Total Pageviews

Perelman Company Reaches Another Settlement

For the second time in as many weeks, the billionaire financier Ronald O. Perelman has found himself in the government’s crosshairs.

On Tuesday, MacAndrews & Forbes, Mr. Perelman’s holding company, said it had agreed to pay a $720,000 civil penalty to resolve accusations that the company violated reporting requirements related to its acquisition of stock in the Scientific Games Corporation.

The antitrust division of the Justice Department â€" at the recommendation of the Federal Trade Commission â€" filed a civil action on Thursday in Federal District Court in Washington against MacAndrews & Forbes alongside the proposed settlement, which must be approved by a judge.

A week ago, Revlon, the cosmetics business controlled by Mr. Perelman, agreed to pay $850,000 to the Securities and Exchange Commission to settle accusations that it had deceived shareholders and its independent directors in connection with a failed 2009 attempt to take the company private.

In the case filed on Thusday, the Justice Department accused MacAndrews & Forbes of violating the antitrust laws related to notification requirements before acquiring large stock positions.

Mr. Perelman, who has an estimated net worth of about $12 billion, has been building a position in Scientific Games, a New York-based provider of lottery and gaming services, since 2003. Today, he owns about 38 percent of the company, which has a $930 million market value.

In June 2012, MacAndrews & Forbes acquired additional voting shares in the company and crossed the threshold that would have acquired it to report its holdings under a federal law called the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act. The law provides the F.T.C. and the Justice Department â€" the two arms of government that oversee antitrust laws â€" with information about large mergers and acquisitions before they take place.

Christine Taylor, a spokeswoman for MacAndrews & Forbes, said that the failure to report was a technical and inadvertent mistake that was self-repo! rted, a fact acknowledged by the F.T.C. MacAndrews & Forbes was represented in the case by Robert B. Barnett of Williams & Connolly.

“It was promptly corrected and did not involve any financial benefit,” Ms. Taylor said. MacAndrews & Forbes, she added, “has implemented additional safeguards to ensure that a mistake of this kind does not occur in the future.”