Total Pageviews

Jack Ma to Join Tech Moguls in Backing Medical Research Prize

Yuri Milner, the Russian entrepreneur and investor, attracted some of Silicon Valley’s biggest names to join him in starting a life sciences prize this year. Now, he has wooed a titan from China: Jack Ma.

Mr. Ma, the executive chairman of the Internet giant Alibaba, and his wife, Cathy Zhang, have agreed to become sponsors of the prize, which is the world’s richest for medicine and biology, the group is expected to announce on Friday. Mr. Ma is also joining the board of the foundation that administers the prize, called the Breakthrough Prize in Life Sciences.

Flush with Internet money, the foundation offers $3 million awards to scientists, more than twice as much as the Nobel Prize. Mr. Ma’s contribution brings the number of annual prizes to six from five.

Mr. Milner, who studied physics before earning a fortune investing in companies like Facebook, said the addition of Mr. Ma underscored the global nature of the prize. Though most of the recipients this year were American, the prize is open to submissions from around the world.

“Scientists are not making anywhere near what they should be making given the significance of what they’re doing,” Mr. Milner said in an interview. “In the last 50 years, we have evolved from a world where Einstein was the biggest celebrity to a world where the most famous scientist is not in the top few hundred celebrities in the world.”

A celebrity in his own right, Mr. Ma is joining a group of prominent technology moguls at the foundation. In addition to Mr. Milner, the sponsors of the prize include Sergey Brin, a co-founder of Google; Anne Wojcicki, a co-founder of the genetics company 23andMe who is Mr. Brin’s wife; Mark Zuckerberg, the chief executive of Facebook; and Priscilla Chan, Mr. Zuckerberg’s wife. Arthur D. Levinson, the chairman of Apple, is the foundation’s chairman.

Mr. Ma, a former English teacher from Hangzhou, founded Alibaba in 1999 as a platform for businesses to trade products like circuit breakers and hydraulic cylinders. Now a giant in online commerce, the company is moving toward an initial public offering that could value it at more than $75 billion.

One of the beneficiaries of the I.P.O. will most likely be Mr. Milner, whose firm, DST Global, invested in Alibaba in 2011. But Mr. Milner first met Mr. Ma several years before that, he said, on a trip to China to learn more about the country’s technology industry.

“It is my honor to be able to contribute to innovation in the field of medical research,” Mr. Ma said in a statement. “I hope that this can one day help make a difference in the lives of many.”

The life sciences foundation awarded its prizes this year to 11 scientists, many of whom had done work in the genetics of cell growth and how it can produce cancer. The foundation says it rewards research aimed at finding cures for serious diseases, with one prize reserved for work on Parkinson’s disease.

The period for submitting online nominations for next year’s prize began this month and continues through Oct. 2. Anyone can submit a nomination on the foundation’s Web site.

For Mr. Milner, the prize has a personal dimension. His father died this year after a battle with colon cancer, he said.

“There was no technology in the world he could use to get cured,” Mr. Milner said.



JPMorgan Urged to Pay More in Mortgage Deal

The Justice Department is moving closer to striking a multibillion-dollar settlement with JPMorgan Chase over questionable mortgage practices, after authorities urged the bank to raise its offer and the bank’s chief executive took the rare step of meeting with Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. in Washington to discuss the deal.

Mr. Holder’s nearly hourlong meeting on Thursday with the chief executive, Jamie Dimon, followed days of intense negotiations during which JPMorgan ultimately offered to pay a roughly $7 billion fine and provide $4 billion in relief for struggling homeowners, according to people briefed on the talks. While the Justice Department has largely agreed to the $4 billion in relief, which requires the bank to reduce the size of certain mortgages and refinance others, it seeks more than the proposed $7 billion in penalties and is now waiting for JPMorgan to prepare a new, larger settlement offer, the people said.

The latest push on the size of the penalties indicates that the talks are entering their final stages. After JPMorgan raised its total offer to $11 billion earlier in the week, the disparity in negotiating positions narrowed significantly.

And the size of the fine is not the central negotiating point for the bank: JPMorgan is instead focused on using the wide-ranging pact to resolve many of the mortgage-related investigations it faces. Most important, the bank is asking that prosecutors in California drop a criminal investigation into the bank’s mortgage practices â€" a request that the Justice Department has yet to meet.

Despite the progress, the people briefed on the talks cautioned that the terms were shifting and that the discussions could still fall apart. The people spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss private negotiations.

If the settlement talks proceed on the current course, the people said, the deal would most likely resolve all federal investigations into whether JPMorgan duped investors into purchasing mortgage securities from 2005 to 2007 â€" the height of the housing bubble. The deal would not prevent the government from suing over mortgage securities originated in 2008 and beyond, after the housing market crashed.

Under the current contours of the settlement, the Justice Department will also not include an investigation from the United States attorney’s office in Manhattan. The bank, the people said, is in advanced stages of negotiating that deal, which involves violations of the rules of the Federal Housing Administration’s mortgage insurance program.

The Justice Department’s potential settlement pact, however, would be likely to resolve a 2011 lawsuit from another housing agency. The deal would require JPMorgan to pay from $3 billion to $6 billion to settle with the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which accused JPMorgan of selling shoddy loans to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-controlled housing organizations, the people briefed on the talks said. That case was one of the largest threats to JPMorgan.

The Justice Department’s settlement deal, if approved, is also likely to force JPMorgan to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to settle a lawsuit filed by Eric T. Schneiderman, the New York attorney general, and close an investigation from prosecutors in Pennsylvania. Both cases involve mortgages that the bank inherited from firms it bought in 2008; Mr. Schneiderman’s case involves Bear Stearns, and the Pennsylvania investigation is focused on Washington Mutual.

Another front in the settlement talks, and a significant worry for the bank, is a lawsuit that federal prosecutors in California have readied against JPMorgan over mortgage securities it sold to investors in the run-up to the housing crash. The prosecutors, from the United States attorney’s office for the Eastern District of California, are also conducting a parallel criminal investigation. Although it is unclear whether the bank will be charged, the criminal investigation continues to focus on JPMorgan employees involved in the mortgage deals.

JPMorgan declined to comment, as did a Justice Department spokeswoman.

The mortgage talks, which represent only a sliver of JPMorgan’s legal woes, coincide with the bank’s broader effort to resolve these problems and mend frayed relationships in Washington. JPMorgan faces investigations from at least seven federal agencies, several state regulators and two foreign governments.

As the investigations linger, the bank incurs significant legal costs. Bracing against potentially hefty payouts to the authorities, JPMorgan recorded a $678 million expense for additional litigation reserves in the second quarter, up from $323 million in the same period a year ago, according to a filing in August.

In its filing, JPMorgan estimated it could incur as much as $6.8 billion in losses beyond its reserves. That figure is up nearly $1 billion from the first quarter of the year. One possible silver lining, however, is that the fines and penalties could be tax deductible.

The inquiries run the gamut of the bank.

The Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating the bank’s decision to hire the children of Chinese officials, and whether those hires violated federal bribery laws. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is examining the bank’s debt collection practices. And federal prosecutors in Manhattan are scrutinizing whether the bank failed to sound alarms about Bernard L. Madoff’s Ponzi scheme.

Last week, JPMorgan began to clear one of the largest legal clouds hanging over the bank. The bank agreed to pay $920 million to four regulatory agencies investigating the bank’s multibillion-dollar trading loss in London last year. The agencies â€" the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Reserve and the Financial Conduct Authority in London â€" cited the bank for “severe breakdowns” in internal controls surroundingthe losses. (That same day, JPMorgan agreed to pay $80 million to regulators over accusations that it charged credit card customers for identity-theft products they never received.)

In the mortgage case, settlement talks heated up this week after news reports on Monday indicated that the federal prosecutors in California were poised to sue the bank. That day, people briefed on the matter said, Mr. Dimon reached out to Mr. Holder’s office and floated the idea of an in-person meeting.

The lawsuit from California apparently frozen, that meeting was convened on Thursday morning in Mr. Holder’s fifth-floor conference room. Two of Mr. Holder’s top lieutenants â€" James M. Cole and Tony West â€" also attended the meeting.

Mr. Dimon had his own entourage: Stephen M. Cutler, the bank’s general counsel; Stacey R. Friedman, another senior attorney; and Matthew E. Zames, the bank’s chief operating officer.

While it is common for chief executives to meet with Justice Department officials, it is rare that they meet directly with Mr. Holder. When the chairman of UBS, for example, visited the Justice Department last year to discuss its plans to extract a guilty plea from the bank’s Japanese unit, he met with an assistant attorney general and staff lawyers.

At a news conference on Thursday, Mr. Holder declined to discuss the details of the meeting.

“I will say that I did meet with representatives from JPMorgan Chase,” Mr. Holder said. “That is an ongoing matter.”



S.E.C. Sues Former Chairman in Looting of Educational Company

The Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday accused the former chief executive and chairman of an American-listed Chinese education company of stealing $41 million from investors.

The ChinaCast Education Corporation, a company that provided postsecondary education services in China, began operating in the United States in December 2006 and later listed on the Nasdaq. It was a time when American investors were hungry to get a piece of China’s growth by investing in a flurry of Chinese companies listing on United States exchanges.

But in recent years, such companies have been the target of growing scrutiny as investors have lost billions of dollars. According to the latest complaint filed in federal court in Manhattan, ChinaCast’s former chairman and chief executive, Chan Tze Ngon, illegally transferred money from the company. The indictment also accuses Jiang Xiangyuan, a former president of ChinaCast’s China operations, of selling shares based on insider information.

Both men live in China, and it is unclear how they will answer the accusations. The S.E.C. has sued both men in civil court and is seeking disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and penalties.

It is the latest in a story that spans thousands of miles with a cast of hired muscle men, stolen corporate bank account details, and a bitter boardroom battle in which Mr. Chan was eventually ousted.

The company at one point was worth more than $200 million before any allegations of fraud were made. After Mr. Chan and Mr. Jiang left the company, it was worth just $5 million, the S.E.C. said.

“The massive fraud perpetrated by Chan destroyed hundreds of millions of dollars in market value, and Jiang’s brazen insider trading allowed him to profit by dumping his own shares on the market before the fraud was exposed,” said Andrew M. Calamari, head of the agency’s New York office.

The company’s descent began late in 2011, when ChinaCast, under Mr. Chan’s leadership, accused Ned L. Sherwood, a director and one of the company’s biggest shareholders, of insider trading.

Mr. Sherwood denied the claims and mounted his own proxy campaign to bring three new directors to the board. He filed a complaint to a Delaware court, asserting that an “unidentified attendee” had taken over a critical board meeting, disqualifying Mr. Sherwood and his nominees. Eventually Mr. Sherwood was successful in bringing two new members onto the board and Mr. Chan was ousted in March 2012.

What came after confounded investors. In April 2012, a dozen men claiming to be associated with Mr. Chan stormed the company’s Shanghai office and violently removed computers from the company’s finance department, according to a regulatory filing in the United States. The company’s chops â€" official seals necessary to obtain bank account records in China â€" also disappeared, making it difficult for new management to go through the financial books.

The S.E.C.’s complaint on Thursday included accusations of a long list of misdeeds, potentially shining some light on the company’s real business since its debut on the Nasdaq in 2007.

“Chan orchestrated the systematic looting of ChinaCast,” said Sanjay Wadhwa, a director for enforcement in the S.E.C.’s New York office, “and hid his misconduct by repeatedly lying to investors about the company’s assets until he lost control of the board and was terminated.”

According to the complaint, Mr. Chan stole $41 million from a total of $43.8 million that ChinaCast had raised from investors. He is accused of then transferring the money into ChinaCast Technology, a subsidiary that Mr. Chan falsely claimed was controlled by ChinaCast. Instead, Mr. Chan personally owned a 50 percent stake, while ChinaCast had a 49.5 percent stake.

Mr. Chan also pledged $30.4 million of the company’s cash deposits to secure debts for unrelated entities, failing to notify shareholders or the board. During this time he signed reports that falsely claimed the company’s cash and equivalents were unburdened. “In hindsight, this certainly shows why Mr. Chan may have been so anxious to get rid of our client, Ned Sherwood,” said Barry R. Goldsmith, a partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher.

The company was forced to delist from the Nasdaq after it failed to file its 2011 annual report.

Mr. Chan and Mr. Jiang were not immediately available for comment.



S.E.C. Sues Former Chairman in Looting of Educational Company

The Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday accused the former chief executive and chairman of an American-listed Chinese education company of stealing $41 million from investors.

The ChinaCast Education Corporation, a company that provided postsecondary education services in China, began operating in the United States in December 2006 and later listed on the Nasdaq. It was a time when American investors were hungry to get a piece of China’s growth by investing in a flurry of Chinese companies listing on United States exchanges.

But in recent years, such companies have been the target of growing scrutiny as investors have lost billions of dollars. According to the latest complaint filed in federal court in Manhattan, ChinaCast’s former chairman and chief executive, Chan Tze Ngon, illegally transferred money from the company. The indictment also accuses Jiang Xiangyuan, a former president of ChinaCast’s China operations, of selling shares based on insider information.

Both men live in China, and it is unclear how they will answer the accusations. The S.E.C. has sued both men in civil court and is seeking disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and penalties.

It is the latest in a story that spans thousands of miles with a cast of hired muscle men, stolen corporate bank account details, and a bitter boardroom battle in which Mr. Chan was eventually ousted.

The company at one point was worth more than $200 million before any allegations of fraud were made. After Mr. Chan and Mr. Jiang left the company, it was worth just $5 million, the S.E.C. said.

“The massive fraud perpetrated by Chan destroyed hundreds of millions of dollars in market value, and Jiang’s brazen insider trading allowed him to profit by dumping his own shares on the market before the fraud was exposed,” said Andrew M. Calamari, head of the agency’s New York office.

The company’s descent began late in 2011, when ChinaCast, under Mr. Chan’s leadership, accused Ned L. Sherwood, a director and one of the company’s biggest shareholders, of insider trading.

Mr. Sherwood denied the claims and mounted his own proxy campaign to bring three new directors to the board. He filed a complaint to a Delaware court, asserting that an “unidentified attendee” had taken over a critical board meeting, disqualifying Mr. Sherwood and his nominees. Eventually Mr. Sherwood was successful in bringing two new members onto the board and Mr. Chan was ousted in March 2012.

What came after confounded investors. In April 2012, a dozen men claiming to be associated with Mr. Chan stormed the company’s Shanghai office and violently removed computers from the company’s finance department, according to a regulatory filing in the United States. The company’s chops â€" official seals necessary to obtain bank account records in China â€" also disappeared, making it difficult for new management to go through the financial books.

The S.E.C.’s complaint on Thursday included accusations of a long list of misdeeds, potentially shining some light on the company’s real business since its debut on the Nasdaq in 2007.

“Chan orchestrated the systematic looting of ChinaCast,” said Sanjay Wadhwa, a director for enforcement in the S.E.C.’s New York office, “and hid his misconduct by repeatedly lying to investors about the company’s assets until he lost control of the board and was terminated.”

According to the complaint, Mr. Chan stole $41 million from a total of $43.8 million that ChinaCast had raised from investors. He is accused of then transferring the money into ChinaCast Technology, a subsidiary that Mr. Chan falsely claimed was controlled by ChinaCast. Instead, Mr. Chan personally owned a 50 percent stake, while ChinaCast had a 49.5 percent stake.

Mr. Chan also pledged $30.4 million of the company’s cash deposits to secure debts for unrelated entities, failing to notify shareholders or the board. During this time he signed reports that falsely claimed the company’s cash and equivalents were unburdened. “In hindsight, this certainly shows why Mr. Chan may have been so anxious to get rid of our client, Ned Sherwood,” said Barry R. Goldsmith, a partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher.

The company was forced to delist from the Nasdaq after it failed to file its 2011 annual report.

Mr. Chan and Mr. Jiang were not immediately available for comment.



A Promising Start at Air Products

Activist investor William A. Ackman has quickly dislodged Air Products and Chemicals’ underperforming boss, John McGlade. The win brought him a sharp gain of $100 million on his 10 percent holding in the natural gas firm as investors initially reacted to the news.

For bigger, more lasting success, however, a painstaking transformation of the company is now needed.



In This Battle Arena, Warriors Are Armed With Algorithms

Michael Chang, 30 years old, is the sort of guy that BattleFin, a recruitment firm searching for hedge fund talent, wants to attract.

Six years ago, at a Foxconn plant in Guangdong, China, Mr. Chang used data analysis to figure out that the unusually cold weather outside had led to a high failure rate of the computer chips on the factory floor. The finding saved the company from significant revenue losses.

Today, he runs a hedge fund in Cambridge, Mass., that analyzes not only weather, but news and shipping reports, to make investment decisions.

To find more math whizzes who can apply their knowledge of other fields to the financial world, BattleFin’s co-founders, Tim Harrington and Brian Tomeo, have created a start-up that they hope will grow into an incubator that organizes finance tournaments and provides capital to “give the little guys a chance.”

“By creating a tournament, we’re able to find these guys who are not on the radar screen of the larger seeders,” Mr. Tomeo said.

Hedge funds have long sought out super brains who could apply mathematical concepts to financial markets. The “quant” approach was made famous in the 1970s by Robert C. Merton, Fischer Black and Myron S. Scholes. Their Black-Scholes model, which predicts the future value of stocks and bonds, spawned the growth of hedge funds.

But the models were far from perfect. In 1998, the hedge fund Long-Term Capital Management failed to factor in the possibility of a Russian government debt default, and when its highly leveraged bets soured, the firm nearly brought the global credit market to the brink. Again in August 2007, hedge funds that relied heavily on quant models â€" AQR Capital Management, D. E. Shaw and Renaissance Technologies among them â€" suffered huge losses in one week as the housing market began to collapse. Because their models were so similar and the firms had such big positions, their losses were amplified.

Mr. Harrington, 37, whose career includes working at JPMorgan Ventures and Sigma Capital, and Mr. Tomeo, 41, who worked at JPMorgan for 13 years, want to find data scientists who can build models that predict these types of swings.

To pay for their tournaments, now in their second year, they find investors on the lookout for new talent. The prize money is determined by how much someone is willing to invest. BattleFin, which has offices in New York and Miami, then takes a recruitment fee of $5,000 to $15,000.

In the latest BattleFin competition, called the Big Data Combine, 382 teams from 43 countries have been given a data set of stock market prices with some closing prices missing. Using this and a series of external “clues” â€" news that could affect stock price movements â€" the players build a predictive model.

For many of the contestants, finance was not on the radar. To find them, BattleFin teamed up with Kaggle, a Web community of number crunchers hungry for data sets and up for a challenge, and RavenPack, a provider of sophisticated market data.

Corey Chivers, a Ph.D. candidate in computational ecology at McGill University in Montreal, is one contestant. In his academic work, he is trying to predict the growth pattern of invasive species. In his spare time, Mr. Chivers likes to enter data competitions much as other people like to do crossword puzzles.

“I’m easily distracted by any data program,” Mr. Chivers said.

The fact that some contestants have no background or interest in finance does not faze BattleFin’s co-founders.

“What we’re trying to do is figure out which people we can work with to make very interesting predictions with large data sets,” Mr. Tomeo said.

On Oct. 25, 12 finalists will be flown to Miami for a showdown, where Matt Iseman, the host of the NBC show “American Ninja Warrior,” will be the M.C. of the event. The top five finishers will split $10,000. The first-place finisher will get half of that, $5,000, and the opportunity to turn the winning predictive model into a strategy using sophisticated testing software. If the strategy is successful, BattleFin will help license the strategy to a hedge fund.

BattleFin’s approach has already met with some success.

Mr. Chang, the former Foxconn factory manager, for example, won the first BattleFin hedge fund contest. He ended up at M.I.T. after Foxconn sponsored his Ph.D. in electrical engineering there as a reward for his work. Mr. Chang said his interest quickly turned to finance. “The finance world has the strongest hunger for data and information,” he said.

He now manages more than $5 million through Flyberry Capital, a hedge fund he co-founded with a fellow M.I.T. student, Zeid Barakat.

Mark Angil, 48, is a more recent BattleFin winner. He started his career as a nuclear propulsion officer in the Navy and, through a career sidestep, ended up in Silicon Valley during the heady days of the technology boom.

“The golden ’90s in Silicon Valley was insane,” Mr. Angil said. “It was hard not to get bit by the market bug.”

Mr. Angil set up a hedge fund called RBD Adaptive in 2009, to manage money from friends and family. After gaining some publicity through the BattleFin tournament, he has attracted money from new investors. He now manages around $2.7 million, he said.

Mr. Chang and Mr. Angil manage less money, of course, than what many hedge fund titans make in fees in one year. But they see it as a start at a time when finding capital has become harder for fledgling hedge fund managers. Heavyweights like Bridgewater Associates, which manages $150 billion in client money, are becoming bigger while the smaller guys are being squeezed by the high costs of legal compliance.

Patrick Wolff, 45, knows the hurdles well. After working for Peter Thiel’s Clarium Capital for five and a half years, Mr. Wolff, a former chess grandmaster, struck out on his own. Mr. Wolff started Grandmaster Capital with $50 million in seed capital from Mr. Thiel three years ago. It has grown to $200 million today.

“I think you can launch a fund of our size and bootstrap it,” he said. But, he added, “compared to the last decade, there is a sense that it’s less of the go-go years and more in the nose-to-the-grindstone years.”

Still, even the big hedge funds have a difficult time finding talent.

“Everyone is trying to figure this out and make it more analytical,” said Darcy Bradbury, a managing director at D.E. Shaw.

The company sponsors a handful of competitions, including M.I.T.’s annual Battlecode competition for undergraduates and a robotics competition at one of New York’s most prestigious public schools, Stuyvesant High.

“We like to cast the net wide and in areas where people may not think about finance,” said Aaron Kirchner, D.E. Shaw’s director of recruitment.

But if talented people are not scooped up by a big firm, they face an uphill battle. BattleFin’s tournaments have helped raise the profile of hedge fund hopefuls, but they do not address the biggest hurdle of finding capital.

“It shouldn’t be hard, but it has become more a world of haves and have-nots,” said Scott Roth, who shut down his $350 million hedge fund Severn River Capital Management this year after a few years of lackluster performance. “It’s harder for the guys that start up in this environment.”

He added that it might end up being “just the traditional players that can do this kind of thing.”



Detroit Manager Seeks to Freeze Pension Plan

Detroit’s emergency manager wants to freeze the city’s pension system for public workers, in light of mounting evidence it was operated in an unsound manner for many years, contributing to the city’s financial downfall.

The emergency manager, Kevyn Orr, issued on Thursday the preliminary results of a three-month investigation that identified diversions of shared money into individual accounts, real estate investments that lost millions of dollars and “disconcerting administrative protocols” for handling health care and other benefits.

Unfunded pensions and health care are by far the biggest claims in Detroit’s big municipal bankruptcy. Mr. Orr said that the purpose of the investigation, still in progress, was “to help identify how the city can address its present financial crisis and, going forward, help determine the basis for and what, if any, actions that must be taken.”

In a letter sent with their report, the auditor general and inspector general, Mark Lockridge and James Heath, said they focused on real estate investments first because federal law enforcement agents have already been looking at allegations of fraud in that area. They said they plan to look at other types of investments later.

Details of the pension freeze were outlined separately in a memo provided by Tina Bassett, a spokeswoman for the trustees of Detroit’s General Retirement System. The memo said that the city’s current defined-benefit pension plan would be closed to new members as of Dec. 31. Further benefit accruals would be halted on that date for city workers already vested in the pension plan, but they would keep the pensions that they had earned up until then.

That type of pension freeze is legal and fairly common in the private sector. But public employees’ unions in many states say it would be illegal for their members, because of statutes and constitutional provisions that apply to governmental workers.

The Detroit pension freeze would also halt payments of other nonpension benefits that have been made for many years, including distributions to active workers. Retirees would no longer receive yearly cost-of-living adjustments. Current city workers would be shifted into new defined-contribution plans, similar to 401(k) plans, which would comply with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, according to the memo.

The city’s current approach, in which money is diverted from a pooled pension trust fund to a system of individual accounts, appears not to comply, risking the pension system’s tax-qualified status. Pension funds are rarely stripped of their qualified status by the Internal Revenue Service because the result is so harsh for the participants. All the contributions and investment earnings of the plan in such a case would immediately become taxable, a catastrophic event.

Ms. Bassett said the trustees did not support the proposed pension freeze and saw it as a sign of bad faith on the part of the city and the law firm that is advising it in its municipal bankruptcy case, Jones Day.

“No one from the G.R.S. had any input into this proposal,” she said in a written statement. “We believe it is unseemly and disingenuous to present a proposal involving a new benefit structure that will affect the pensions of our members, beneficiaries and city employees not yet vested, without seeking our input, suggestions, knowledge and expertise.”

The statement suggested that city unions will include the pension proposal at an important bankruptcy hearing in October, where they plan to argue that the city is not qualified for bankruptcy court protection because it did not first make good-faith efforts to resolve its problems in negotiations.



Chrysler’s Owners Race for the Cliff

Chrysler’s Owners Race for the Cliff

What do you call the man who is trying to sabotage Chrysler’s initial public offering by threatening to harm the company, perhaps fatally, if the offering is completed?

You call him Chrysler’s chief executive.

There has never been a proposed I.P.O. like Chrysler’s.

How is it different?

First, the preliminary prospectus filed by the company this week has only one underwriter listed, JPMorgan Chase. A typical offering by a large company will have at least a few underwriters. Every investment bank wants some of the profits, and the company wants maximum distribution. When General Motors, out of bankruptcy and newly profitable, went public in 2010, 10 underwriters were listed on the first prospectus, including all the big ones. Many more were added before the offering took place.

Here, it is quite likely that the rest of Wall Street stayed away because they feared alienating the very company whose stock was being sold.

Second, the G.M. prospectus, as with every other I.P.O. prospectus I have ever seen, tried to put its best foot forward. Within the bounds of securities laws, the prospectus writers did their best to attract investors. Chrysler’s, within the same bounds, is clearly aimed at alienating investors.

As such, it may become something of a collector’s item. A game of chicken between Chrysler’s two owners â€" Fiat, the Italian automaker, and a trust that provides benefits to Chrysler’s retirees â€" has burst into the open.

Each thinks the other is being unfair and is using threats to force concessions. If no one backs down, it is quite possible the company could be destroyed â€" something that would be disastrous to both. Each seems to be confident that the other will give in eventually.

But games of chicken can get out of hand.

The 2009 bankruptcies and bailouts of Chrysler and G.M. were messy. Some creditors were outraged, contending that they deserved more and that unionized workers deserved less. In both companies, the Treasury and trusts for workers’ benefits wound up owning big stakes.

At Chrysler, which had been woefully mismanaged by its two previous owners â€" Germany’s Daimler and Cerberus, the American private equity firm â€" the Obama administration concluded that the company’s best hope for survival was to find an automaker with a high-quality management team that could be a valuable partner for a company that had been left with no presence outside North America. Fiat was interested and seemed ideal. It had no United States presence and had technology Chrysler could use. Chrysler had technology Fiat could use. Sergio Marchionne, Fiat’s chief executive, became Chrysler’s chief executive as well.

p itemprop="articleBody"> Most of Chrysler’s stock was owned by a retiree trust, a voluntary employee benefits association, or VEBA. The United States and Canadian governments had stakes as well â€" thanks to their bailout â€" and Fiat had a stake.

The combination seems to be working well, benefiting both companies. Chrysler is doing better than the parent these days, and in the end it may turn out that Chrysler will have rescued Fiat as much as or more than Fiat rescued it.

The fact that Chrysler seems to be outperforming Fiat now may, however, say more about geography than competitiveness. The American car market is surging, while the Western European market is in a deep recession. In Italy, Fiat’s home market, new-car registrations are running at the lowest level in more than 30 years.

No one doubts that the two companies need each other, or that Fiat wants to buy the rest of Chrysler. And that is where the game of chicken is being played.

Under agreements that appear to have been poorly drafted, Fiat has a right to buy a substantial part of the VEBA’s interest every six months. The price is determined by a complicated formula that is supposed to represent what a market price for the stock would be if it were public.

It looks as if that formula may not be doing a very good job. When Fiat tried to make the first purchase last summer, it calculated the price as being about a third less than what it had voluntarily paid the Treasury a year earlier in a negotiated deal. The VEBA said the formula, under its interpretation, called for a much higher price. They went to court in Delaware to hash it out.

A ruling this summer gave Fiat a victory on important parts of the case but left others for a future trial. One detail still to be determined is whether the formula allows Fiat to use extraordinary losses to reduce the price it has to pay while ignoring similar gains that would raise the price. That seems to hinge on the meaning of a word (“charge”) that went undefined in the original document.

There are more such purchases scheduled to happen. For the VEBA, avoiding the formula might be very helpful. And the agreement provides that the formula vanishes with an I.P.O. After that, the market price would be used.

That is one reason that the VEBA may have had for exercising its right to sell some of its stock in an I.P.O.

Floyd Norris comments on finance and the economy at nytimes.com/economix.



EBay to Acquire Payments Start-Up

EBay said Thursday that it was acquiring Braintree, a Chicago payments start-up, for $800 million in cash. The company plans to combine it with its payments division, PayPal.

Braintree provides technology to an impressive roster of companies to help them process payments on the Web and mobile devices. Its clients include Rovio, Uber, OpenTable, Fab, Airbnb, TaskRabbit and Heroku. Braintree, which says it processes more than $12 billion a year, has long been a start-up to watch. The company also owns Venmo, a popular application that lets people pay each other through text messages.

David Marcus, the president of PayPal, said that the company had been watching Braintree for some time now.

“Their obsession with removing friction for next-generation commerce matched our own,” he said in a phone interview Thursday. “They bet on mobile very early on and their growth there has been phenomenal.”

Mr. Marcus also said that Braintree’s international reach impressed him, and the fact that the company was a good fit culturally. He said that Braintree would remain in Chicago and Venmo in New York, but the companies would collaborate to continue to find ways to “build a payments operating system that others can innovate on top of.”

Braintree is the latest company to be added to eBay’s shopping cart. The company also recently acquired Hunch, a recommendation engine; Svpply, a social shopping site; and Red Laser, a bar-code scanning application.

The deal is subject to regulatory approvals, but is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2013.



First-Round Bidding to Begin in Auction of IMG Talent Agency

The auction for IMG Worldwide, the sports, fashion and media talent agency, is finally kicking off.

First round bids for the company, which represents athletes and entertainers including Peyton Manning and Justin Timberlake, are due on Monday, according to people familiar with the matter. IMG is expected to sell for more than $2 billion, and potentially as much as $2.5 billion.

The private equity firm Forstmann Little acquired IMG for $750 million in 2004, and has expanded the scope of its services from talent representation to a broader array of sports and marketing services. The New York-based firm is selling assets as it winds down following the 2011 death of founder Theodore J. Forstmann.

Two bidder groups are said to be likely to make offers. William Morris Endeavor Entertainment, the talent agency run by Ari Emanuel, is working with its private equity backer Silver Lake Partners on a bid, these people said. Silver Lake earlier this year worked with Dell founder Michael Dell to take the personal computer maker private.

Creative Artists Agency, another Los Angeles, Calif., talent agency, is seen as the other frontrunner. CAA is also working with its own private equity backer, TPG. TPG and Silver Lake bought stakes in the respective talent agencies in recent years.

However Morgan Stanley and Evercore, the two investment banks working to sell IMG for Forstmann Little, have reached out to an unusually large pool of potential buyers.

As a result, several private equity firms and sovereign wealth funds may also put in first round bids. Among the other main contenders is said to be CVC, the European private equity firm. Other firms considering bids are said to include Carlyle, Bain Capital and Onyx.

KKR and New Mountain Capital are working on a joint bid, people close to the situation said. Steven B. Klinsky, the head of New Mountain, used to work at Forstmann Little.

One firm that was interested in IMG earlier this year, Colony Capital, made a preemptive bid that was rebuffed. It was not clear if Colony would participate in the auction. And Mukesh Ambani, the Indian billionaire behind Reliance Industries, which has a partnership with IMG, is also said to have lost interest.

Two other private equity firms unlikely to submit bids were Blackstone and Providence Equity Partners. Providence took a majority stake in a smaller IMG rival, Learfield Communications, earlier this month.

Another factor that could enlarge the pool of potential bidders is the strength of the debt markets. With interest rates remaining low, bidders are prepared to offer relatively little equity and instead finance most of the deal with debt.

Forstmann Little has told potential bidders it hoped to close any deal by Thanksgiving. But given the due diligence necessary, people close to the process expect the process to stretch into the holiday season.



Create a Caption: Mr. Dimon Goes to Washington

Jamie Dimon, the chief executive of JPMorgan Chase, arrived at the Justice Department on Thursday amid reports that the bank is negotiating a multibillion-dollar settlement over the sale of distressed mortgage securities ahead of the financial crisis.

The thought of Mr. Dimon sitting down in a room with Attorney General Eric Holder has excited Wall Street and the financial media.

Proposals have emerged that would require JPMorgan to pay anywhere from $3 billion to about $7 billion, people briefed on the negotiations said.

But before the proposals could proceed any further, Mr. Dimon had to show his New York driver’s license to G. Rocher, a security officer at the Justice Department building in Washington. What did the two discuss ahead of big talks? As always, we turn to Twitter for the answer.

Whatever Mr. Dimon said it must have worked. He soon entered the building.



A Fund for Bitcoins

The upstart stock exchange SecondMarket, which made a name for itself allowing investors to buy shares of private companies, is turning to the next new thing: bitcoin. On Thursday, SecondMarket is expected to begin raising money for an investment fund â€" the first of its kind in the United States â€" that will hold only bitcoins, allowing wealthy investors to bet on the future price of the trendy but much debated virtual currency, Peter Lattman and Nathaniel Popper report in DealBook. The fund will be called the Bitcoin Investment Trust.

“If you speak with people who have tried to purchase bitcoin in the past â€" you’ll hear, ‘it’s a difficult process,’ ‘it’s a confusing process,’ ‘it’s a scary process,’” said Barry Silbert, the chief executive of SecondMarket, based in New York. “We want to make it an accessible asset class.”

SecondMarket’s bitcoin venture is likely to feed the debate about the legitimacy and legality of a form of money that exists outside the conventional banking system and is sometimes used in illicit transactions. The technology investors Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss announced the creation of a similar product a few months ago, but their vehicle will be an exchange-traded fund, or E.T.F., accessible to all investors, meaning it must go through a lengthy and uncertain review process with federal regulators.

MISSED OPPORTUNITY IN CASE INVOLVING JPMORGAN  | “Both the Securities and Exchange Commission and JPMorgan Chase won great public relations victories last week. But the public lost â€" and in ways that go far beyond this one spat,” Jesse Eisinger of ProPublica writes in his column, The Trade. “By cracking down on the bank for its faulty internal controls in the $6 billion London Whale trading loss, the S.E.C. can claim to be the ferocious regulator we have all been waiting for. JPMorgan and its chief executive, Jamie Dimon, got the best coverage they could have hoped for under the circumstances.”

The admission of wrongdoing that the S.E.C. wrung from JPMorgan “was nice,” Mr. Eisinger writes, “but the S.E.C. did not charge any top executives with misleading disclosure.” Mr. Eisinger continues: “The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, in its huge report on the trading loss, made a convincing case that the chief financial officer at the time, Douglas L. Braunstein, made several highly misleading statements in an April 13, 2012, conference call with shareholders and the public.”

DETROIT’S EXTRA PENSION PAYMENTS  | “Detroit’s municipal pension fund made payments for decades to retirees, active workers and others above and beyond normal benefits, costing the struggling city billions of dollars and helping push it into bankruptcy, according to people who have reviewed the payments,” Mary Williams Walsh reports in DealBook. “The payments, which were not publicly disclosed, included bonuses to retirees, supplements to workers not yet retired and cash to the families of workers who died before becoming eligible to collect a pension, according to reports by an outside actuary and other people with knowledge of the matter.”

A report on the pension system from Detroit’s auditor general and inspector general is expected to be released on Thursday. Ms. Walsh continues: “How much each person received is not known. But available records suggest that the trustees approving the payments did not discriminate; nearly everybody in the plan received them. Most of the trustees on Detroit’s two pension boards represent organized labor, and for years they could outvote anyone who challenged the payments.”

ON THE AGENDA  | The third estimate of gross domestic product in the second quarter is released at 8:30 a.m. Barry Silbert, the chief of SecondMarket, is on CNBC at 6:30 a.m. Naval Ravikant, the chief executive of AngelList, which allows companies to raise money under new rules, is on CNBC at 11 a.m. Chelsea Clinton is on Bloomberg TV at 8:30 a.m. Hamilton E. James, president of the Blackstone Group, is on Bloomberg TV at 11:15 a.m.

ORACLE’S VICTORY AT SEA  | Larry Ellison, the software billionaire who runs Oracle, skipped a long-scheduled keynote address at his company’s annual conference in San Francisco this week so he could watch his sailing team from a chase boat. Though his priorities were questioned, Oracle Team USA achieved victory in the 34th America’s Cup on Wednesday. It was the “greatest comeback in America’s Cup history and one of the most dramatic in any sport,” The New York Times writes.

ALIBABA HEADED TO NEW YORK FOR I.P.O.  | “No business represents the rapid rise of the Internet in China quite like Alibaba, a company that is part eBay, part Google and part PayPal,” DealBook’s Michael J. de la Merced writes. “Alibaba is now moving forward with plans for one of the biggest initial public offerings since Facebook’s rocky debut last year â€" but in New York and not in its home market. Much is at stake for the Chinese company, as well as its prospective advisers and potential investors.”

Mergers & Acquisitions »

Lixil of Japan to Buy Grohe for $4.1 Billion  |  The Japanese building products company Lixil and the Development Bank of Japan have agreed to buy the German bathroom fittings company Grohe for $4.1 billion. DealBook »

Concerns Mount Over J.C. Penney  |  The retailer’s shares fell 15 percent on Wednesday after Goldman Sachs debt analysts released a downbeat assessment of its prospects, The Wall Street Journal writes. WALL STREET JOURNAL

Stryker to Buy MAKO Surgical for $1.65 BillionStryker to Buy MAKO Surgical for $1.65 Billion  |  The price of $30 a share represents a huge 86 percent premium for MAKO, which makes tools for robotic assisted surgery in orthopedics. DealBook »

Dr. Martens Said to Be in Advanced Talks to Be Sold  | 
WALL STREET JOURNAL

It’s Time for Gates to Part Ways With Microsoft  |  Bill Gates’s many talents do not include effectiveness as chairman, Robert Cyran of Reuters Breakingviews writes. Under his leadership, Microsoft’s board left Steven A. Ballmer, the chief executive, in place too long. REUTERS BREAKINGVIEWS

INVESTMENT BANKING »

Blankfein’s Message to Occupy Wall Street  |  On a panel at the Clinton Global Initiative meeting on Wednesday afternoon, Lloyd C. Blankfein, the chief executive of Goldman Sachs, was asked to reflect on the second anniversary of the Occupy Wall Street movement. “I would say to Occupy Wall Street that business has helped lift more people out of poverty than philanthropy,” he said, according to CNBC. CNBC

Deutsche Bank Said to Propose a New Bond Platform  |  The German firm Deutsche Bank “is trying to drum up interest with some of its largest competitors to create a multidealer U.S. bond trading platform at the same time that asset managers discuss ways to make buying and selling debt easier, according to people familiar with the matter,” Bloomberg News reports. BLOOMBERG NEWS

In China, the Case of the Disappearing Moguls  |  Several prominent tycoons in China have recently disappeared from public view amid a corruption scandal that may “indicate a fresh front in Chinese political infighting,” The Wall Street Journal reports. WALL STREET JOURNAL

Barclays to End Wealth Management Services in 130 Countries  |  “This is part of our new strategy, focusing on reducing complexity and competing where we can win,” a spokesman for Barclays told Reuters. REUTERS

PRIVATE EQUITY »

BlackBerry Cancels Conference Call to Discuss Results  |  BlackBerry said that while its quarterly financial results would still be released, the call scheduled for Friday had been called off because of a conditional and tentative bid for the company. NEW YORK TIMES

Fairfax Chief Expresses Confidence Over BlackBerry Bid  |  “We wouldn’t put our name to such a high-profile deal if we didn’t feel confident that at the end of the day that our due diligence would be fine and we’d be able to finance it,” Prem Watsa, the head of Fairfax Financial Holdings, told Reuters. REUTERS

HEDGE FUNDS »

A Hedge Fund Drama, With Hot Dogs  |  In a fictional script, Bess Levin of Dealbreaker imagines what might have happened when Steven A. Cohen of SAC Capital Advisors arranged for a hot dog truck to supply free food to the hedge fund’s employees. DEALBREAKER

Bank of England Says Hedge Funds Could Pose Risk to Stability  |  The financial policy committee of the Bank of England said it planned to gather more information on hedge funds so that “a more complete assessment of risks to financial stability can be made.” WALL STREET JOURNAL

I.P.O./OFFERINGS »

Twitter Strikes Advertising Pact With N.F.L.  |  The announcement about the deal with the National Football League came after Twitter forged another advertising deal with CBS. ALLTHINGSD

Fearing Change at a Publicly Traded Twitter  |  “Twitter is, fundamentally, a strange, nearly surreal service. Unlike Facebook, it isn’t for everyone. That’s what the initiated love about it â€" but now that Twitter is going public and looking for growth, Twitter’s inherent weirdness is at risk,” Farhad Manjoo, a columnist for The Wall Street Journal, writes. WALL STREET JOURNAL

VENTURE CAPITAL »

Tech Giants Fear Patent Wars in Europe  |  “In the United States, technology companies like Google, Apple and Microsoft have spent years and hundreds of millions of dollars to defend patent-infringement lawsuits by companies that make a business of buying technology patents primarily for suing software companies and makers of products like smartphones,” The New York Times writes. “Now they worry that Europe could soon become a broad battleground for similar court battles.” NEW YORK TIMES

LEGAL/REGULATORY »

ICAP to Pay $87 Million Fine in Libor-Fixing Case  |  The Justice Department also brought criminal charges against three former ICAP employees on Wednesday over their roles in manipulating the benchmark London interbank offered rate. DEALBOOK

Things Traders Say, ICAP EditionThings Traders Say, ICAP Edition  |  Curry meals, Champagne and steaks were among the rewards promised to ICAP brokers, according to documents released on Wednesday by authorities in a Libor manipulation case. DealBook »

Britain Sues Over Caps on Bankers’ BonusesBritain Sues Over Caps on Bankers’ Bonuses  |  Britain said on Wednesday that it had filed a lawsuit at the European Court of Justice contesting a proposed cap on bankers’ bonuses. DealBook »

Citigroup to Pay $395 Million in Freddie Mac Settlement  | 
ASSOCIATED PRESS



Lixil of Japan to Buy Grohe for $4.1 Billion

Updated, 8:25 a.m. |

LONDON - The Japanese building products company Lixil and the Development Bank of Japan agreed on Thursday to buy the German bathroom fittings company Grohe for 3.06 billion euros ($4.1 billion).

Under the terms of the deal, Lixil and the Development Bank of Japan will acquire an 87.5 percent stake in Grohe, which manufactures premium-price faucets, shower heads and other bathroom fittings. The sellers are the private equity firms TPG Capital and DLJ Merchant Banking Partners, a unit of Credit Suisse.

The deal is the second this month to involve a Japanese acquisition of a European company. Suntory Beverage and Food recently agreed to buy two British brands, Lucozade and Ribena, from the drug maker GlaxoSmithKline for £1.4 billion ($2.2 billion).

The multibillion-dollar takeover of Grohe represents the largest ever deal by a Japanese company in Germany, Europe’s largest economy, according to the data provider Thomson Reuters. The sale is more than double the previous record, held by the technology company TDK, which bought its German rival Epcos for $1.9 billion in 2008.

For Lixil, which produces a range of bathroom, kitchen and other building products, the deal helps to expand its footprint, particularly in Asia, where Grohe already has operations in China, Indonesia and Thailand.

“Grohe is one of the most well-known brands in the global sanitary market,” Lixil’s president, Yoshiaki Fujimori, said in a statement on Thursday.

The future of Grohe, which employees around 9,000 people worldwide, had been uncertain for months after its private equity owners had contemplated either selling the company or potentially floating it through an initial public offering.

TPG Capital and DLJ acquired Grohe in 2004 for 1.5 billion euros. Grohe’s pretax profit last year rose 18 percent, to 273 million euros, while annual revenue also rose 21 percent, to 1.4 billion euros.

“Lixil is a perfect match,” Grohe’s chief executive, David Haines, said in a statement.

Lixil, best known in Japan as a maker of doors and windows, as well as toilets and plumbing fixtures, grew out of the merger of the building material giants Tostem and Inax in 2001. It was known as the Tosten Inax Holding Corporation until 2011. The company, based in Tokyo, has expanded aggressively in recent years through a number of international acquisitions

This year, Lixil agreed to buy the bathroom fixtures firm American Standard Brands for $342 million. In 2011, it bought the Italian construction company Permasteelisa for around 573 million euros.

Expanding overseas sales is especially important for Lixil, which faces a shrinking housing market in aging Japan. Analysts expect a temporary jump in housing-related industries next year as consumers race to beat a planned rise in Japan’s consumption tax rate in April.

But in the longer term, the Japanese market is expected to shrink as the overall population falls. The company says it hopes overseas markets will eventually account for as much as a third of its sales, from less than 15 percent last year. Over all, the company aims to expand revenue to 3 trillion yen in the midterm, from 1.4 trillion yen in the fiscal year ended March 31.

To finance the Grohe deal, which is expected to close in the first quarter of 2014, Lixil has secured about 220 billion yen in loans from Japan’s three biggest banks, including the Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group.

Lixil joins a steady march of Japanese firms buying foreign companies, though the pace of Japan’s overseas acquisitions has slowed somewhat this year, thanks to a weaker yen.

Acxit Capital Management, Credit Suisse, Goldman Sachs and the law firms Weil, Gotshal & Manges and Clifford Chance advised Grohe, TPG Capital and DLJ, while BNP Paribas, Moelis & Company, SMBC Nikko and the law firm Linklaters advised Lixil.



Under Pressure From Ackman, Air Products Shakes Up Board

The activist investor William A. Ackman has had a bruising year, but with one investment, Air Products and Chemicals, he now has something to show for his effort.

Air Products, a producer of industrial gases, announced on Thursday morning that it would add three new directors to its board and begin a search for a new chief executive. The changes were supported by Mr. Ackman, whose firm, Pershing Square Capital Management, acquired a 9.8 percent stake in the company this year.

The current chief executive and chairman, John E. McGlade, will retire next year, the company said on Thursday. He will remain at the helm of the company during a search process led by a newly formed committee of the board, and then will continue as chairman during a transition period in 2014, the company said, adding that the incoming chief would also join the board.

“As I approach age 60 and the board plans for my retirement, the actions our board is announcing today will ensure an orderly leadership transition,” Mr. McGlade said in a statement. “We have had a constructive dialogue with Pershing Square, our largest shareholder, and are pleased they are supportive of the actions our board is announcing today for the benefit of all Air Products shareholders.”

Mr. Ackman’s investment in Air Products, valued at about $2.2 billion in July, is the largest his firm has made. The company, based in Allentown, Pa., reported about $10 billion of revenue and $1.5 billion in operating income in 2012 but has lagged its rivals in stock price performance in recent years.

“We invested in Air Products because it is a great business in an industry with excellent long-term prospects,” Mr. Ackman said in a statement on Thursday. “In recent weeks, we have been delighted to get to know John and the rest of the board working with them on their mission of continuous improvement and long-term shareholder value creation.”

The three new directors, who will join the board immediately, bring experience in chemicals and industry. One of them, Seifi Ghasemi, is the chairman and chief executive of Rockwood Holdings, a specialty chemicals company.

Edward L. Monser, another new director, is the president and chief operating officer of Emerson Electric, an industrial controls products company. The third new director is Matthew Paull, the retired chief financial officer of the McDonald’s Corporation.

Mr. Monser and Mr. Paull will stand for election at Air Products’ annual meeting next year, the company said, while Mr. Ghasemi will stand for election in 2015. Pershing Square has agreed to support the company’s slate of nominees at next year’s annual meeting, the company said.

With three directors being added, three existing directors will retire before the annual meeting next year, the company said.



Longtime Madoff Accountant Is Arrested

Federal authorities, deepening their criminal investigation of Bernard L. Madoff’s multibillion-dollar Ponzi scheme, have arrested Paul J. Konigsberg, a longtime accountant in Mr. Madoff’s inner circle, according to
people briefed on the case.

At 6 a.m. on Thursday, agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation met Mr. Konigsberg at his lawyers’ offices in Midtown Manhattan and arrested him. He is expected to make a court appearance later in the day.

A founding partner of Konigsberg Wolf & Company, a midsize New York accounting firm that is now shuttered, Mr. Konigsberg had a close business relationship with Mr. Madoff dating to at least the 1980s.

He was the only nonfamily shareholder in Mr. Madoff’s London operation, which played a crucial role in transferring stolen money around the globe. Mr. Konigsberg prepared tax returns for two family foundations and served as an accountant for dozens of families who invested with the firm. Mr. Madoff often referred his investors to Mr. Konigsberg for their tax services.

“Paul Konigsberg, a 77-year-old accountant, is an innocent victim of Bernie Madoff,” said Reed Brodsky, a lawyer for Mr. Konigsberg at Gibson Dunn & Crutcher. “He looks forward to clearing his good name at trial.”

The charges against Mr. Konigsberg come as the government faces a December deadline to bring additional charges connected with the Madoff fraud. When Mr. Madoff turned himself in on Dec. 12, 2008, that started the clock ticking on a five-year statute of limitations for securities fraud crimes.

Federal prosecutors asked Mr. Konigsberg’s lawyers to grant them an extension of the legal deadline, but they refused, leading to Thursday’s arrest, according to people briefed on the case.

Mr. Madoff, who is serving a 150-year prison sentence, has insisted that he acted alone. Yet Mr. Konigsberg is the 15th individual charged in the case.

On Oct. 7, five former employees of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities are scheduled to stand trial in Federal District Court in Manhattan on charges they aided the fraud.

Each of the five employees - Daniel Bonventre, Annette Bongiorno, Joann Crupi, Jerome O’Hara and George Perez â€" worked at the firm for more than 15 years in a variety of low-level roles, but ones that the government
said were key to perpetrating Mr. Madoff’s long-running scheme. Ms. Bongiorno, for example, was Mr. Madoff’s longtime secretary. Mr. O’Hara and Mr. Perez were computer programmers who produced the firm’s account statements.

The trial is likely to last several months, and the defendants are expected to argue that they were manipulated and deceived by Mr. Madoff and had no idea their boss was a crook.

Federal prosecutors are still weighing additional criminal charges. Among those under continued scrutiny is Shana Madoff Swanson, Mr. Madoff’s niece and a former senior lawyer and compliance official at the firm. Ms.
Swanson’s father, Peter Madoff, was Mr. Madoff’s No. 2 at the firm, and is serving a 10-year sentence after admitting to falsifying documents and lying to securities regulators.

Federal authorities are also examining the role of JPMorgan Chase in Mr. Madoff’s fraud. Mr. Madoff moved billions of dollars of investors’ cash in and out of Chase bank accounts up until his crimes were revealed.
Investigators are focused on whether the bank failed to conduct adequate due diligence and properly alert regulators to suspicions about Mr. Madoff’s business, said people with knowledge of the investigation.

JPMorgan’s part in the fraud was illuminated by a 2010 lawsuit brought against the bank by Irving H. Picard, the bankruptcy trustee working to retrieve money for Mr. Madoff’s victims. A lawyer for the trustee has argued that Mr.
Madoff “would not have been able to commit this massive Ponzi scheme without this bank.”

In an e-mail sent 18 months before Mr. Madoff’s arrest, a JPMorgan employee said that a bank executive “just told me that there is a well-known cloud over the head of Madoff and that his returns are speculated to be part of a Ponzi scheme.”

A JPMorgan spokesman declined to comment.

Actual cash losses from the Madoff fraud are estimated at about $17.5 billion, but the paper wealth that was wiped out totaled more than $64 billion. Mr. Picard has thus far recovered about $9.4 billion and continues
to trace the victims’ funds. He has filed more than 1,000 lawsuits, and the process of recouping losses is expected to carry on for years.

Mr. Konigsberg served as the accountant for dozens of Mr. Madoff’s investors. Trained as a lawyer, he received a degree from Brooklyn Law School and a master’s in taxation from New York University School of Law. He worked for some of Mr. Madoff’s earliest investors, including Carl Shapiro, a Boston businessman, and Mr. Shapiro’s son-in-law, Bob Jaffe, who recruited many Madoff investors in Palm Beach, Fla.

In 2010, Mr. Shapiro, Mr. Jaffe and their family members, who held much of their money at JPMorgan Chase, agreed to forfeit $625 million in Madoff profits to the trustee and the Justice Department.

A principal in Mr. Konigsberg’s firm, Steven B. Mendelow, had a run-in with regulators related to Mr. Madoff two decades ago. Mr. Mendelow settled a civil case in 1993 with the Securities and Exchange Commission for having set up a firm that improperly funneled nearly $90 million to Mr. Madoff.

Providing accounting services for Mr. Madoff paid handsomely. Mr. Konigsberg and his wife, Judith, live in Greenwich, Conn., and spend winter months in Palm Beach Gardens, Fla. The Konigsbergs socialized with Mr.
Madoff and his wife, Ruth, once taking a ski vacation to the Swiss Alps along with a group of Madoff associates.

Mr. Konigsberg is the second outside accountant criminally charged in the Madoff case. David G. Friehling, the longtime independent accountant for the Madoff firm, pleaded guilty in 2009 and has been cooperating with prosecutors. Mr. Friehling ran Friehling & Horowitz, a three-employee firm based in a Rockland County strip shopping mall that provided auditing services for Mr. Madoff’s company.



Dominique Strauss-Kahn Joins an Investment Firm

LONDON - Dominique Strauss-Kahn, formerly head of the International Monetary Fund whose career was damaged by a series of sexual scandals, is transforming himself into an investment banker.

Mr. Strauss-Kahn joined Anatevka, an investment banking boutique based in Luxembourg, as chairman, the company’s founder, Thierry Leyne, said on Thursday. Anatevka will soon be renamed LSK, or Leyne, Strauss-Kahn and Partners, and offer investment banking advice and services, Mr. Leyne said.

“There is a lot of demand from big groups to benefit from the advice of Mr. Strauss-Kahn,” Mr. Leyne said by phone. The two men started to work together on some client issues a few months ago and then agreed to join offices, Mr. Leyne said. Mr. Strauss-Kahn’s new role was reported earlier in The Financial Times.

At LSK, Mr. Strauss-Kahn is expected to continue his work as an economic adviser to the Serbian government, which was announced earlier this month. As part of that role, Mr. Strauss-Kahn is helping Serbia restructure its foreign debt, attract foreign investment and manage relations with the I.M.F.

Mr. Strauss-Kahn, a onetime presidential contender in France, will be working from the LSK offices in Luxembourg and Geneva. Apart from Serbia, LSK will also be working with clients in Morocco, South Sudan and Russia, Mr. Leyne said. Mr. Strauss-Kahn also joined the board of a banking subsidiary of Rosneft, the Russian state oil company, this year.

Mr. Strauss-Kahn is seeking a new career after resigning as head of the I.M.F. in 2011 after accusations that he sexually assaulted a housekeeper in a New York hotel. The charges were later dropped, but Mr. Strauss-Kahn continues to face charges of being involved in a prostitution ring in France. Lawyers for Mr. Strauss-Kahn have denied any wrongdoing by their client, arguing that he was present at certain gatherings but did not know that the women there were being paid.