Instill Love of Bitcoin, Backers Work to Make It Safe | DealBook »

The Credit Card of Tomorrow: Software, Not Plastic | DealBook »

The Cashless Society Meets the Loose-Change Economy | DealBook »

Checks Are Expendable, but in Legal Tender We Trust | DealBook »

Essay: The Real Competition to Virtual Currency | DealBook »

Inside the (Smaller) Bank Branch of the Future | DealBook »

Tech Titans Are Vying to Be Your Pocketbook | DealBook »

Consumers Are Still Seeing Seams in the Mobile Wallet | DealBook »

Makers of Bitcoin A.T.M.’s See a Not-Quite-Cashless Future | DealBook »

Starting an Overdue Conversation About Money | DealBook »

TUESDAY

To Curtail Departures, SAC Pursues 2-Year Pacts | DealBook »

Graphic: Strong Start in Deal-Making | DealBook »

MONDAY

Scrutiny for Wall Street’s Warp Speed | DealBook »

DealBook Column: Fault Goes Deep in Ultrafast Trades | DealBook »

Sanctions or Not, Russian Sway in London May Be Bluster | DealBook »

WEEK IN VERSE

‘Bodies’ | Do not listen to Drowning Pool right before discussing high-frequency trading on cable television. YouTube »



Another High-Speed Trading Investigation

The list of federal and state agencies investigating the practice of high-frequency trading continues to grow.

Attorney General Eric H. Holder told a House panel on Friday that the Justice Department was investigating high-frequency trading “to determine whether it violates insider trading laws.” The disclosure from Mr. Holder came the same week that Michael Lewis’s new book, “Flash Boys: A Wall Street Revolt,” became the talk of Wall Street.

Earlier this week, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission confirmed their own continuing investigations. Regulators in New York State have a separate inquiry.

Appearing on CNBC on Friday, James B. Stewart, a columnist for The New York Times, noted that regulators’ interest in high-speed trading comes as the fourth anniversary approaches of the “flash crash,” when the Dow Jones industrial average fell almost 1,000 points in minutes and rapidly recovered. “We still don’t understand what happened there,” Mr. Stewart said. “I find that very, very frustrating.”

This post has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: April 4, 2014

An earlier version of this post gave an incorrect middle initial for the attorney general. He is Eric H. Holder, not Eric B. Holder.



Another High-Speed Trading Investigation

The list of federal and state agencies investigating the practice of high-frequency trading continues to grow.

Attorney General Eric H. Holder told a House panel on Friday that the Justice Department was investigating high-frequency trading “to determine whether it violates insider trading laws.” The disclosure from Mr. Holder came the same week that Michael Lewis’s new book, “Flash Boys: A Wall Street Revolt,” became the talk of Wall Street.

Earlier this week, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission confirmed their own continuing investigations. Regulators in New York State have a separate inquiry.

Appearing on CNBC on Friday, James B. Stewart, a columnist for The New York Times, noted that regulators’ interest in high-speed trading comes as the fourth anniversary approaches of the “flash crash,” when the Dow Jones industrial average fell almost 1,000 points in minutes and rapidly recovered. “We still don’t understand what happened there,” Mr. Stewart said. “I find that very, very frustrating.”

This post has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: April 4, 2014

An earlier version of this post gave an incorrect middle initial for the attorney general. He is Eric H. Holder, not Eric B. Holder.



2 Giant European Cement Makers Are in Merger Talks

PARIS â€" Holcim and Lafarge, two giant European cement makers, said Friday that they were in ‘‘advanced discussions’’ about a merger of equals that would create the industry’s leader, if the deal survives regulatory scrutiny.

Lafarge, based in France, and Holcim of Switzerland said in a statement that the complementary nature of their businesses and their “cultural proximity” provided the logic for a tie-up “that could deliver significant benefits to customers, employees and shareholders.”

They cautioned that there was ‘‘no assurance’’ a deal would be reached. A merger of companies of their size is certain to attract global antitrust concerns, particularly in Europe.

Pulling off the merger could take several years, as the companies will have to negotiate with regulators in multiple jurisdictions. Considering their global reach, Lafarge and Holcim could have to sell assets to get regulatory approval.

The cement sector has already attracted the attention of the European Commission, the European Union’s executive arm. The commission said in October that it was investigating Holcim’s takeover of the northwestern European operations of Cemex, the Mexican cement giant. And that was after it began investigating Cemex’s acquisition of Holcim in Spain.

Antoine Colombani, a spokesman for Joaquín Almunia, the European Union competition commissioner, declined to comment on the possible merger.

Both companies are world leaders in the market for cement and related products like stone, gravel and sand. Holcim last year had sales of more than 19.7 billion Swiss francs, or $22 billion. Lafarge’s full-year sales were 15.2 billion euros, or $20.8 billion.

The proposed deal is the latest in the resurging European market. Mergers and acquisitions in the region totaled almost $272 billion in the first quarter, up 53 percent from a year earlier, according to Thomson Reuters data. Telecommunications deals made up the biggest part of that, followed by industrial and health care companies.

Shares of Holcim rose 6.9 percent in late trading in Zurich, and Lafarge rose 8.9 percent in Paris. News of the talks was first reported by Bloomberg News.



The War Between Our States

Who are you at your best?

Before you read any further, take a few moments to write down a half dozen of the most salient adjectives. Don’t hold back. Give yourself credit where it’s due.

When you’ve finished, write down a series of adjectives that describe you at your worst. Don’t go easy on yourself.

So which one is the real you?

Plainly, the answer is both. The problem is that most of us don’t often feel like our best selves, and don’t much want to acknowledge our worst selves.

The quality I see mostly rarely among the many leaders I meet is real self-awareness â€" a fearless willingness to look at what motivates their behavior, and a recognition of the impact they have on those they lead, particularly when it’s destructive.

We each have a second self that arises when we’re feeling a sense of threat and, most specifically, a threat to our sense of value. Our automatic physiological response to any threat is to move into fight or flight, during which we move from rational to reactive. Our prefrontal cortex shuts down and our amygdala â€" what the neuroscientist Joseph LeDoux has called “fear central” â€" takes over. We move into survival mode, often without being aware of it.

Just think about the last time you felt you were pushed into negative emotions â€" triggered, in other words â€" by something someone did. Can you connect it to the experience of feeling devalued by the experience?

No one is immune to these threats, even the healthiest and most secure among us â€" not just because our sense of value is so precious to us, but also because it can be so easily upended. That may be especially true for leaders, who often seek external power precisely as a response to an inner feeling of powerlessness.

In the absence of self-awareness, each of us has an infinite capacity for self-deception. It is painful and embarrassing to behave badly. In defending our value, we end up using our prefrontal cortex not to better understand and take responsibility for our reactive behaviors, but rather to rationalize, minimize and blame others for them.

Power corrupts in large part because it isolates leaders from the need to face reality. I’ve seen this play out in a range of pernicious variations.

I’ve met leaders who forever trumpet their own accomplishments and even take credit for the work of others. Others need to control every decision and make it clear that they’re the smartest ones in the room. I’ve met chief executives who are relentlessly critical and rarely appreciative, unaware of the toll their comments take. Still others never say anything negative to any of their executives, avoiding conflict altogether, only to undercut them behind their backs.

Whatever the variation, the underlying explanation is most often a lack of awareness that each of these behaviors is a way of asserting value in the face of an inner experience of insecurity. The problem is that these executives are often filling their own needs at the expense of meeting the needs of those they lead.

It certainly doesn’t have to be this way. Not long ago, I was working with the senior executives at a large company. We were talking about fight or flight and survival mode. The leader of this team mentioned that he rarely let himself move into negative emotion, and that on the rare occasions when he did, he quickly moved out of it. No one contradicted him. The next day, discussing a difficult issue the team had been trying to resolve, the leader raised his hand.

“I see now that I have been in survival over this,” he said, “and that is because my value felt at risk.” It was a courageous moment, and a powerful one. A wave of relief spread visibly across the faces of the others in the room.

In effect, this leader was taking responsibility for his worst self, uncomfortable and vulnerable as that made him feel. What it gave his team was implicit permission to talk more honestly about his effect on them â€" and about their experiences of being triggered into negative emotions.

The universal fear that acknowledging our missteps will be read as weakness almost always turns out to mistaken. Far more typically, it increases trust â€" and makes us feel better about ourselves.

I know this from my own experience as a leader. When I realize that I’ve done something reactive, and potentially hurtful, to a member of my team, what I feel is shame. My first instinct is to find an excuse, or simply get away from the feeling. But when I simply own my behavior, there’s nothing left to defend.

Two things have helped me most. The first is something I call the Golden Rule of Triggers: Whatever you feel compelled to do, don’t. Instead, take a deep breath to quiet your physiology so you are in a position to make a choice about how to act, rather than simply reacting.

I’ve also found it valuable to stop thinking of myself solely as “good” or “bad” â€" and instead to accept that I’m capable of both. The family therapist Terry Real calls this “holding yourself in warm regard despite your imperfections.”

In the end, it comes back to self-awareness. The best leaders, I believe, are those who are willing to see more and exclude less.

About the Author

Tony Schwartz is the chief executive of the Energy Project and the author, most recently, of “Be Excellent at Anything: The Four Keys to Transforming the Way We Work and Live.” Twitter: @tonyschwartz



Investors Return to Anadarko After Record $5.1 Billion Settlement

Stock investors seem to have a firm grip on Anadarko Petroleum’s toxic waste settlement. The record $5.15 billion settlement on Thursday, covering years of environmental claims, was at the low end of a court-defined range, which had a midpoint of $9.8 billion. The 15 percent jump in the oil company’s market capitalization after the settlement was announced is mostly explained by those numbers. And it brings Anadarko’s 12-month stock performance nearly back in line with the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index after a bumpy ride.

The deal ends a messy legal wrangle for Anadarko and its Kerr-McGee subsidiary. The chemicals unit, acquired by Anadarko in 2006, was accused of trying to sidestep its environmental responsibilities by dumping them onto Tronox, a titanium dioxide business that was spun out of the group in 2005 and later went bankrupt. A litigation trust, set up when Tronox emerged from Chapter 11, went after Kerr-McGee for compensation.

The surge in Anadarko’s shares added $6.4 billion of market value. A bankruptcy judge in December said the company should pay something between $5.15 billion and $14.46 billion. Taking the midpoint as a guide to investor expectations, Anadarko was spared about $5 billion in penalties, accounting for much of the rally. The extra could be seen as a mark of investors’ relief that the legal uncertainty is now gone, or maybe a reflection of the fact that some may have been discounting as much as $16 billion for the settlement, as Jefferies reckons.

After Thursday’s gain, Anadarko’s shares are up 18 percent over the past 12 months. The performance is almost back in line with the broader S&P 500 Index, which has gained 22 percent over the period. One interpretation is that investors reckon that for Anadarko, which also paid $4 billion in 2011 to settle BP’s claims over the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, huge legal charges are little more than a cost of doing business.


Kevin Allison is a columnist at Reuters Breakingviews. For more independent commentary and analysis, visit breakingviews.com.



Loeb Steps Up Pressure on Sotheby’s Board

The activist investor Daniel S. Loeb fired his latest salvo at Sotheby’s on Friday, calling on shareholders to overthrow the auction house’s “lackadaisical” board.

In a letter to shareholders just a month before Sotheby’s’ annual meeting, Mr. Loeb’s hedge fund, Third Point, also appealed to shareholders to vote for its proposal for the company.

Accusing the board of lacking any “skin in the game,” Mr. Loeb told shareholders that a “dysfunctional corporate culture” had resulted in a company that is poorly managed and focused only on short-term goals.

Shares in Sotheby’s dipped 2.4 percent, to $42.78, after the letter was released.

It is the latest attack by Mr. Loeb in a battle that has pitted the billionaire hedge fund manager against the oldest publicly listed company on the New York Stock Exchange.

Last week, Mr. Loeb sued Sotheby’s to remove a poison pill that the company put in place in an effort to prevent him and any other activist investor from buying more than 10 percent of the company’s stock. Third Point called the move an “improper attempt by the directors of Sotheby’s to entrench themselves in office,” according to the complaint. Third Point has a 9.6 percent stake in Sotheby’s.

Mr. Loeb went further on Friday, accusing the board of “pulling up the drawbridge” by using a “legal relic” that revealed “that this board’s paramount interest is in ensuring its members’ status.”

Earlier this year, Mr. Loeb mounted a proxy contest against the company and called for three seats on the board. In response, the company rejected those nominees â€" which included Mr. Loeb â€" and instead announced its own candidates.

In his letter on Friday, Mr. Loeb told shareholders that they had been misled, adding that the company’s assertion that 2013 was a record year for the auction house was not entirely true. Citing a common metric for investors, Mr. Loeb said shareholders’ earnings per share were 40 percent lower in 2013 than they were in 2007, the last record year for Sotheby’s.

Under pressure from Mr. Loeb and another activist investor, Mick McGuire of Marcato Capital, Sotheby’s announced a financial review in January, promising to return $450 million to shareholders through a dividend and share buyback. It also promised to make changes to its capital cost structure, estimating $22 million in savings.

In response, Mr. Loeb said this overhaul “barely scratched the surface” and lashed back that the cost cuts were the “lowest hanging fruit available.”

In an emailed statement in response to Mr. Loeb’s letter on Friday, Sotheby’s said its board was “independent, active, engaged and focused on further increasing shareholder value.”

“In contrast,” the statement said, “we believe Mr. Loeb has made no case that change is warranted at Sotheby’s, particularly given the company’s strong results and record of value creation.”



Blackstone Said to Buy Industrial Manufacturer for $5.4 Billion

The Blackstone Group has agreed to acquire industrial manufacturer Gates Global for $5.4 billion, according to people briefed on the matter.

A deal is expected to be announced after market close on Friday.

An announced acquisition would bring to an end months of negotiations over the fate of Gates Global, which is currently owned by private equity firm Onex and the Canadian Pension Plan Investment Board.

Last month, Blackstone and TPG pursued a joint bid for Gates Global. But the people briefed on the deal said that TPG shied away from being part of a big so-called club deal, the type that typified the private equity boom before the financial crisis and often led to middling results.

Blackstone will instead work with other investment partners to do the deal, these people said, and is expected to write an equity check of about $1.6 billion, the people briefed on the deal said.

The deal will be the latest large private equity acquisition, coming on the heels of Cerberus Capital Management’s acquisition of Safeway for more than $9 billion.

Gates Global’s owners last year decided to conduct a dual track process, moving ahead with an initial public offering of the company while also putting it up for sale. CVC, another private equity firm, was also considering making a bid.

Gates Global, formerly known as Tompkins, makes everything from auto parts to oil and gas equipment, and has nearly $3 billion in revenues annually

The Wall Street Journal earlier reported that a deal was near.



Time to Reduce Repo Run Risk

Jennifer Taub is an associate professor at Vermont Law School. Her book “Other People’s Houses” (Yale University Press) will be published in May.

At a recent conference in Boston, Thomas Hoenig, the vice chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and Sheila Bair, the former chairwoman of the agency, cautioned about the systemic risk stemming from the way banks lever up through the short-term wholesale funding markets.

They are right to warn us.

The banks remain dangerously interconnected and vulnerable to sudden runs because of their dependence on short-term, often overnight borrowing through the multitrillion-dollar repurchase agreement, or repo, market.

Let’s recall. The collapse of investment banks Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers in 2008 were each precipitated by repo runs. Before it failed, Bear depended on $50 billion in overnight repo loans that it used to finance the majority of its mortgage-linked securities. A week before it collapsed, Lehman had $200 billion in overnight repo loans. Rescuing Bear through the JPMorgan purchase involved an unprecedented Fed commitment to absorb up to $29 billion in losses. And the Lehman bankruptcy kicked off a $300 billion-single-week run on money market funds and widespread panic.

Yet since then, little has been done to reduce the repo run risk for the now bigger financial firms that survived the crisis.

A repo is essentially a collateralized loan. With a repo, an investment bank in need of cash might sell $1 billion in securities (referred to as collateral) to a cash-rich entity like a money market mutual fund. At the outset, the money fund would pay the bank slightly less than $1 billion, a haircut. Under the agreement, the investment bank would buy back the securities at a specific date -- as early as the next morning. The money fund would be paid back the cash it lent plus a percentage. With matched-book repo, a dealer in one transaction acts as buyer, bringing in collateral, then sells that same collateral to a counterparty, profiting on the spread. Repo and other similar securities financing transactions such as securities lending enable banks to grow excessively large, leveraged and interconnected.

When trust is strong and cash plentiful, repos are rolled over. When trust reasonably erodes, or there is a panic, cash is demanded from the repo borrowers who might have to sell the collateral or relinquish it. This leads to fire sales by the borrower and others with similar securities and downward asset price spirals. Indeed, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York has repeatedly warned of the repo “fire sale” risk.

Particular repo reform measures proposed during the Dodd-Frank legislative process landed on the cutting room floor. This included a proposal put forward by Senator Bill Nelson, Democrat of Florida, to end the special protection for repo lenders in bankruptcy.

To reduce repo run risk, a specific statutory provision to roll back the bankruptcy safe harbors is ideal. We should not wait for its enactment, however. Dodd-Frank contains many tools the regulators can use right now.

For one, the Federal Reserve has been signaling that it plans to act like a chaperone and is focused on the partygoers who have been spiking the punch. As the New York Fed stated in an update posted on its website in February, “in the absence of a market-based solution . . . regulators may be forced to use the tools they have to take steps to reduce this risk.”

In a November speech at an event sponsored by Americans for Financial Reform, a Fed governor, Daniel K. Tarullo, provided a glimpse of a “more comprehensive set of measures” that may soon materialize in rule-making. Such an approach could include “financial actors not subject to prudential regulatory oversight,” could cover matched books and is likely to involve higher capital requirements.

Whatever route is taken, it is important that certain outcomes are achieved. Short-term repo borrowing by banks with collateral other than Treasury obligations should be substantially curtailed. And the Fed’s annual stress tests should include maturity mismatch and funding liquidity risk by including in the stress scenarios possible short-term wholesale funding runs based on the 2008 financial crisis.

Blaming the higher cost of capital, dealers are retreating and threatening to pull back more from the repo market. This could be good, because short-term repo borrowing would thus shrink or become more stable. And they are not the only game in town for cash-rich repo lenders. For example, the Fed has established a reverse repo facility with 94 money market funds.

With the Fed now deploying securities in its huge bond portfolio in these reverse repos, it may be well positioned to take away the punch bowl.



GrubHub Soars in Market Debut; Other New Listings Rise, Too

Over the last few days, GrubHub raised the price range for its initial public offering, increased the number of shares it planned to sell and, finally, priced its stock sale above expectations.

And yet investors still can’t get enough of the online food delivery service.

Shares in GrubHub opened at $40 in their market debut on Friday, rising nearly 54 percent above their I.P.O. price. That means that investors hungry for a piece of the company â€" which also owns the hugely popular Seamless site â€" pushed its valuation up to more than $3.1 billion.

Others entering the stock market for the first times beat expectations as well. IMS Health, the big prescription data vendor, began trading at $22.18 a share, up from its offering price of $20. And Opower, a software company whose services help homeowners cut their energy bills, opened at $25 a share after pricing at $19.

The warm welcome that the three received shows how much investors are continuing to embrace I.P.O.s. Potential new market entrants are certainly rushing to take advantage: Companies worldwide raised $47.2 billion in new stock sales during the first quarter, up 98 percent compared with those in the period a year earlier, according to Thomson Reuters.

The United States has proved even busier, with 64 companies raising $10.6 billion in the most active first quarter since 2000, according to data from Renaissance Capital.

If GrubHub, IMS and Opower can extend their market gains over the coming weeks, they may help erase the bad taste generated by a few prominent I.P.O.s that have since sputtered. King Digital Entertainment, the maker of the popular Candy Crush Saga game, fell below its offering price in its first day of trading and has yet to recover.

And Castlight Health, which produces health care management software, continues to fall from its dizzying high first day of trading.

Not all companies taking a bow on Friday appear poised for a warm welcome. Five9, a maker of software for cloud-based call centers, priced its offering late Thursday at $7 a share, $2 below the bottom of its expected range.



At Moelis & Co., Founder Will Have 97% of Votes

When Kenneth D. Moelis moved last month to take his investment bank public, it was clear that he would exert a considerable degree of control over the company he founded.

But the level of that control was not disclosed until Friday. Mr. Moelis, a veteran deal maker, will hold 96.6 percent of the votes in his company after it goes public, an amended prospectus showed.

That is because he will own all of the 36.3 million shares of Class B stock, which have 10 votes each. He will also own 2.3 million shares of Class A stock, or about 15.4 percent of that class, which have one vote each. Class A shares are being sold to investors in the initial public offering.

Dual-class ownership structures are prevalent among technology and media companies, including Facebook and The New York Times. Just this week, Google introduced a third share class, Class C, that is expected to help the insiders retain their control.

But the disclosure about Moelis & Company’s plans on Friday raised eyebrows among some corporate governance experts who are critical of such ownership structures.

“The whole point of the structure is to cash out and yet keep control â€" having your cake and eating it, too,” said Charles M. Elson, director of the John L. Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware. “But for the shareholders, it’s a potentially bad cake, ultimately.”

In effect, there’s not much difference between holding 51 percent of the voting power and holding almost all of it, Mr. Elson said. Still, in Mr. Moelis’s case, the high degree of control could protect his influence over time, if he ever sells stock or if more shares are issued.

At Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, the chief executive, held 57.5 percent of the voting power immediately after the I.P.O. That power has allowed him to move quickly in buying companies like WhatsApp and Oculus VR.

From one perspective, it makes sense that Mr. Moelis has an iron grip on his firm, said Jon Lukomnik, executive director of the Investor Responsibility Research Center Institute. Investment banking is a business built on relationships â€" and Mr. Moelis’s Rolodex underpins his firm’s success.

“It’s not like a major utility company where the asset is a power plant,” Mr. Lukomnik said. “You’re buying his address book and contacts and ability to do deals.”

In its prospectus, the company acknowledges how reliant it is on Mr. Moelis.

“We depend on the efforts and reputations of Mr. Moelis and our other executive officers,” the section on risk factors reads. “The loss of the services of any of them, in particular Mr. Moelis, could have a material adverse effect on our business, including our ability to attract clients.”



Three Star Deal Makers Going Separate Ways in London

LONDON - Three star deal makers in London are going their separate ways less than a year after joining forces, but are expected to continue to work together in the future.

Simon Robey, a former senior Morgan Stanley banker, and Simon Warshaw, the former co-head of investment banking at UBS, have formed their own boutique advisory firm after joining with Simon Robertson to form Robertson Robey Associates last year, according to documents filed this week with the Companies House, an agency that tracks corporate registrations.

The new company, which began operations on April 1, will operate under the name Robey Warshaw. The move had been contemplated since the bankers united last year.

Mr. Robertson, deputy chairman of HSBC and a longtime banker at Goldman Sachs, will continue to provide advisory services through his own firm, Simon Robertson Associates.

The Financial Times first reported the separation late Thursday.

Mr. Robertson, the former chairman of the Rolls-Royce Group, teamed up with Mr. Robey at the beginning of last year after he left Morgan Stanley as co-chairman of global mergers and acquisitions.

Mr. Warshaw joined the pair in the fall, less than a month after he played a lead role at UBS in Vodafone’s $130 billion deal to sell its stake in Verizon Wireless in the United States to Verizon Communications.

Their firm, Robertson Robey, recently advised Vodafone’s board of directors on its acquisition of the Spanish cable company Ono for about $10 billion.



Three Star Deal Makers Going Separate Ways in London

LONDON - Three star deal makers in London are going their separate ways less than a year after joining forces, but are expected to continue to work together in the future.

Simon Robey, a former senior Morgan Stanley banker, and Simon Warshaw, the former co-head of investment banking at UBS, have formed their own boutique advisory firm after joining with Simon Robertson to form Robertson Robey Associates last year, according to documents filed this week with the Companies House, an agency that tracks corporate registrations.

The new company, which began operations on April 1, will operate under the name Robey Warshaw. The move had been contemplated since the bankers united last year.

Mr. Robertson, deputy chairman of HSBC and a longtime banker at Goldman Sachs, will continue to provide advisory services through his own firm, Simon Robertson Associates.

The Financial Times first reported the separation late Thursday.

Mr. Robertson, the former chairman of the Rolls-Royce Group, teamed up with Mr. Robey at the beginning of last year after he left Morgan Stanley as co-chairman of global mergers and acquisitions.

Mr. Warshaw joined the pair in the fall, less than a month after he played a lead role at UBS in Vodafone’s $130 billion deal to sell its stake in Verizon Wireless in the United States to Verizon Communications.

Their firm, Robertson Robey, recently advised Vodafone’s board of directors on its acquisition of the Spanish cable company Ono for about $10 billion.



Moelis & Co. Seeks More Than $211 Million in I.P.O.

Moelis & Company, the boutique investment bank, disclosed on Friday that it hopes to raise more than $211 million in its coming initial public offering.

The firm said in a revised prospectus that it planned to price its stock sale at $26 to $29 a share. At the midpoint of that range, the advisory concern would be valued at about $1.4 billion.

Should Moelis reach that price level, the upstart boutique â€" not yet seven years old â€" would attain a valuation rivaling those of competitors nearly twice its age, like Greenhill & Company and Evercore Partners. It would fulfill a dream long held by the firm’s founder, the deal maker Kenneth D. Moelis.

So-called independent and boutique investment banks have long dotted Wall Street, but such firms have become increasingly prominent in recent years, taking business that often had gone solely to bigger rivals like Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase.

Since leaving UBS in 2007, Mr. Moelis has created an independent adviser that has been able to compete for some of the biggest deals around. For example, Moelis & Company shared credit with fellow independent firm Rothschild for organizing one of last year’s biggest mergers, the union of the advertising agencies Publicis and Omnicom.

The revised prospectus also clarified how much control Mr. Moelis will exert over the firm even after selling shares to the public. Moelis will have two classes of stock: Class A shares, carrying one vote each, that will be sold to ordinary investors, and Class B shares, which will be controlled by Mr. Moelis.

While dual-class stock structures have been in place at companies like Facebook and The New York Times Company, Mr. Moelis will enjoy an incredibly high degree of control, commanding roughly 96.6 percent of the voting power at the firm.

The Class A shares will trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “MC.”

The I.P.O. is being led by Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, with Moelis itself playing a smaller advisory role.



Moelis & Co. Seeks More Than $211 Million in I.P.O.

Moelis & Company, the boutique investment bank, disclosed on Friday that it hopes to raise more than $211 million in its coming initial public offering.

The firm said in a revised prospectus that it planned to price its stock sale at $26 to $29 a share. At the midpoint of that range, the advisory concern would be valued at about $1.4 billion.

Should Moelis reach that price level, the upstart boutique â€" not yet seven years old â€" would attain a valuation rivaling those of competitors nearly twice its age, like Greenhill & Company and Evercore Partners. It would fulfill a dream long held by the firm’s founder, the deal maker Kenneth D. Moelis.

So-called independent and boutique investment banks have long dotted Wall Street, but such firms have become increasingly prominent in recent years, taking business that often had gone solely to bigger rivals like Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase.

Since leaving UBS in 2007, Mr. Moelis has created an independent adviser that has been able to compete for some of the biggest deals around. For example, Moelis & Company shared credit with fellow independent firm Rothschild for organizing one of last year’s biggest mergers, the union of the advertising agencies Publicis and Omnicom.

The revised prospectus also clarified how much control Mr. Moelis will exert over the firm even after selling shares to the public. Moelis will have two classes of stock: Class A shares, carrying one vote each, that will be sold to ordinary investors, and Class B shares, which will be controlled by Mr. Moelis.

While dual-class stock structures have been in place at companies like Facebook and The New York Times Company, Mr. Moelis will enjoy an incredibly high degree of control, commanding roughly 96.6 percent of the voting power at the firm.

The Class A shares will trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “MC.”

The I.P.O. is being led by Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, with Moelis itself playing a smaller advisory role.



Bouygues Raises Stakes Again as Vivendi’s Board Weighs SFR Sale

LONDON - Bouygues raised the stakes again on Friday in a last-ditch effort to try to win Vivendi’s mobile phone unit away from Altice.

Vivendi’s board is expected to meet later Friday to decide whether to sell the SFR mobile phone unit to Altice, a cable and mobile service provider based in Luxembourg. SFR is France’s second-largest mobile provider behind Orange.

Last month, the board entered into a three-week exclusive negotiation period with Altice after weighing bids from both Altice and Bouygues, the owner of Bouygues Telecom, France’s third-largest mobile provider. The exclusive window expires on Friday.

On Friday, Bouygues increased the cash portion of its bid by 1.85 billion euros to 15 billion euros, or about $20.6 billion. The deal, if accepted, would significantly reshape the French telecommunications landscape by combining two of the four largest mobile providers.

On March 14, Vivendi said that Altice had offered to pay €11.75 billion and to give Vivendi a 32 percent stake in Altice’s Numericable, which would be combined with SFR. It also provided Vivendi with predetermined exit conditions, Vivendi said.

Both offers are believed to be in the neighborhood of $20 billion because of the various considerations.

Under its latest offer, Bouygues would take a 51 percent interest in a combined Bouygues Telecom-SFR, with a group of industrial and financial institutions taking a 39 percent stake in the combined company.

Vivendi would hold a 10 percent equity interest in the new company worth about €1 billion before cost cuts in the combined entity. The deal also includes an earn-out clause of €500 million, Bouygues said.

Bouygues had previously committed to pay a €500 million break-up fee if regulators refused to approve the deal or imposed conditions that made the combination untenable.

The company said Friday that it had already addressed potential antitrust concerns by divesting its mobile telephone network and a portfolio of mobile frequencies to Free, a mobile rival.

The investor group includes Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations, a Bouygues shareholder; the family of the French businessman François Pinault; JCDecaux, a minority shareholder in Bouygues Telecom; and Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund.

This is the third time that Bouygues has revised its bid since Vivendi entered negotiations with Altice on March 14.

The bidding war has pitted Martin Bouygues, the billionaire who runs the diversified industrial group that bears his name, against the French entrepreneur Patrick Drahi, who since 2002 has built Altice into a global operation with cable and cellphone assets in Europe and the Caribbean.

In one of those “it can only happen in France” moments, politicians have taken sides over who should win SFR.

Arnaud Montebourg, the minister of economy, has publicly opposed Mr. Drahi’s bid, questioning Altice’s standing as a foreign company and the amount of debt that might be used to acquire the company.

Earlier this week, Vivendi blocked an attempt by a shareholder activist group to access documents related to the sale negotiations after the group, headed by Colette Neuville, sent a bailiff to Vivendi’s offices.

All of this comes as the Autorité des Marchés Financiers, the French regulator of financial markets, has called for more transparency in the negotiations, including in disclosing potential breakup fees.

Altice, for its part, has remained relatively silent about its offer.

The sale of SFR is part of Vivendi’s plan to increase its capital reserves and to expand its existing media assets, like the pay-television provider Canal Plus. Vivendi had previously considered its own initial public offering for SFR.

The battle for SFR is the latest twist for Europe’s telecom sector.

A number of the Continent’s largest mobile, cable and fixed-line providers have begun a new round of consolidation as concerns increase that Europe’s telecom infrastructure is falling behind those of North America and Asia.

Over the last 18 months, Vodafone of Britain, Telefónica of Spain, and Liberty Global, the cable operator controlled by John C. Malone, have announced a series of deals to acquire assets in countries like Britain, Germany and Spain.

Faced with competition from upstart telecom companies, mobile operators are expanding their offerings into cable and fixed-line services to entice customers through so-called bundled deals. In response, cable companies have agreed to deals with content providers and mobile carriers to offer additional services to keep their customers.

The deals include Vodafone’s recent acquisition of the Spanish cable operator Ono for $10 billion and Liberty Global’s acquisition of the Dutch cable company Ziggo for just under $14 billion.

The deal for SFR, which has roughly 21 million wireless customers and five million broadband subscribers, is central to this consolidation, as it pits two of France’s largest telecom operators against each other, both of which need to expand their domestic presence to compete with Orange, the former national monopoly, and upstarts like Iliad.

For Bouygues, which has its own mobile operations in France, the takeover of SFR would cement its role as one of the country’s main mobile carries. For Numericable, which has cable assets in France, but no wireless business, the deal would allow the company to offer bundled cable and mobile services to prospective customers.



A Big Rush for I.P.O.s

BIG RUSH FOR I.P.O.S  |  Since 1999, the stock market has waxed and waned, but the business of initial public offerings is bustling once again, Michael J. de la Merced writes in DealBook. GrubHub, an online food-ordering company, and IMS Health, a big provider of prescription data, are just two of the latest companies hoping to seize upon investor demand for new stock offerings. At the same time, they are hoping to avoid the stumbles that have plagued a few high-profile issuers in recent weeks, including King Digital Entertainment, the maker of Candy Crush Saga.

GrubHub priced its offering on Thursday night at $26 a share, surpassing an already increased price range and raising $192.4 million for itself and investors who plan to sell. The IMS offering was priced at $20 a share, raising $1.3 billion. Companies worldwide have raised $47.2 billion in new stock sales during the first quarter, up 98 percent compared with those in the same period a year earlier. In the United States, 64 companies raised $10.6 billion in the most active first quarter since 2000.

Not all companies looking to go public â€" including the high-speed trading firm Virtu Financial â€" are feeling bold about their prospects, but investment firms nevertheless continue to see I.P.O.s as a potentially lucrative way to cash out their investments. Private equity firms in particular are choosing to take their portfolio companies public, betting that they will ultimately reap more by selling shares over time than by selling the companies outright.

OVERSEER AT SAC SELECTED  |  Bart M. Schwartz, a former federal prosecutor who has served as an independent monitor in a number of government investigations, will be Steven A. Cohen’s minder, if a federal judge approves, Matthew Goldstein writes in DealBook. Federal prosecutors and lawyers for Mr. Cohen have agreed on the selection of Mr. Schwartz to serve as the outside compliance consultant to oversee activities at Mr. Cohen’s investment firm as a condition of SAC Capital Advisors guilty plea to insider trading charges.

Prosecutors disclosed the choice of Mr. Schwartz in a sentencing memorandum filed on Thursday in support of the plea deal that authorities reached with SAC last November. On Monday, Mr. Cohen is to formally rename his firm as a family office that will manage mainly his personal fortune and will operate under the name Point72 Asset Management. As a compliance monitor, Mr. Schwartz will be expected to file a series of reports to federal prosecutors to ensure that Mr. Cohen’s new firm is correcting any deficiencies he finds with its procedures to prevent insider trading.

CITI’S S.O.S.  |  Eugene M. McQuade, one of Citigroup’s stalwarts who last month had announced plans to retire as chief executive of Citibank, will lead the bank’s preparations for the stress test over the next year, Michael Corkery writes in DealBook. The move is meant to help the bank regain the confidence of the Federal Reserve, which last week rejected Citigroup’s capital plan, embarrassing the bank and raising questions about the reliability of its financial projections.

The Fed’s rebuke was “a call to action for our firm,” Michael L. Corbat, Citigroup’s chief executive, wrote in a memo to employees. “Gene is fully empowered to do whatever is necessary, and I will devote any resource required, to ensure our next capital plan is not objected to,” he said in the memo.

HAPPY JOBS DAY  |  After weak readings for December and January, and then a slightly better report for February, experts expect to see a more robust picture for March in the employment data, which is set to be released by the Labor Department at 8:30 a.m. on Friday. The consensus among economists polled by Bloomberg calls for an addition of 200,000 jobs to payrolls in March, up from a gain of 175,000 in February, with the unemployment rate falling by 0.1 percentage point to 6.6 percent.

ON THE AGENDA  |  In addition to the jobs report, Thomas E. Perez, the labor secretary, is on Bloomberg TV at 9:30 a.m. Mike Judge, the creator of the new HBO show “Silicon Valley,” is on Bloomberg TV at 1 p.m. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel is on Bloomberg TV at 2 p.m. Matt Maloney, the chief executive of GrubHub, is on CNBC at 9 a.m.

MOZILLA CHIEF STEPS DOWN  |  Just two weeks after taking the job, Brendan Eich, who has developed some of the web’s most important technologies, resigned on Thursday as the chief executive of Mozilla following an intense debate over his belief that gays should not be allowed to marry, Nick Bilton and Noam Cohen write in the Bits blog. Mr. Eich came under heavy fire from employees and the public for making a $1,000 contribution in 2008 to support a ban on gay marriage in California under Proposition 8.

“Mr. Eich’s departure from the small but influential Mountain View, Calif., company, which makes the popular Firefox web browser, highlights the growing potency of gay-rights advocates in an area that, just a decade ago, seemed all but walled off to their influence: the boardrooms of major corporations,” Mr. Bilton and Mr. Cohen write, adding, “But it is likely to intensify a debate about the role of personal beliefs in the business world and raise questions about the tolerance for conservative views inside a technology industry long dominated by progressive and libertarian voices.”

Mergers & Acquisitions »

Liberty Media Will Sell Most of Its Investment In Barnes & NobleLiberty Media Will Sell Most of Its Investment In Barnes & Noble  |  The loss of a major shareholder is the latest setback for Barnes & Noble, which has closed dozens of stores and has trouble fulfilling its digital ambitions. After Liberty’s announcement, Barnes & Noble’s stock dropped sharply, and by the end of the day was down 13.5 percent.
DealBook »

Mylan Considers Bid for Swedish Pharmaceuticals Rival  |  The companies have had early discussions about a possible transaction, according to people familiar with the matter.
DealBook »

Bidding War for Mobile Carrier Tests France’s Free MarketBidding War for Mobile Carrier Tests France’s Free Market  |  Two billionaires are vying to acquire SFR, the country’s second-largest cellphone player, in a battle that exemplifies France’s struggle to decide how much market competition it wants.
DealBook »

Nest Labs Stops Selling Its Smoke Detector  |  Nest Labs, the home automation company recently acquired by Google for $3.2 billion, said on Thursday that it was halting sales of its smoke and carbon monoxide detector over safety concerns, The New York Times writes.
NEW YORK TIMES

Boeing Said to Be Exploring Purchase of Mercury Systems  |  Boeing is said to be considering buying Mercury Systems, a supplier of digital signal and image processing systems to the aerospace and defense industry, Reuters reports, citing unidentified people familiar with the situation. Mercury has a market value of about $440 million.
REUTERS

INVESTMENT BANKING »

Pimco’s Gross, Facing Skeptical Investors, Discusses His Dead CatPimco’s Gross, Facing Skeptical Investors, Discusses His Dead Cat  |  William H. Gross, the founder of the giant asset manager Pimco, devoted considerable space in his investment outlook letter on Thursday to a eulogy for his cat of 14 years.
DealBook »

R.B.S. Names Credit Suisse Banker as Finance Chief  |  Ewen Stevenson, who advised the British government when it bailed out R.B.S. and Lloyds Banking Group during the financial crisis, will join the Scottish bank on May 19.
DealBook »

A Vacant Chair for Blythe MastersA Vacant Chair for Blythe Masters  |  The JPMorgan executive’s exit from the bank could solve a longstanding search for a chairman of Glencore, the giant Swiss trading house, Christopher Hughes writes in Reuters Breakingviews.
Reuters Breakingviews »

JPMorgan Restructures Investment Unit  |  JPMorgan Chase has restructured its chief investment office, the former home of the “London whale,” The Financial Times writes, citing unidentified people familiar with the situation.
FINANCIAL TIMES

A New Look at Big-Bank Subsidies  |  A new report shows that the huge implicit government subsides to big banks encourage dangerous risk-taking on a scale that can damage the macroeconomy, Simon Johnson, an economist, writes in the Economix blog.
NEW YORK TIMES ECONOMIX

PRIVATE EQUITY »

Ares Management Gains Control of Guitar Center  |  Ares Management took a controlling stake in the musical instrument retailer Guitar Center, The Wall Street Journal reports. Bain Capital, Guitar Center’s former owner, retained partial ownership of the company, along with representation on the board.
WALL STREET JOURNAL

Foreign Funds Said to Bid for Spanish Olive Oil Firm Deoleo  |  A number of foreign firms, including the American private equity firms Carlyle Group and Rhone Capital, are said to have submitted takeover offers for Spain’s Deoleo, the worlds’ top olive oil bottler, Reuters reports, citing an unidentified person familiar with the situation.
REUTERS

Schneider in Talks with Carlyle and PAI Partners to Sell Sensors Unit  |  The French electrical gear maker Schneider Electric said it was in exclusive talks with the private equity firms Carlyle Group and PAI Partners to sell its sensors business in a deal based on an enterprise value of $900 million, Reuters writes.
REUTERS

HEDGE FUNDS »

Citrone’s Hedge Funds Struggled in March  |  The billionaire Robert Citrone’s two main hedge funds fell by about 10 percent in March, a swift reversal for Mr. Citrone, who was one of the top-performing hedge fund managers last year, Forbes reports.
FORBES

Discovery Capital Management Flagship Fund Said to Have Lost 9.3% in March  |  The hedge fund Discovery Capital Management is said to have lost 9.3 percent in its flagship fund in March, The Wall Street Journal writes, citing unidentified people familiar with the situation. The March figures drove the $15 billion firm’s 7.1 percent loss in the first quarter.
WALL STREET JOURNAL

I.P.O./OFFERINGS »

Energy-Saving Company Set for Public Offering  |  The company, Opower, hopes to raise more than $100 million through a stock sale that could leave it with a value close to $1 billion, The New York Times writes.
NEW YORK TIMES

Chinese I.P.O. Drought in New York Ends With Rally  |  Tarena International, the first Chinese company to debut in New York this year, rallied as investors bet the provider of education services would benefit from economic growth that was the fastest in Asia, Bloomberg News writes. Tarena’s initial public offering was the first of eight Chinese offerings planned for this year.
BLOOMBERG NEWS

Dropbox Promotes Insider to Financial Chief Ahead of I.P.O.  |  The online storage company Dropbox promoted Sujay Jaswa to chief financial officer, a key role ahead of the company’s planned initial public offering, The Wall Street Journal writes.
WALL STREET JOURNAL

VENTURE CAPITAL »

Image-Sharing Site Imgur Raises $40 Million From Andreessen Horowitz  |  In business since 2009, Imgur had not accepted any venture capital money and had become profitable by employing a small team and working with advertisers. It decided to change its strategy so it could move faster, the Bits blog writes.
NEW YORK TIMES BITS

Alibaba’s Jack Ma Invests $532 Million in Financial Software Firm  |  Jack Ma, the founder of the Alibaba Group, China’s Internet giant, will pay $532 million to take a controlling share of the financial software firm Hundsun Technologies, Reuters writes.
REUTERS

‘Silicon Valley’ to Debut on HBO  |  In Mike Judge’s wry study of start-up culture, “Silicon Valley,” the process of discovering the next big thing is authentically dull, Farhad Manjoo writes in The New York Times.
NEW YORK TIMES

Tech Start-Ups Are Targets of Ransom Cyberattacks  |  Several web companies have recently been hit with attacks that can knock them offline using a flood of traffic unless the pay ransoms in Bitcoins, the Bits blog reports.
NEW YORK TIMES BITS

LEGAL/REGULATORY »

U.S. Ordered to Return Assets Seized in Crackdown of Luxury Cars Exported to ChinaU.S. Ordered to Return Assets Seized in Crackdown of Luxury Cars Exported to China  |  A ruling by an Ohio judge was a blow to a federal investigation of the business of buying luxury cars for a quick resale in China at a high markup.
DealBook »

Jeremy Stein to Resign From Fed Board to Return to Harvard  |  Jeremy Stein, a member of the Federal Reserve’s board who has raised concerns about its stimulus campaign, will resign at the end of May and return to his previous role at Harvard, The New York Times writes.
NEW YORK TIMES

MF Global Customers to Be Paid Back in Full  |  More than two years after the collapse of the brokerage firm, James W. Giddens, the court-appointed trustee overseeing the return of customer money, announced that he was sending a final round of checks to make MF Global’s customers whole.
DealBook »

Brookstone Files for Bankruptcy and Plans to Sell ItselfBrookstone Files for Bankruptcy and Plans to Sell Itself  |  The company hopes that a $147 million combination with Spencer Spirit Holdings will provide a path toward profitability. The company would continue to operate its stores, catalog and website under the Brookstone brand.
DealBook »

Anadarko Pays Billions in Settling Toxins Case  |  Anadarko Petroleum, a giant Texas oil company, has agreed to pay $5.1 billion for a vast environmental cleanup, a sum the Justice Department said was the largest it had ever won in such a case, The New York Times reports.
NEW YORK TIMES

European Central Bank Hints at Bond-Buying Program  |  The bank left its benchmark rate at 0.25 percent, but its president, Mario Draghi, said the policy council had discussed quantitative easing, The New York Times writes.
NEW YORK TIMES

Switching Names to Save on Taxes  |  Caterpillar ducked billions of dollars in United States income taxes with a simple strategy. Whether it was legal is open to debate, Floyd Norris writes in the High & Low Finance column.
NEW YORK TIMES