Total Pageviews

A Legal Brawl in Mexico as Bond Buyers Look On

Trouble is brewing in the industrial heartland of Mexico, but it's not the violent drug wars that have plagued the boomtown of Monterrey. It is a legal brawl over the bankruptcy of the country's largest glassmaker, Vitro.

Hedge funds and others who own the company's bonds have accused Vitro of conspiring to bilk them out of hundreds of millions of dollars by exploiting legal loopholes. Vitro, meanwhile, says its actions were perfectly legal under the Mexican system, and accuses the hedge funds of trying to impose American laws on a foreign court.

The cross-border battle touches the foundations of international investing and law, some academics and investors say. The dispute also raises questions for global investors navigating legal systems in emerging countries that may be different from those found in the industrial world.

Vitro creditors say that if the Vitro's bankruptcy plan were to be upheld, other Mexican companies could have trouble raising money in the United States.

When a company files for bankruptcy in the United States, the absolute priority rule prevails. The rule establishes an order as to who is paid out first when a company is in bankruptcy; senior bondholders get the most and shareholders are often wiped out.

In the Vitro case, the opposite seems to have happened. The shareholders, including the Sada family, which has owned the company for more than 100 years, maintained control of the glassmaker. The bondholders, meanwhile, received between 40 to 60 cents for every dollar of debt they owned under the company's bankruptcy plan, according to some estimates.

The case has sent ripples through the Mexican debt market. Creditors are leery of other companies pulling a similar move. Cemex, a major Mexican cement maker, recently had to place a clause into bond documents promising not to do what Vitro did. Market participants have taken to calling this attitude the “Vitro effect.”

The com pany and its lawyers dismiss the notion of a Vitro effect. They say that Mexican law has always had the loophole, which allows a company to use loans to its subsidiaries to generate votes to approve a bankruptcy plan. Nothing is different, they say, except for the obstinacy of the parties on the other side of the table: Elliott Management and Aurelius Capital Management.

“If you're a sophisticated party that chooses to go and institute litigation in Mexico, you can hardly claim the benefits of U.S. law, and particularly the benefits of U.S. policy, to protect you from the decision that comes out of that court,” said Andrew M. LeBlanc, a lawyer for Vitro, in arguments before a federal judge in Dallas.

Despite the uproar among Vitro's creditors , both Elliott and Aurelius continued to buy the bonds even after the company issued a news release detailing a number of the actions that the hedge funds are now questioning, people briefed on the matter say. It is uncl ear why they doubled down, and the hedge funds have declined to comment on the case.

“They bought into a fight,” said one lawyer involved in the case.



Workday Prices I.P.O. at $28

The initial public offering of Workday, a provider of cloud-based applications for human resources, was priced at $28 a share on Thursday evening - well above its expected range.

Earlier this week, Workday raised the price range for its offering, to $24 to $26, as investor appetite proved exceptionally robust. The Class A shares will trade Friday on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker WDAY.

The $637 million offering values the company at nearly $4.5 billion.

The demand for Workday's I.P.O. has defied the experience of many companies that have sought to go public so far this fall, with Dave & Buster's Entertainment withdrawing its planned offering last week amid tepid demand.

Other companies have met with more success in recent days, however. Realogy, the owner of the Coldwell Banker real estate agency, priced its offering at the top of its range on Wednesday and posted a 27 percent gain in its first day of trading.

Shutterstock, a p rovider of stock images, priced its I.P.O. above its expected range, at $17, and enjoyed a 27 percent jump in trading on Thursday.

Workday has been considered one of the most attractive companies pursuing an initial offering. It focuses on providing human resources software, taking advantage of cloud computing to provide advanced analyses for customers.

Among its key selling points is a lower cost for clients, since the company's products don't need the onerous service contracts that come standard with competing oferings.

The company has lost money every year since at least 2007, reporting a $80 million million loss for the year ended Jan. 31, according to its most recent prospectus. But its revenue more than doubled every year during that same time period.

Such is the hype around Workday that larger competitors have been paying increasing attention. Larry Ellison, Oracle‘s voluble chief executive, has mentioned the smaller rival by name several tim es during recent earnings calls.

Some of that may arise from Workday's beginnings. The company was founded seven years ago by David Duffield and Aneel Bhusri, who formerly led PeopleSoft, the human resources software maker that Oracle bought after a bruising takeover battle.

The company plans to use its newly public shares for acquisitions, and hopes that the I.P.O. will raise its visibility in the market place.

Workday's offering was led by Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs.



In a Clash of Two Billionaires, a Peek at a Mexican Financier

High above Columbus Circle, atop the Time Warner Center, is one of the most expensive apartments in Manhattan, a sleek aerie of steel and stone, high windows and soaring views.

It is the home of David Martinez, a Mexican financier who has minted a fortune buying and selling the debt of troubled countries and companies from Argentina to Pakistan. For the two-floor residence, he paid about $42 million in 2003, then spent even more on additions and renovations, covering the 12,000 square foot space in stone and stainless steel.

The apartment has a private art collection that is said to include a $140 million Jackson Pollock. But for all his extravagant spending, Mr. Martinez is, even to his associates, something of a mystery.

Now a legal battle with another powerful investor is drawing back a curtain on Mr. Martinez's secretive world. While investors often have disputes that end up in court, this cross-border fight is with one of the giants in global distre ssed debt - Paul E. Singer, a major Republican donor. The dispute, and its eventual victor, could have implications for other companies in the world's fastest-growing economies.

The fight is over the bankruptcy of Mexico's largest glassmaker, Vitro, a 103-year-old company run by the Sada family, one of the wealthiest in Monterrey. Allegations abound of covert meetings, fraudulent debts and crooked courts in a bankruptcy that ended up leaving control of the company in the hands of its shareholders, while costing bondholders as much as 60 percent of their investment, according to some estimates.

That is exactly the opposite of what typically happens in an American bankruptcy, and Mr. Singer and other Vitro creditors have argued that if Vitro and Mr. Martinez prevail, other Mexican companies could have trouble raising money in the United States.

Both men are known as “vulture investors,” a term applied to those who buy up cheap debt that no one wants. The strategy has made Mr. Singer's company, Elliott Management, one of the most successful hedge funds in the world. Mr. Singer, 68, cut his teeth wrangling payments on defaulted debt from countries like Peru and Congo, and has earned a reputation for bare-knuckled doggedness unparalleled on Wall Street. Just last week, Elliott Management persuaded a court in Ghana to seize an Argentine naval ship in a dispute over the South American country's bonds.

Yet he may have met his match in Mr. Martinez. Over the last 20 years, the 55-year-old financier has plowed billions of dollars into troubled corners of the global economy, often aligning himself with the management of bankrupt companies.

“If you don't know who the sucker is in a particular deal, it's probably you,” a top investor in distressed debt said. “When David is involved, you know he isn't the sucker.”

He and others interviewed for this article declined to be identified speaking about Mr. Martinez, citing the continuing litigation or fear of angering him. Through a spokesman, Mr. Martinez declined to comment.

Little is known about the 55-year-old financier, who splits his time between New York and London, where he runs an obscure investment company called Fintech Advisory Ltd. In life as in business, Mr. Martinez treads lightly. He is fond of shell companies, whether to buy artwork or to pay household expenses. Those he hires often know him only as “the client.”

But Mr. Martinez and Mr. Singer are not strangers. They have clashed before, most notably during Argentina's debt restructuring in 2005. While Elliott is still holding out for a more lucrative settlement with the nation over its defaulted bonds, Fintech sided with Argentina in 2005, a move that some bondholders felt undermined efforts to force the country to pay what it owed.

In the case of Vitro, Elliott and allied investors contend that Mr. Martinez helped the Mexican company muscle inve stors out of hundreds of millions of dollars through financial sleight of hand. Mr. Singer and his counterparts, who own about $700 million worth of the company's old debt, have called Vitro's efforts “a testament to audacity, brazen manipulation and greed.”

Vitro says that it has done nothing illegal. The maneuvers, it says, are standard practice under Mexican law and have been used in many other bankruptcies there. Fintech noted that a United States bankruptcy court, which is handling the bankruptcy of Vitro's United States subsidiaries, found no wrongdoing this summer. “Such McCarthy-like allegations were unsupported,” lawyers for Fintech wrote in court documents.

The conflict has its roots in 2009, when Vitro found itself mired in trouble after the financial crisis. Bad derivatives bets had dried up its cash, and it began defaulting on its debt. The company called on Mr. Martinez for help.

To get some much-needed cash, the company struck a deal with the investor: a $75 million loan in exchange for the title to several of its properties. As part of the arrangement, Mr. Martinez was given an option to return the properties to Vitro, once it emerged from bankruptcy, in exchange for a 24 percent stake in the company - effectively aligning his interests with management as it negotiated with other creditors.

In mid-2010, he went to the different banks that Vitro owed money to and bought the claims. In the process, Mr. Martinez became the biggest individual outside creditor, owning about $600 million worth of claims.

The company began taking big loans from its subsidiaries, in effect creating a fresh class of creditors outside of the hedge funds - a group under its control, with the rights to approve any bankruptcy plan. Subsidiaries went from owing the parent company about $1.2 billion to being owed $1.5 billion.

With the help of Mr. Martinez, the company outvoted many other bondholders to approve a reo rganization plan.

That maneuver was upheld by a court in Monterrey, allowing Vitro to proceed with a plan that pays creditors an estimated 40 to 60 percent of what they are owed and keeps the Sada family in control.

Mr. Singer and the hedge funds have taken the fight to the United States, suing Vitro and Mr. Martinez. This summer, the hedge funds won a round, as a federal judge in Dallas declined to uphold the Mexican court's ruling. Arguments in the appeal were heard earlier this month.

The outcome of this case, experts say, could have could have implications for other companies in fast-growing economies. A country that appears to be undermining protections that are typically granted to creditors in a bankruptcy might scare investors away. “This is a precedent-setting case, no matter how it turns out,” said Arturo Porzecanski, economist in residence at American University's School of International Service. “It has highlighted apparent loopholes in th e bankruptcy law of Mexico, through which Vitro ran an 18-wheel truck.”

In suing Fintech, the hedge funds encountered one obstacle early on: they couldn't find Mr.. Martinez.

When servers went to Fintech's Park Avenue offices to deliver the summons, they could not reach him. They stood outside the Time Warner Center for weeks hoping to catch him, to no avail.

Eventually, the lawsuit found its way to the investment company in London. .

Mr. Martinez was born in 1957 and grew up in Monterrey, which is home to some of Mexico's largest industrial companies. Power there is heavily concentrated among businessmen in the so-called Group of 10, a club that includes the Sada family, which controls Vitro.

Though Mr. Martinez was not a part of that circle, he has cultivated deep connections to it. The Sadas relied on Mr. Martinez to help them maintain control of another of their companies that went bankrupt in 2004.

As a young man, Mr. Martinez was a member of Regnum Christi, an evangelical group related to the Legionaries of Christ, an influential Roman Catholic order in Mexico that includes among its benefactors the billionaire Carlos Slim. After earning an engineering degree from the Tecnológico de Monterrey, Mr. Martinez moved to Rome to study philosophy at the Pontifical Gregorian University and considered becoming a priest.

But he was drawn to Wall Street instead, and earned a third degree from Harvard Business School before taking a job at Citigroup on the emerging-markets desk in New York. There, he began his long affair with distressed debt in far-flung places. In 1985, he left the bank and eventually founded Fintech.

While it is unclear how much money the company controls, or even how many employees work there, bits and pieces have emerged about Mr. Martinez over the years. Often it relates to his art collection, which includes the works of Damien Hirst and Mark Rothko.

In his lavish redoubt overlooking the city and Central Park from the penthouse of the Time Warner Center's South Tower, Mr. Martinez has fashioned a gallery for his art. The apartment has a two-story living room and a reflecting pool, according to public records and interviews with people familiar with the unit. A special system has been rigged to support one exceptionally heavy piece of art.

Even before the costly renovations by the architect Peter Marino, the home was among the city's most expensive residences.

But Mr. Martinez still had spending to do. In the fall of 2006, word spread that Jackson Pollock's “No. 5, 1948” had been sold for $140 million, a record at the time. The buyer was said to be Mr. Martinez - a rumor that lawyers for Mr. Martinez denied, sending the art world into a state of confusion as to the whereabouts of the painting.

Through a spokesman, Mr. Martinez still denies that he owns the work. But according to several people with knowledge of the colle ction, the painting currently hangs in his New York home.

Charles V. Bagli contributed reporting.



Blankfein Adds to Warnings of a Fiscal Cliff

Appearing alongside the authors of the Simpson-Bowles reform plan, Lloyd C. Blankfein, the chief of Goldman Sachs, warned in an interview on Thursday on CNBC that the fiscal cliff threatens to derail the economic recovery. Erskine Bowles added that the media should be asking President Obama and Mitt Romney about specific solutions. And Alan Simpson warned that Americans should bet against stupidity in Congress. Read more »

Icahn Bids to Take Control of Oshkosh Truck

Carl C. Icahn escalated his proxy fight with the the vehicle maker Oshkosh Corporation on Thursday by offering to take over the company for $32.50 a share, or about $3 billion.

The price represents a 21 percent premium to Oshkosh's closing price on Wednesday. Mr. Icahn, who has a roughly 10 percent stake in Oshkosh, urged shareholders to accept his bid.

Oshkosh's shares rose more than 11 percent on Thursday to trade around $30.

“I strongly believe that Oshkosh needs proactive shareholders to bring a proactive management team together to weather a volatile economy,” Mr. Icahn said in a statement.

“Mismanagement of this company has resulted in a lost decade of shareholder value,” he added.

The tender offer is conditioned on Mr. Icahn's nominees being elected to Oshkosh's board at the next shareholder meeting. If 40.1 percent of shares accept the offer, bringing Mr. Icahn's stake above 50 percent, the investor will seek to reschedule the meeting to a sooner date.

Oshkosh advised shareholders on Thursday to take no action in response to the offer. The board plans to announce its position within 10 business days.

There was speculation on Thursday that Mr. Icahn may look to combine Oshkosh with another truck maker, Navistar International. Mr. Icahn has also been pushing for changes at Navistar, and the company agreed this week to install three of his nominees on its board.

Shareholders of Oshkosh have 45 days to accept Mr. Icahn's offer. But that deadline would likely be extended if the investor gets strong support for his plan.



Boom in Mortgages Is Expected to Benefit Banks\' Profits

Federal stimulus has ignited a boom in mortgage refinancing, benefiting both homeowners and banks. And the good times could continue as the government steps up its support of the broad housing market.

The proof will be in the profits.

On Friday, Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase, the top two mortgage lenders in the country, are scheduled to report quarterly earnings. Their results - and the wave of other bank reports that follow - will offer clues as to whether the current mortgage boom is sustainable or set to fizzle.

“We expect mortgage revenue to continue to be elevated in the third quarter and possibly into next year,” said Jason Goldberg, a banking analyst at Barclays.

In the third quarter, banks probably originated as much as $450 billion of home loans, according to estimates by Inside Mortgage Finance, a publication that tracks the industry. That figure, which includes both refinances of existing mortgages and new loans to purchase a house, would be a considerable jump from the previous period. In the second quarter, banks originated $405 billion, with 68 percent as refinancings.

Since the financial crisis of 2008, some large banks have found themselves well positioned to make money when the mortgage market gets hot.

It comes down to the advantageous role banks play as the middlemen in the mortgage machine. Instead of holding on to new mortgages that earn interest over a number of years, banks sell nearly all of them to investors after packaging them into bonds. The federal government, through entities like Fannie Mae, attaches a guarantee of repayment on the loans, making the bonds even more attractive to the investors.

When the banks sell the mortgages as bonds, they do so at a profit. This markup has gotten even bigger after the recent moves by the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department to help the housing sector.

In September, the Fed announced plans to buy large amounts of mor tgage-backed bonds. The proposal has driven the price of such securities higher, allowing banks to earn an even bigger financial gain when they sell their mortgages into the market.

A Treasury program makes it easier for homeowners who are underwater, meaning their properties are worth less than their loans, to refinance. This initiative - coupled with the ultralow interest rates - has generated a flurry of refinancing activity, producing a windfall for banks.

Some analysts expect banks to keep churning out profits on mortgages. They think it unlikely that there will be a letup in refinancing anytime soon, given that rates are expected to stay low for a while. The average rate on a 30-year fixed rate mortgage has dropped to 3.36 percent, from 3.95 percent at the end of 2011, according to Freddie Mac figures.

“I estimate that close to half of mortgages have an economic incentive to refinance,” said Paul Miller, a banking analyst at FBR Capital Markets.

Mr. Miller believes the steady stream of refinancings will last for multiple quarters. Banks are reluctant to expand their mortgage operations, meaning the market can handle only a limited volume of loans at a time.

These banks fear that entities like Fannie Mae, which guarantee the loans, have become a lot more demanding when asking banks to take back troubled loans. The so-called put-backs can quickly prompt losses that can surpass the income that banks originally made on the loans. And though the quality of loans written since the crisis has been high, banks fear they could be swamped with put-backs if the economy slows.

“There's a lot of uncertainty at the moment, and it does weigh,” said Mr. Goldberg, the Barclays analyst.

If some banks remain nervous about increasing the amount of mortgages they originate, it only tightens the grip of the few dominant lenders, making it easier for them to determine the interest rates ordinary borrowers pay an d generate strong profits. Those rates could be well under 3 percent, if the gains banks make when they sell the mortgages were at historical levels, according to a New York Times analysis earlier this year.

Some of the top banks benefited from the wave of consolidation that occurred during the financial crisis. In the first half of 2012, for instance, Wells Fargo, which acquired Wachovia, and JPMorgan Chase, which consumed Washington Mutual, accounted 44 percent of all mortgages, according to figures from Inside Mortgage Finance.

In first half of 2012, Wells Fargo reported gains of $4.83 billion when originating mortgages, a 155 percent increase from $1.89 billion in the first half of 2011. JPMorgan's mortgage production revenue was up 70 percent.

Still, some analysts are less certain about the strength of the refinancing boom. If Mitt Romney wins the presidential election, he could move quickly to overhaul housing finance in ways that could, at least temp orarily, unsettle the mortgage market.

There are more immediate concerns, though.

“The biggest threat is a rise in interest rates,” said Guy Cecala, publisher of Inside Mortgage Finance. For many borrowers, refinancing would no longer make sense if mortgage rates went back up to, say, 3.75 percent.

Even if mortgage rates stay low, the big banks might finally start to see more competition. The temptation of bigger mortgage gains may come to outweigh the fears that some banks have.

“If this lasts longer than expected, you will see banks re-enter the game,” said Todd Hagerman, banking analyst at Sterne Agee & Leach.



Realogy Surges in Trading Debut

The market offered a warm welcome to two newly public companies on Thursday.

Realogy Holdings and Shutterstock rose in their first hours on the public market, defying a broader sense of uncertainty surrounding new listings.

With Realogy, a real estate company backed by Apollo Global Management, investors are betting on a recovery in the housing market. Realogy priced its offering at $27 a share on Wednesday, the top of its expected range, raising $1.08 billion to pay down debt.

By Thursday morning, Realogy's shares climbed as much as 27 percent above the I.P.O. price to trade around $34. Shares of Shutterstock, a stock photography company, rose as much as 30 percent to trade around $22. (Shutterstock raised $76.5 million from investors on Wednesday.)

Realogy's strong debut on Thursday is welcome news for Apollo, which is holding on to a 48 percent stake. It may also be seen as positive for private equity firms looking for exits. Buyout firms are pre paring to offload a glut of companies that they bought in boom times, a task that can prove difficult.

Apollo itself wasn't so fortunate with another company, the Berry Plastics Group, last week. With investors showing little enthusiasm for I.P.O.'s, Berry tumbled in its debut and is still trading below its offering price.



Business Day Live: For JPMorgan, a Case Is Built on Taped Calls

Prosecutors using tapes to build criminal case over JPMorgan loss. | Privatizing Greece's port of Piraeus. | E-mails hint at collusion between private equity giants.

The Fallout From JPMorgan\'s Loss

FALLOUT FROM JPMORGAN LOSS  |  Federal authorities are developing criminal cases related to the multibillion-dollar trading loss at JPMorgan Chase, and arrests could come in the next several months, report DealBook's Ben Protess and Azam Ahmed. As part of their effort, investigators are poring over thousands of recorded phone calls; in some, employees discussed “how to value the troubled bets in a favorable way.”

The investigation focuses on four people who worked in the bank's chief investment office in London, including Bruno Iksil, the trader known as the London whale, and Achilles Macris, an executive in that unit. DealBook writes: “Authorities are examining how some traders in the chief investment office influenced market prices as their bets began to sour. Investigators are also looking into whether records were falsified to hide the problems from executives in New York.”

Jamie Dimon, the chief executive, called the money-losing trades a “stupid error” during a talk at the Council on Foreign Relations on Wednesday. He also addressed the acquisition of Bear Stearns in 2008, estimating JPMorgan ultimately lost “$5 billion to $10 billion” on the deal. Calling the deal a “favor” to the government, Mr. Dimon said he might not do it again, “knowing what I know today.”

JPMorgan's chief financial officer, Douglas Braunstein, is expected to step down by the end of the year, in the latest management change since the trading loss, reports Jessica Silver-Greenberg for DealBook. Mr. Braunstein, whose reputation suffered after the trades went bad, is expected to remain at the bank after giving up his post, Ms. Silver-Greenberg reports.

A judge in Oklahoma this week found that JPMorgan was “grossly negligent and reckless” in handling a client's trust account , ordering the company to pay $18 million, DealBook's Susanne Craig reports. The judge said the bank breached its fiduciary duties to the trust of Carolyn S. Burford, an oil heiress who died in 1996.

PRIVATE EQUITY'S CLUBBY WAYS  |  The buyout industry may not be as fiercely competitive as it seems. Newly released e-mails in a civil lawsuit that dates back to the private equity boom times depict “a secret pact between the firms that divided up the big deals among themselves and artificially - and illegally - kept their prices low,” write Peter Lattman and Eric Lichtblau in DealBook. For instance, K.K.R. asked competitors to “step down” during the bidding for the hospital chain HCA in 2006, according to an e-mail written by Daniel Akerson, then a partner at Carlyle and now the chief executive of General Motors. At that time, the suggestion that these firms might be c olluding was enough to send the business “into a panic,” Andrew Ross Sorkin wrote in 2006.

Proving the case could be difficult. Fortune's Dan Primack notes that “it's tough to argue conspiracy against so many firms on such a large number of deals, particularly when the record is clear that many of the defendants competed against each other on some of those very transactions.”

HOW BIG IS TOO BIG?  |  Congress should consider setting a specific limit on the size of financial institutions, Daniel K. Tarullo, a Federal Reserve Board governor, said in a speech on Wednesday. Mr. Tarullo argued that there would be merit in “adopting a simpler policy instrument, rather than relying on indirect, incomplete policy measures such as administrative calculation of potentially complex financial stability footprints.”

ON T HE AGENDA  | 
Realogy is set to start trading today after pricing its I.P.O. at $27 a share, the top of the expected range. Workday, the human resources software company, is expected to price its offering this evening. Safeway reports earnings before the market opens. Maurice R. “Hank” Greenberg, the former A.I.G. chairman, is on Bloomberg TV at 8:14 a.m. Sean Egan, the president of Egan-Jones Ratings Company, is on CNBC at 10 a.m. Donald J. Trump is on CNBC at 4:10 p.m. Larry Summers is appearing on Bloomberg TV at 4:30 p.m. And Jeff Weiner, the chief executive of LinkedIn, is on Bloomberg TV at 6 p.m. Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. faces off with Representative Paul D. Ryan tonight in the vice-presidential debate.

GOLDMAN AND THE MUPPETS  | 
Greg Smith's book , “Why I Left Goldman Sachs,” doesn't come out until later this month, but his former employer is already preparing a response. Goldman “has told its board of directors that an internal investigation found little substance to allegations” made by Mr. Smith, The Financial Times reports. Mr. Smith, who took Goldman to task for its profit-driven ways, also worried about his own pay; he was said to have asked to make more than $1 million, prompting one manager to say he “needs to tone it down.”

As for his claim that Goldman employees referred derisively to clients as “muppets,” The Financial Times says Goldman found about 4,000 mentions of “muppet” in e-mails, but 99 percent were in reference to last year's movie.

JULIAN ROBERTSON'S ADVICE  | 
“I would really rather see young people go into engineering or stem cells,” said Mr. Robertson, the founder of T iger Management, at a gala for the New York Stem Cell Foundation. “There are too many people managing money now.”

Mergers & Acquisitions '

SoftBank Said to Be in Talks to Buy Sprint Stake  |  The Japanese mobile carrier SoftBank is considering buying a two-thirds stake in Sprint Nextel, a deal estimated to be worth at least $12.8 billion, according to various reports.
REUTERS  |  WALL STREET JOURNAL  |  BLOOMBERG NEWS

A.I.A. to Pay $1.7 Billion for ING's Malaysia Business  |  A.I.A. said the acquisition will catapult it to the No. 1 position in Malaysia's lucrative li fe insurance market. For the Dutch insurer ING, it is the first major deal in its plan to divest its Asian assets.
DealBook '

Bakrie Family Offers to Buy Assets from Bumi  |  The dynastic Bakrie family of Indonesia has proposed a split from the coal mining company Bumi that it helped to create with the British financier Nathaniel Rothschild.
DealBook '

Hedge Funds Expect Glencore-Xstrata Deal to Succeed  |  Hedge fund positions would indicate optimism for the merger, although there are some obstacles that the companies will have to overcome, The Wall Street Journal writes.
WALL STREET JOURNAL

Ex-Central Banker in Canada Supports Cn ooc Deal  |  David Dodge, who left his post at the Bank of Canada in 2008, dismissed arguments against Cnooc's takeover of Nexen, Reuters reports.
REUTERS

Collapse of Aerospace Merger Deals Blow to Army of Advisers  |  For the small battalion of bankers and lawyers advising EADS and BAE Systems, the end of merger talks between the two aerospace giants brings no small amount of anguish over lost fees.
DealBook '

INVESTMENT BANKING '

Cohn Says Goldman Doesn't Need More Deposits  |  The Goldman Sachs president told Bloomberg News: “The reality is that you can only use deposits for specific parts of your business. So our investm ent-banking business is on equal footing with everyone else's banking footing when it comes to financing that business.”
BLOOMBERG NEWS

London Metal Exchange May Add Trading Sessions  |  The exchange is contemplating adding early-morning trading sessions for certain futures contracts, Reuters reports.
REUTERS

JPMorgan Proprietary Trader Attracts New Investors  |  Fahad Roumani of JPMorgan Chase has achieved 14 percent returns this year, “boosting efforts to win new investors and replace money the bank has started to pull from the fund,” Reuters reports.
REUTERS

University of Cambridge Taps Debt Markets  |  Cambridge sold its first bond at a 3.75 percent interest rate, The Wall Street Journal reports.
WALL STREET JOURNAL

PRIVATE EQUITY '

Private Equity Firms Think More About Societal Issues  |  In response to pressure from limited partners, private equity firms are increasingly “writing in environmental, social and governance clauses into their portfolios,” The Wall Street Journal writes.
WALL STREET JOURNAL

Bain and Apollo Said to Circle McGraw-Hill Unit  |  A deal for the education unit of McGraw-Hill Companies could be worth around $3 billion, according to Reuters.
REUTERS

Resource Capital Said to Seek $1.75 Billion for New Fund  | 
BLOOMBERG NEWS

HEDGE FUNDS '

Man Group Buoyed by Deal Speculation  |  The hedge fund's shares rose after a British newspaper said BlackRock was considering it for a potential acquisition.
BLOOMBERG NEWS

Octavian, an Activist Fund, Is Shutting Down  | 
REUTERS

BlueMountain Fund Attracts $1.4 Billion  |  BlueMountain Capital Management, a firm that took the other side of some of JPMorgan Chase's money-losing tr ades in London, raised a fund focusing on credit opportunities, Pensions & Investments reports.
PENSIONS & INVESTMENTS

I.P.O./OFFERINGS '

R.B.S. Raises $1.3 Billion in Listing of Insurance Unit  |  The Royal Bank of Scotland, majority owned by the British government, has raised $1.3 billion through the initial public offering of its insurance unit Direct Line.
DealBook '

MegaFon Looks to Reassure Investors Before I.P.O.  |  A day after revealing that Goldman Sachs would no longer be working on the I.P.O., MegaFon of Russia said corporate governance was “very important,” Bloomberg News reports.
BLOOMBERG NEWS

Indian Hospital Chain Said to Plan to Raise $415.5 Million in I.P.O.  | 
WALL STREET JOURNAL

VENTURE CAPITAL '

A Bain Deal That Was Doomed From the Start  |  Gawker says Bain Capital Ventures, Bain's venture capital affiliate, pitched the media company on doing a deal. Unfortunately for the young venture capitalist making the offer, Gawker's history with Bain Capital is less than amicable.
GAWKER

In Africa, Female Entrepreneurs Drive Growth  |  Entrepreneurs, many of them women, “are harnessing Africa's businesses and brands as the continent enjoys its greatest economic success in g enerations,” The New York Times reports.
NEW YORK TIMES

Start-Up Offers a New Way to Drive  |  Lit Motors is developing an electric motorcycle that “looks as if it came out of the movie ‘Tron,'” The New York Times writes.
NEW YORK TIMES

LEGAL/REGULATORY '

A Primer on Wall Street Reform  |  The new book by Sheila Bair offers “a compelling vision for financial-sector reform,” writes Simon Johnson on the Economix blog. The presidential candidates, he says, should make sure to read it.
NEW YORK TIMES ECONOMIX

Regulators Focus on Banks' Loan Reserves  |  When banks report earnings, regulators will keep a close eye on how much of their profit comes from reducing their reserves against losses, The Wall Street Journal writes.
WALL STREET JOURNAL

How Much Will Clients of Peregrine Financial Get Back?  |  Russell Wasendorf, Peregrine's founder, “believes that people will receive more than what's been reported,” according to his pastor.
WALL STREET JOURNAL

Standard & Poor's Cuts Spain to Lowest Investment Grade  | 
WALL STREET JOURNAL



SoftBank of Japan Said to Near a Deal for Control of Sprint

SoftBank of Japan is nearing a deal to buy control of Sprint Nextel, giving the struggling American cellphone service provider a deep-pocketed backer to help finance its turnaround effort.

A transaction may be announced soon, a person briefed on the matter said on Thursday. But the person cautioned that the final details were still being negotiated and talks may still fall apart.

If a deal is completed, Sprint would gain substantial financial heft. SoftBank, one of Japan's biggest cellphone service providers, could provide additional resources for Spring build out its next-generation network.

Sprint has long labored in the shadow of its bigger rivals, Verizon Wireless and AT&T, and in recent years has sought to compete primarily on price. But the company risked being overshadowed by T-Mobile USA's plan to merge with MetroPCS, a deal that could create a tougher competitor in the lower end of the cellphone market.

Sprint had nearly purchased MetroPCS earlier this year, only for its board to veto the deal because it deemed the acquisition too expensive. Reports had said that Sprint was weighing making another run at MetroPCS, weighing down on the bigger service provider's shares for days.

Buying Sprint would give SoftBank an entryway into the American market, one of the largest in the world. The Japanese company has steadily surpassed rivals in its home country, in large part through acquisitions. Earlier this month, it agreed to buy a smaller competitor, eAccess, to become the second-biggest service provider in Japan.

A deal for a Sprint stake would be among the biggest in SoftBank's history, rivaling its $15.4 billion takeover of Vodafone‘s Japan operations. Shares in Sprint closed up 1.8 percent on Wednesday, giving the company a market value of about $15.1 billion.

Representatives for SoftBank and Sprint were not immediately available for comment.



SoftBank of Japan Said to Near a Deal for Control of Sprint

SoftBank of Japan is nearing a deal to buy control of Sprint Nextel, giving the struggling American cellphone service provider a deep-pocketed backer to help finance its turnaround effort.

A transaction may be announced soon, a person briefed on the matter said on Thursday. But the person cautioned that the final details were still being negotiated and talks may still fall apart.

If a deal is completed, Sprint would gain substantial financial heft. SoftBank, one of Japan's biggest cellphone service providers, could provide additional resources for Spring build out its next-generation network.

Sprint has long labored in the shadow of its bigger rivals, Verizon Wireless and AT&T, and in recent years has sought to compete primarily on price. But the company risked being overshadowed by T-Mobile USA's plan to merge with MetroPCS, a deal that could create a tougher competitor in the lower end of the cellphone market.

Sprint had nearly purchased MetroPCS earlier this year, only for its board to veto the deal because it deemed the acquisition too expensive. Reports had said that Sprint was weighing making another run at MetroPCS, weighing down on the bigger service provider's shares for days.

Buying Sprint would give SoftBank an entryway into the American market, one of the largest in the world. The Japanese company has steadily surpassed rivals in its home country, in large part through acquisitions. Earlier this month, it agreed to buy a smaller competitor, eAccess, to become the second-biggest service provider in Japan.

A deal for a Sprint stake would be among the biggest in SoftBank's history, rivaling its $15.4 billion takeover of Vodafone‘s Japan operations. Shares in Sprint closed up 1.8 percent on Wednesday, giving the company a market value of about $15.1 billion.

Representatives for SoftBank and Sprint were not immediately available for comment.



R.B.S. Raises $1.3 Billion in Listing of Insurance Unit

LONDON â€" The Royal Bank of Scotland stands to collect £787 million ($1.3 billion) through the initial public offering of its insurance unit Direct Line, which started trading on Thursday.

The share sale is part of a mandate from the European Union, which required British bank to offload the business as a condition of receiving a government bailout during the financial crisis.

Royal Bank of Scotland, which is still 81 percent owned by the British government, must sell its remaining stake in the business by 2014.

The Edinburgh-based bank said it had sold a 30 percent stake in Direct Line at 175 pence per share. Stock in the British insurance business, which started trading on a conditional basis, had risen 5.9 percent on Thursday.

The I.P.O is one of the largest so far this year in Europe and values the company at £2.6 billion. To access a larger pool of investors, retail shareholders were offered a roughly 15 percent allocation of Direc t Line's shares that were sold on Thursday.

The ongoing European debt crisis has made it difficult for companies to raise money through I.P.O.'s. Earlier this year, the Dutch cable operator Ziggo and the Swiss logistics company DKSH raised a combined $2 billion.

Since then, several companies, including the German chemicals company Evonik, have postponed their European listings because of the uncertainty economic climate.

Last month, Direct Line announced plans to cut almost 900 jobs from its 15,000 workforce as it looked to reduce costs. The insurer said the layoffs were part of a £100 million annual cost-cutting plan for the next two years.

Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs and UBS are working on the I.P.O.



Bakrie Family Offer to Buy Assets from Bumi

LONDON - The Indonesian Bakrie family on Thursday proposed a split from the coal mining company Bumi that they helped to create with the British financier Nathaniel Rothschild.

The announcement is the latest in a flurry of boardroom maneuvers between the dynastic Bakries and Mr. Rothschild, whose own family can date its heritage in the European banking industry back to the 18th century, over the control of the London-listed company whose share price has plunged 66 percent over the last 12 months.

In a statement on Thursday, Bumi said it had received an offer from the Bakries to acquire the company's 29.2 percent stake in the Indonesian coal miner PT Bumi Resources.

Under the terms of the proposed deal, companies controlled by the Bakrie family would swap their 23.8 percent stake in Bumi for a 10.3 percent holding in PT Bumi Resources. The Indonesian family would then offer to buy the remaining 18.9 percent stake in the Indonesian coal mining company for c ash by the end of the year.

The Bakries also proposed to buy Bumi's majority control of PT Berau Coal Energy, another Indonesian mining company, within the next six months.

By offering to buy the stakes in the two Indonesian companies, the Bakries would take control of the majority of Bumi's mining assets. The deal would leave Bumi with only a few remaining mining operations around the world.

No financial terms of the deals were released, and Bumi's board said they would consider the share exchange proposal.

In early morning trading in London, shares in the London-listed company had risen 28.5 percent.

The announcement comes as Bumi's board meets in Singapore on Thursday to discuss allegations of financial misconduct at some of the firm's subsidiaries amid concerns over the company's tumbling share price.

Last month, the London-listed company said it was investigating irregularities at PT Bumi Resources.

The allegations relate to fin ancial accounting records for last year in which certain investments were marked down to zero, according to a statement from Bumi.

Tensions between Mr. Rothschild and the Indonesian family have been high since the British financier called for a shakeup last year in the management of PT Bumi Resources.

In response, Indra Bakrie, then the chairman of Bumi, and Samin Tan, an Indonesia mining mogul, moved to oust Mr. Rothschild from the running of the company that he had helped to create.

Earlier this year, Mr. Rothshcild's Indonesian partners called for a shareholder meeting to reshuffle Bumi's executives. Mr. Tan took over as chairman, while Mr. Rothschild became a non-independent director.

Representatives for Mr. Rothschild and the Bakrie family were not immediately available for comment.